- Joined
- Dec 6, 2018
- Messages
- 18,164
- Points
- 113
Another new shitizen to replace local born Sinkie by PAP.
- Thread starter A Singaporean
- Start date
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2023
- Messages
- 4,457
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2024
- Messages
- 6,075
- Points
- 113
True blue Singaporeans are no longer united as they have been divided and conquered too many times. It’s better for them to kill one another and let the new citizens to reset them
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2023
- Messages
- 4,457
- Points
- 113
No, 65% of them are retards that's why they keep voting PAP since 1965 including low quality new shitizens who think PAP is God
True blue sinkies are doomed!
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 85,858
- Points
- 113
During his tenure at its helm, DBS was named the best bank and best digital bank in the world multiple times.
only ceca can do this due to software prowess.
only ceca can do this due to software prowess.
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2024
- Messages
- 661
- Points
- 43
DBS Bank CEO Piyush Gupta's alma mater is populated with cheaters
https://www.domainofexperts.com/2020/10/dbs-bank-ceo-piyush-guptas-alma-mater.html
https://www.domainofexperts.com/2020/10/dbs-bank-ceo-piyush-guptas-alma-mater.html
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2023
- Messages
- 4,457
- Points
- 113
CECA talent is throwing smoke bomb
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2008
- Messages
- 61,933
- Points
- 113
best in data theft, downtime, inaccessibility, and kena scammed and hacked as a “digital” bank.
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2023
- Messages
- 4,457
- Points
- 113
Singapore President is beholden to the PAP as long as they graduated from PAP school, those "advisor" positions are just superfluous positions created for their friends who would be jobless without government jobsOh, and all predecessors at the Istana didn't need the advising? Only the current WEF doggie from Taman Jurong does?
- Joined
- May 16, 2023
- Messages
- 41,548
- Points
- 113
AI adoption linked to 13% decline in jobs for young U.S. workers, Stanford study reveals
PUBLISHED THU, AUG 28 20257:16 AM EDTShreya Ghosal
Dylan Butts@IN/DYLAN-B-7A451A107
WATCH LIVE
KEY POINTS
- The study revealed that workers between the ages of 22 and 25 have experienced a 13% relative decline in employment since 2022, in occupations most exposed to AI.
- Some examples of these highly exposed jobs include customer service representatives, accountants and software developers.
- According to the study, the findings help explain why national employment growth for young workers has been stagnant, while overall employment remains robust.
A Standford study has found evidence that the widespread adoption of generative AI is impacting the job prospects of early career workers.
Vertigo3d | E+ | Getty Images
There is growing evidence that the widespread adoption of generative AI is impacting the job prospects of America’s workers, according to a paper released on Tuesday by three Stanford University researchers.
The study analyzed payroll records from millions of American workers, generated by ADP, the largest payroll software firm in the U.S.
The report found “early, large-scale evidence consistent with the hypothesis that the AI revolution is beginning to have a significant and disproportionate impact on entry-level workers in the American labor market.”
Most notably, the findings revealed that workers between the ages of 22 and 25 in jobs most exposed to AI — such as customer service, accounting and software development — have seen a 13% decline in employment since 2022.
By contrast, employment for more experienced workers in the same fields, and for workers of all ages in less-exposed occupations such as nursing aides, has stayed steady or grown. Jobs for young health aides, for example, rose faster than their older counterparts.
Front-line production and operations supervisors’ roles also showed an increase in employment for young workers, though this growth was smaller than that for workers over the age of 35.
The potential impact of AI on the job market has been a concern across industries and age groups, but the Stanford study appears to show that the results will be far from uniform.
The study sought to rule out factors that could skew the data, including education level, remote work, outsourced jobs, and broader economic shifts, which could impact hiring decisions.
According to the Stanford study, their findings may explain why national employment growth for young workers has been stagnant, while overall employment has largely remained resilient since the global pandemic, despite recent signs of softening.
Young workers were said to be especially vulnerable because AI can replace “codified knowledge,” or “book-learning” that comes from formal education. On the other hand, AI may be less capable of replacing knowledge that comes from years of experience.
The researchers also noted that not all uses of AI are associated with declines in employment. In occupations where AI complements work and is used to help with efficiency, there have been muted changes in employment rates.
The study — which hasn’t been peer-reviewed — appears to show mounting evidence that AI will replace jobs, a topic that has been hotly debated.
Similar threads
