• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Search results

  1. C

    Nuclear energy for Singapore, screw solar energy.

    I would advocate nuclear waste processing as far as possible without resorting to dumping. In any case, we dump thousands of times more toxic non-radioactive chemical wastes into the earth. http://cerncourier.com/cws/article/cern/28930 has an interesting article on waste transmutation. Also...
  2. C

    Nuclear energy for Singapore, screw solar energy.

    1. When did that ever stop US nuclear submarines / carriers to park at changi naval base? http://www.singaporebikes.com/forums/showthread.php?t=250570 2. The only part I could dig up about nuclear in UNCLOS was http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/part2.htm. It just...
  3. C

    Nuclear energy for Singapore, screw solar energy.

    Need to point out some errors in your post. 1. True, High Level Wastes do require cooling, but they don't require refrigeration. A simple cooling pond will do. 2. Low level nuclear waste can be disposed of normally. High level nuclear wastes can be either stored on floating barges, reprocessed...
  4. C

    Nuclear energy for Singapore, screw solar energy.

    Synthetic fuel is not science fiction. See the Fischer-Tropsch (wikipedia-link) process. Even heavy fuels like diesel / jet fuel can be produced from this process. Synthetic fuels are cleaner than refined crude oil because they don't contain sulfur or other impurities. There's no need to change...
  5. C

    Nuclear energy for Singapore, screw solar energy.

    It seems that you did not understand what I wrote. Ok I will simplify it further so that you can understand. After all I must at least make an attempt to "reach out" to more people. Ships can operate that far out to sea. The major problem used to be bad weather, but with weather satellite...
  6. C

    Nuclear energy for Singapore, screw solar energy.

    My opinion is that dirty stuff should be done as far away from our shores as possible. That being said, I'm also not happy with the industrial pollution in "certain parts" of singapore. Land above ground should be used for greenery. Land below ground should be used for commercial traffic and...
  7. C

    Nuclear energy for Singapore, screw solar energy.

    The malaysians have been running research reactors way before us. Not to mention that indonesia also had nuclear ambitions? I have omitted alot of details in my last post to prevent the article from being too long. Why is my suggestion not practical? I don't get it.
  8. C

    Nuclear energy for Singapore, screw solar energy.

    Obviously we can't build a nuclear power station in Singapore, but I have an alternative. I propose we build it on giant container ships that also houses electrolysis as well as synthethic fuel plants. This will take oxygen/hydrogen from the water and nitrogen/carbon dioxide from the air to...
Back
Top