Israel struck Lebanon in retaliation because Hezbollah struck Israel because they wanted to support Iran, so whose fault for breaking the ceasefire?

Even after the ceasefire, israelhave been bombing lebanon. Continuously while hezbollah held back.

True Believer said:

This reminds me of 7 Oct 2023 when Hamas invaded Israel, murdered and kidnapped Israeli citizens, then "cried father and mother" after the IDF retaliated.

Click to expand...

I believe hamas did not cry mother cry father. People who live under brutal occupation have the right to violent uprising.
The bulk of the killing of israeli was done by idf apache helicopters who used hellfire missiles and burned those fleeing the concert to a crisp.
Those who were held hostage in their own homes were by hamas was blasted by tank fire. Israel do not believe in saving hostages in the " Hannibal directive".

PAKISTAN ANNOUNCED A CEASEFIRE.

The problem is...nobody agreed to the ceasefire Pakistan announced.

This is one of the most extraordinary diplomatic moments in recent memory.

WHAT PAKISTAN SAID.

Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif posted on X:

"With the greatest humility, I am pleased to announce that the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America, along with their allies, have agreed to an immediate ceasefire everywhere including Lebanon and elsewhere — EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY."

Everywhere. Including Lebanon. Effective immediately

WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED.

Within hours, Israel launched "Operation Eternal Darkness" — hitting more than 100 targets across Lebanon in 10 minutes.

At least 254 people killed.

Trump was asked directly why Lebanon was not included. He said: "Because of Hezbollah. They were not included in the deal."

Netanyahu's office issued a statement saying the ceasefire "does not include Lebanon."

The White House stated: "Lebanon is not part of the ceasefire. That has been relayed to all parties involved."

JD Vance said: "I think this comes from a legitimate misunderstanding."

*THEN IT GOT WORSE.

Reports emerged that Pakistan had passed different versions of Iran's 10-point proposal to Washington and to Tehran.

Not the same document. Different versions. To different parties.

Vance confirmed there were actually three different versions of the proposal floating around simultaneously.

Three versions. One ceasefire. Nobody agrees on what was signed.

I WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR BEFORE I SAY THE NEXT PART.

I have deep respect for Pakistan and its people.

What I'm about to say is not a criticism of Pakistan as a nation, it is simply an honest account of what happened diplomatically.

Pakistan stepped into an incredibly difficult situation, and its leadership genuinely wanted peace. That matters.

But here is what I have been saying for days.

Pakistan was a messenger in this negotiation.

It carried proposals between Washington and Tehran.

It did not write those proposals. It did not negotiate them.

And when the two sides discovered they had been given different versions of the same document the contradiction became impossible to ignore.

The announcement of a ceasefire that included Lebanon when Lebanon was never part of the deal turned what could have been a proud diplomatic moment into an embarrassing one.

Not because of bad intentions.

But because the role of messenger and the role of deal-maker are two completely different things. And they got conflated.

I was saying this before it became obvious. Today, it became obvious.

THE IRONY NOBODY IS SAYING OUT LOUD.

Pakistan spent 40 days of this war trying to stay neutral, refusing to anger Iran, the UAE, or the U.S. simultaneously.

It ended up angering all three with a single announcement.

A country navigating enormous financial pressures, repaying billions in debt, managing IMF obligations somehow found itself at the center of the most complex negotiation of the decade overnight.

The world gave it a standing ovation.

And then read the fine print.

The Islamabad talks begin this week. Pakistan will host them.

And every party arriving will remember that what Pakistan announced, and what any of them actually agreed to were two very different things.

Watch Islamabad carefully.

Robert kiyosaki

Let says the SAME(rule out if they are different first) document handed to US
Can it be confirmed that the SAME document is handed to Trump or passed a beautified copy to make him happy?
And when Levitt said the 1st version was thrown; a 2nd version was immediately available to him which he commented as "workable"
So are there few more copies under the table?
'
'

But the cease-fire does not cover Lebanon...only Iran.. but hopefully this garbage cease fire which Trump should never agree too...n Trump will finally put an end to the terrorists regime