• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious IHiS To Fire Employees And Fine CEO For Fucking Up SingHealth's Cyber Security! Oppies Happy Now? Full Accountability!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
hzsinghealth0114.jpg


SINGAPORE - The technology agency that was pulled up for its lapses in last June's cyber attack on SingHealth has responded by firing two of its employees and slapping "significant financial penalty" on five members of its senior management team, including its chief executive.

In a statement issued on Monday (Jan 14), the Integrated Health Information Systems (IHiS), which is the central IT agency responsible for Singapore's healthcare sector, said: "IHiS takes a serious view of the incident and the need for accountability."

The cyber attack resulted in the personal information of 1.5 million patients, including Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, being stolen by hackers, and the lapses by IHiS were highlighted by a high-level panel that probed the incident.

IHiS said on Monday that two individuals found to be negligent in protecting SingHealth from Singapore's worst data breach will have their services terminated, while a cluster information security officer will be demoted and redeployed to another role.

The agency also said its board has imposed a financial penalty on its chief executive officer, Mr Bruce Liang.

The disciplinary action follows the release of a 453-page public report last week by the Committee of Inquiry (COI) probing the incident.

The report offered recommendations to shore up defences at organisations responsible for critical information infrastructure systems. It also provided a blow-by-blow account of the events that led to the cyber attack.

IHiS did not name the remaining four members in the senior management team that it was penalising, but said they will be disciplined for their "collective leadership responsibility".

A moderate financial penalty of an unknown amount will also be imposed on two middle management supervisors, who were supervisors of the two terminated employees. IHiS did not specify any of the financial penalties it imposed.

"The CEO and management team have acknowledged their responsibilities and accepted the penalties. They have committed to leading IHiS to improve our cyber-security defence and preparedness, and rebuild public trust in our healthcare system," IHiS said.

The cluster information security officer at IHiS who will be demoted and redeployed is Mr Wee Jia Huo.

He was found to have misunderstood what constituted a security incident and failed to comply with IHiS' incident reporting processes, said the statement.

The IHiS board considered mitigating factors such as his lack of aptitude which made him unsuitable for the role.

One of the two terminated employees was a senior manager (Infra Services-Security Management) at IHiS.

He held a mistaken understanding of what constituted a security incident, and when a security incident should be reported, according to the statement.

"His passiveness even after repeated alerts by his staff resulted in missed opportunities which could have mitigated or averted the effect of the cyber attack," said IHiS.

The other person who was fired was a team lead in the Citrix team, whose set-up of the servers introduced unnecessary and significant risks to the system, it added.

Three employees - including system engineer Benjamin Lee and database administrator Katherine Tan - were commended for being proactive and demonstrating resourcefulness in managing the cyber attack.

Mr Paul Chan, chairman of IHiS board said: "The cyber attack has been a reminder of our need to be ever more vigilant and prepared for new cyber threats. Patient care will continue to be our priority. IHiS will learn from this incident, and work with the Ministry of Health and the healthcare clusters to implement the necessary changes that will help us emerge stronger from this."

https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...enalty-on-ceo-over-lapses-in-singhealth-cyber
 

red amoeba

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
How come ihis is not disbanded ? That’s y we need to populate senior positions w post SAF personnel. Only SAF officers know what it means by law by law.
 

sweetiepie

Alfrescian
Loyal
The other person who was fired was a team lead in the Citrix team, whose set-up of the servers introduced unnecessary and significant risks to the system, it added.
KNN the person who signed off the servers during commissioning should also be fired means he don't know what he had signed KNN
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
See? Told you all lor! Under the stewardship of the PAP, justice is served. CEO also got fined! Haha! Funny hor, Hen's wife is called Bruce. I suppose its a PAP thing! :laugh:
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Play taiji to the vendor, sacrificed few lambs.:biggrin:

If she signs off on the vendor selection process then her head should roll too.

However it is well known that the CEOs of government bodies have no say in the process. The vendors are simply part of the natural aristocrat group and are used by default.

What we need is for independent investigative reporters like Chua Mui Hoong to interview the CEOs and ask the hard questions.

byline-chan-mui-hoong.png
 

no_faith

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
If she signs off on the vendor selection process then her head should roll too.

However it is well known that the CEOs of government bodies have no say in the process. The vendors are simply part of the natural aristocrat group and are used by default.

What we need is for independent investigative reporters like Chua Mui Hoong to interview the CEOs and ask the hard questions.
In another words, CEO in govt bodies is tua pek gong. Sit tight tight earn tight tight.:biggrin:
 

knowwhatyouwantinlife

Alfrescian
Loyal
The problem with our working culture is inherited...let's say if the security breach was avoided would anyone say that they hve done a good job? Would they all hve extra bonuses and raises?
 
Top