Search results

uncle can read chinese so i dun have to download something which i can read myself... you cannto so must download dun need to act blur act seow, whats the problem whats the problem wohhhh... u stupid i stupid he stupid they stupid...:D uncle just ask you simple question: 關關雎鳩 在河之洲 窈窕淑女...

haizzz...how many times you wantto act blur act seow... the quetino is ehre...eveyrbody can see, you can pretend pretend...even better everybody see 關關雎鳩 在河之洲 窈窕淑女 君子好逑 參差荇菜 左右流之 窈窕淑女 寤寐求之 求之不得 寤寐思服 悠哉悠哉 輾轉反側 參差荇菜 左右采之 窈窕淑女 琴瑟友之 參差荇菜 左右芼之 窈窕淑女 鐘鼓樂之 鳩 rhymes with 洲, 女and 逑? 菜...

reading a 3000 year old chinese poem in mandarin with no rhymes and with an alien syntax but still can claims that it sounds fine .... (despite of historical evidence that the poem challenged and baffled scholars for generations) is called dishonest and disingenuous and purely shameless...

small boy , uncle is not asking asked you whether it sound fine to you, shit will oso taste fine to a roach... uncle is telling you it does not rhyme in mandarin , poem dun rhyme then call poem for wat. the essence of the poem is lost. just like the tao te ching is lost in mandarin...

well said, dishonest and disgrace are the best words to describe si kar ghua, let me oso add....disingenuous and disturbing

reading tao de ching in mandarin menas you do not understand what lao zhi was talking about because he was speaking in old chinese... simple as that.. .same point that scroobal was putting to you but you have simply dodge this ..... this is magnified if you are talking abt shijing. on the...

lol no more power left to make infractions issit...unlce has another 10 000 accts waiting for you hor...

you are already being ignored....lol ....

LOL...i think you are losing it.....ok let uncle point out your mistake whether we are reciting and reading it in english and malay, it makes no difference... in both scenarios, the foreign reader just like the mandarin reader cannot appreciate the nuances that the author would have intended...

you are losing it ....calm down adn try to focus.... i can give you an english and malays translation of tao de jing or give it to an ang mo or malay....they can read this in their own languages like you read this in mandarin.....you can have a rough idea of what it says but you will never...

you are arguing in circles as usual, you might as well recite tao te ching in english and malay, do you think it is the same as reciting it in its original language? and pls do not further your partyline by suggesting that our ncestor's lagnuages is muddled and unclear .... it is an insult to...

i cant believe this ...uncle has been in this forum since 2003....now want to ban me for using my old nick....well-done..... back to you confused little one-why is uncle in a position to tell you all these, because i am far more superior to you in terms of history. languages and most of all...