Search results

You don't have to prove my point again and again. Once or at most twice is enough. Forummers here all already know that you are devoid of any substance and is only capable of hurling insults and abuses. You don't have keep telling us what you are.

You proved my point once again. Thank you.

What's with the "I rest my case"? You have yet to make a case so rest what? You don't make a case just be insulting people, calling people names and hurling abuses. Show me some substance for once instead repeating and repeating your rants.

How did you prove it is a waste of time and fruitless discussing about religion when all you do is to insult and humiliate the other party with a different viewpoint. You don't give the other party to chance to air his views because right away you delve into names calling and character...

Read my reply to Devil Within.

How is my point irrelevant? You're so slow of understanding. But it's no surprise since all you can do is to hurl insults and abuse on people who takes a different position from you rather than base on arguments with merit. I said you proved my point because in response to my post that when...

If 70% of the people can be so easily conned by the PAP despite being screwed over and over again for the past 50 years, it's hardly surprising that the "sheep" at CHC are continuously conned by their Pastors despite the obvious.

You also just prove my point.

Thank you. You just proved my point.

Yes. The opening post may well be innocuous, but see how soon the following posts degenerate into hurling abuse after abuse on those who with a particular faith and those with any faith in fact. I totally agree that people must have critical minds to ask and search but it need not be done in a...

I am not here to defend any religion or faith. My point was simply that we should refrain from making insensitive remarks and extreme views against people with a faith. As I said earlier, by all means discuss religion which include pointing out the flaws and inconsistencies or even hypocrisies...

You see where I am coming from now. It is rather difficult to hold a calm and meaningful discussion on religion in social media. It always end up in obscenities and callous remarks. In your case, you are not even of any faith and yet just because you do not take any such extreme position...

Discussing religion is not futile. It is only futile when discussing with you. Your so-called discussion is all strewn with words like "stupid" and "idiot" and hurling insults at the other party. You keep accusing the other party of closing their minds but from all that you have written so far...

You beat to it. How well said.

"Other than that, I don't feel the need to go to extremes of badmouthing and cursing members of any religion, because I believe everyone has the right to believe in whatever propaganda he chooses, no matter how nonsensical or ludicrous." If people on social media can adopt such a stance when...

Read my reply to Devil Within.

When and where did I say you worship the devil? I am saying that the fact you used the word "devil" means you acknowledge that there is such a concept. And you reinforced that by adding the word "within" to your nick. In my earlier posts, I said whenever the topic of religion is being...

The more you try to defend an indefensible position, the more moronic you become. So as not to embarrass you further and leave you with a little dignity, I will not go further.

The devil within has a totally different connotation from the devil's advocate. While the latter has no sinister implications and in fact of noble intentions, the devil within is all about being on the dark side, being from the underworld etc. You chose a nick without even knowing what it...

Then pray tell why your nick is not devil's advocate instead of devil within. Just admit that you been caught out!