• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Search results

  1. THE_CHANSTER

    Chitchat FIFA World Cup: Qatar 2022 [Official Thread@]

    Blimey 7-0!:biggrin::biggrin::biggrin: This is frankly an exhibition match. Don't think Costa Rica have even been in the Spanish half.
  2. THE_CHANSTER

    Chitchat FIFA World Cup: Qatar 2022 [Official Thread@]

    5-0. The agony will be almost over for Costa Rica...
  3. THE_CHANSTER

    Chitchat FIFA World Cup: Qatar 2022 [Official Thread@]

    This match is so one-sided. Potential for a big Spanish win.
  4. THE_CHANSTER

    Chitchat FIFA World Cup: Qatar 2022 [Official Thread@]

    You're as wrong about the Germans as I was about the Saudis... Predictions for Spain vs Costa Rica?
  5. THE_CHANSTER

    Chitchat FIFA World Cup: Qatar 2022 [Official Thread@]

    Germany's form recently has not been that great. Potential for an upset on the cards.
  6. THE_CHANSTER

    Malaysia's $100 billion luxury estate is a ghost town full of empty skyscrapers and deserted roads

    If you’re ever in London go take a look at the Battersea Power Station redevelopment project . All funded mostly by PNB, S P Setia and Sime Darby. Even Agong showed up for the opening ceremony last month. https://batterseapowerstation.co.uk/...
  7. THE_CHANSTER

    Chitchat FIFA World Cup: Qatar 2022 [Official Thread@]

    Fair play to the Saudis on this result. Well played.
  8. THE_CHANSTER

    Chitchat FIFA World Cup: Qatar 2022 [Official Thread@]

    Last chance for Messi in a WC. Like Qatar, Saudis only here to make up the numbers.
  9. THE_CHANSTER

    Chitchat FIFA World Cup: Qatar 2022 [Official Thread@]

    The Yanks should have won that game.
  10. THE_CHANSTER

    Pork Nasi Lemak

    Anyone tried Pork satay?
  11. THE_CHANSTER

    We need to bring sexy aerobics back !

    I don't wish to see Singapore aunties line dancing on this thread. This one much more powderful...
  12. THE_CHANSTER

    [Video] - Bayi Joseph Prince preaches in Chinese

    Surely that segment of the market has been cornered by Lawrence Khong.
  13. THE_CHANSTER

    Indonesia peacemaker for senile Biden and dictator Xi?

    The optics of this interaction don't look good. <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"> FM Sergey Lavrov &amp; PM of Singapore <a href="https://twitter.com/leehsienloong?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@leehsienloong</a> meet, shake hands, have a few hugs and an improvised photo...
  14. THE_CHANSTER

    Geylang reopenin

    Commercial sex is ‘Fuck and Forget’. You’re not there for an emotional bonding experience.
  15. THE_CHANSTER

    Serious Clitoris has 10,000 plus nerves!

    All you horny sammyboy perverts need to educate yourselves (or go to the sex forum).
  16. THE_CHANSTER

    Minister K Shanmugam tell Virgin boss Richard Branson to come for live debate over strict SG drug laws or just diam diam

    Branson has 12.6m followers on Twitter and 4.8m on Instagram. The optics from Branson's blog post don't look good and I totally understand the charm offensive currently being undertaken by the likes of SPH, CNA, MHA etc...
  17. THE_CHANSTER

    The current sammyboy forum is a poor version of its former self.

    Anyone here still remembers the Delphi forum? The Original Sammyboy.
  18. THE_CHANSTER

    This Aunty very rich

    "Ri-charde Mill"
  19. THE_CHANSTER

    Mass die-off happening now: Close to 26,000 excess deaths recorded in England and Wales since April

    If you're going to post BS conspiracy nonsense, at least quote the background to your sources. :rolleyes: Type of website: "Fake News website" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_News
Back
Top