Search results

I'm still waiting for my sifu to address the elephant in the room about women-free. :biggrin:

@WangChuk You 幹的好事 ？:o-o:

The first step is to live a women-free life. :rolleyes:

Why charge only $2? Why not $20? Or $200? The restaurant has two-third majority in Parliament? Can pass laws liao ah?

Iran not scared of SAF ?

@Sustanon Can.

@Sustanon new home

This is because they view the issue from a single perspective of affordability, which can create an illusion of prestige.

You should stay in KL and prowl Tun Sambanthan area for CECA buus.

Bloomberg appears to have some insight into the buyer’s identity. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/tan-see-leng-bloomberg-defamation-reporter-suggested-quote-6048861

Where is Bukit Timah hawker centre ?

CECA badge more prestigious than Blue CHAS.

The author seems to have things a bit mixed up. Shan is the claimant—he does not need to defend anything; that responsibility lies with Bloomberg. In court, arguments are based on the applicable legal provisions, not politics. If Shan succeeds, he receives compensation. In the political arena...

That leaves you with only Captain Goh.

This is the thrust of the claim:

And the buyer must pay 65% in stamp duty - upfront - for using a trust to purchase. After completion, the buyer can apply for IRAS for partial or full refund, subject to IRAS approval. So at the very least, IRAS will know who the buyer is, as in the beneficial owner of the trust.

If the buyer is a Singaporean, no need.

It's called 'introducing new evidence via the backdoor'.