Search results

Human rights and your job Sunday, 16 November 2008 Singapore Democrats Will your job be there next year, next month, or even the next day? Judging by the reports of job cuts occurring across all sectors, this question must loom large in the minds of workers here. The ailing...

It's not Walter but fascist dictator Lee who is behind all this. Walter is only an errand boy. To reproduce what was said to have happened by the AGC of a two-day old "court case", is clear confirmation that ST is the running dog of the corrupt regime.

How to be a "politician" in a dictatorship headed by an octogenarian who doesn't believe in politics but relies on corruption, nepotism and cronyism?

What was worse is the fact that JBJ was put through "a series of mistrials" in Lee Kuan Yew's kangaroo courts for "offences" he did not commit.

Why did this "report" originate from the AGC, appearing in PAP propaganda mouthpiece ST two days after the "trial"?

The usual PAP hyperbole targeted at overseas audience not conversant with what is going on under a fascist dictatorship.

He's a PAP running dog, alright. What good government when it's headed by an incompetent baboon just because he/it is the offspring of an octogenarian dictator who refuses to give up? Where is the transparency and accountability? Where is our hard-earned CPF savings? Why is daughter-in-law...

This is the hallmark of a fascist regime that doesn't depend on the people, the voters, to continue in power. But the dictator keeps trumpeting that it was through popular support his party remains in government. The electoral process, the parliament, the police, the judiciary, etc, etc...

Chee and the other defendants are Singaporeans firmly rooted here. They maintain from the start that it was through discrimination and abuse of the police and the judiciary, that they are facing this trial. Chee did tell the judge that he wanted to hear from the witness why it took him...

You're spot on!

What we are talking about is how did Chee's date of birth gotten on to the application form, the original of which that Chee submitted through the Internet did not contain a column for his DOB? The big deal is that, it was not SI Yeo, a junior officer who had purportedly rejected the...

Of course, Chee's name in the application form, address, etc are not confidential. The point here is why did the police take almost a month to respond, despite having stated clearly in the application form that it would not take more than seven days?

SI Yeo's contention was that the whole process is confidential and the judge allowed it.

The big question is there were others like Yap who were not part of the TBT protesters. But the police decided to include him only, why?

Chee made the application through the Internet and the application form did not have a column to capture his DOB. But what was intriguing is the fact that when the standard form was rejected and received by Chee it had a mysterious column that included his DOB. Here, the obvious question is...

Not only the police's credibility, if there's any left, is at stake but also that of the judge who had disallowed CSJ's question on the long delay in processing his application.

The SDP is clear on this and other issues. But what is not clear is why this chap Yap Keng Ho is lumped together with the other defendants.

Maybe, the "confidentiality" claimed by SI Yeo is necessary in the interest of "security and public order" due to Mas Selamat's escape.

By endorsing this so-called 66.6% mandate, repeatedly claimed by the fascist dictatorial PAP, are you not giving credence to the skewed electoral process that is clearly managed and executed by the PAP itself?

In a Kangaroo court "confidentiality" reigns supreme. The fascist dictatorship has unleashed its compliant judiciary to settle its political score with the opposition.