• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

SAF M-60 tank better watch out to become like this

merlion_CB

Alfrescian
Loyal
爆炸就是艺术!土耳其M60T坦克炮膛炸成一朵花
支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看 2017.11.22 21:26:24
  • -vCP-fypatmw5577768.jpg

1 / 15
土耳其的M-60T在射击时发生事故,炮膛炸开。土耳其的M-60T是以色列军事工业公司从M60A3主战坦克升级后的版本,此前也曾被伊拉克武装分子使用9M113反坦克导弹击中。土耳其陆军的第三代坦克数量较少,只有350辆豹2坦克,以及这次炸膛的M-60T主战坦克。除此之外,土耳其也在努力研制国产“阿尔泰”坦克。(来源:彩云香江
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
the upgraded sinkie version of the m728 has a mine plow-equipped bulldozer. the avlb based on m60a1 chassis is right behind it.

M728_Combat_Engineer_Vehicle_%28CEV%29.jpg
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
My unit's support unit has. Combat Engineers. Bull dozer.

what's your point? Its not an M60. At one point or another, I have been in or driven every armour vehicle in the SAF, including the Tempest. The only exception being the Leo 2 and the Trailblazer. And I ain't ever seen a M-60.
 

merlion_CB

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/press_room/official_releases/nr/1997/jun/28jun97_nr.print.img.html

he 155mm Gun Howitzer Chamber Explosion on 9 Mar 97 in New Zealand



A 155mm artillery round exploded in the barrel of a FH2000 gun howitzer on Sun, 9 Mar 97 in Waiouru, New Zealand, during a live firing exercise conducted by the 23rd Battalion, Singapore Artillery. The incident resulted in the death of two full-time national servicemen, Third Sergeant Ronnie Tan Han Chong and Lance Corporal Low Yin Tit. Another 12 servicemen, including a Staff Sergeant from the New Zealand Defence Force, were injured in the incident.

The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) convened a Committee of Inquiry on 17 Mar to investigate the circumstances leading to the incident. The Committee was chaired by Mr Tan Gee Paw, Permanent Secretary (Environment). The other five members of the Committee included Mr Andrew Renton-Green, a senior official from the New Zealand Ministry of Defence, and representatives from the Ministry of Health, Legal Services of MINDEF, and the Singapore Armed Forces(SAF).

On 2 May, the Committee submitted its findings and recommendations to MINDEF. The Committee concluded that the correct procedures had been strictly followed by the artillery unit involved, and there was no human error by any member of the unit. There was also no breach of any SAF training safety regulations.

The Committee concluded that the most probable cause of the incident was a defective fuze that was attached to the 155mm shell which was loaded into the gun howitzer. The defective fuze resulted in the premature explosion. After the incident, the lot of fuzes from which the defective fuze came was X-rayed. 1.3% of the fuzes were found to be defective.

This defective lot of fuzes was supplied by the Chartered Ammunition Industries (CAI) to MINDEF under an agreement in 1992. CAI was to supply fuzes manufactured according to internationally accepted military specifications. These military specifications require thorough inspections and other quality control measures during and after the manufacturing process to eliminate all defects in the fuzes.

CAI, in turn, contracted with a U.S. company, Island Ordnance Systems (IOS), for the supply of these fuzes. Without the knowledge of CAI, IOS obtained the fuzes from Xian Dong Fang Machinery Factory in the People's Republic of China (PRC). In October 94, CAI discovered that the fuzes were manufactured at the factory in the PRC rather than in the USA. However, CAI did not notify MINDEF of this discovery. MINDEF only became aware that these fuzes were manufactured in the PRC during the Committee of Inquiry proceedings in Mar.

When the fuzes were delivered to CAI, IOS issued a Certificate of Compliance and a Certificate of Conformance to confirm that the required military specifications had been met. Sample testing of the fuzes was also conducted by CAI during which no defective fuzes were found. Based on these Certificates, MINDEF accepted the fuzes from CAI.

MINDEF is responsible for ensuring that all types of ammunition and fuzes used in the SAF are safe. MINDEF does so by conducting acceptance testing of ammunition and fuzes either by itself or by reliable contractors. In this case, MINDEF had engaged CAI to provide the SAF with the fuzes. In particular, CAI agreed to witness the acceptance tests for the fuzes, on behalf of MINDEF. However, CAI did not witness all the acceptance tests. CAI also did not check whether the factory in the PRC was able to manufacture the fuzes according to the required military specifications.

To prevent defective fuzes from being introduced into the SAF inventory again in future, MINDEF will completely revamp the current acceptance process. MINDEF has also ceased using all types of ammunition and fuzes from IOS. MINDEF will also not accept ammunition and fuzes manufactured by Xian Dong Fang Machinery Factory.

MINDEF will continue to use 155mm fuzes of this type which have been made by a different manufacturer. As an added precaution, all such fuzes will be X-rayed. With these precautions in place, the SAF resumed live firing with the 155mm guns in May.

MINDEF will be pursuing the appropriate legal remedies that may be available against the parties involved in the supply of the defective fuzes.

MINDEF has compensated the families of the two deceased SAF servicemen and will compensate the injured servicemen in accordance with existing regulations.

MINDEF will be nominating various SAF and New Zealand personnel for appropriate awards in recognition of their acts of bravery and professionalism during the incident.
 

merlion_CB

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/jssd/2017-11-24/doc-ifypathz5681385.shtml

韩国亚洲第一重炮20多次炸膛 每次开炮都是生离死别
2017年11月24日 19:04 新浪军事


新浪扶翼 行业专区
  前些天土耳其军队的一辆M-60T主战坦克在射击时发生了炸膛事故,于是坦克的炮管就成了这个样子,很多网友说这造型非常帅气。各国军事媒体讨论这次事故的时候,马上第一时间想到今年8月份的另一次更加惨烈的大炮炸膛事故。8月18日,韩国陆军进行火炮实弹射击训练时发生爆炸事故,造成1名士兵死亡,6人重伤。此次发生事故的,是韩军自称“亚洲第一炮”的韩国K-9自行榴弹炮。

6fuF-fypatmw5951553.jpg

  韩国K-9自行榴弹炮是韩国自行研制的先进火炮,是亚洲地区第一款采用52倍口径身管的155毫米大威力火炮,被韩国人自豪地称为“亚洲第一炮”。今年4月印度刚刚以6.46亿美元总价引进100门K-9榴弹炮。与K-9榴弹炮同级别的韩国KH179式155毫米牵引榴弹炮,就是出了名的“炸膛大户”,多次发生爆炸事故。2005至2015年的十年内,这种155毫米炮居然出现过20多次炸膛事故,造成上百名炮兵的死伤,是真正的“炮兵杀手”。有韩国老兵曾描述,每一次开炮射击,都仿佛生离死别。那么,为何韩国火炮发生如此之多的炸膛事故呢?

  炸膛是一种非常严重的枪炮事故,火炮炸膛除了会对炮本身造成损坏之外,也会严重威胁到炮手的生命安全。

  炸膛原因有很多种,当火炮炮管的质量较差,内径做工不规则,有弧度,或者保养不好,当一根炮管在经过很多很多次射击后,接近到寿命,在炮管管壁出现了小裂纹,这些小裂纹在高温高压燃气作用下突然断裂,都容易产生炸膛事故。

ulCQ-fypceiq1367031.jpg

  炮弹发射药异常,炮弹的储藏时间接近理论寿命,或者储藏方法低于标准储藏要求,弹头生锈,炮膛内有异物,在弹头正常运动时突然卡住,都容易引发炸膛。炸膛最常见的原因是发射药威力的不规则变化,温度和火炮温度不匹配,导致炮管结构强度不足,无法承受发射药高压燃气,导致炮管破裂。

M5QS-fypatmw5951568.jpg

  还有个情况是炮弹的弹带出现异常。炮弹的弹带是紫铜的,很软,可以嵌入膛线,发射时带动炮弹在身管内旋转。正常情况下,炮弹出膛后,弹带会因高速旋转而在飞出炮口数十米以后碎裂开。例如上图就是中国海军的76毫米舰炮炮弹,弹带在出膛以后破裂飞溅,导致的一排水柱。

  如果火炮的炮膛内存留异物,或者弹带在炮管内断裂,火药燃气会通过缝隙跑到了炮弹的前部,对引信发生冲击,从而引起了膛炸。

mQNB-fypatmw5951575.jpg

  这是前几年乌克兰炮兵在进行实弹射击表演时的殉爆。

ytHy-fypatmu9171396.jpg

  今年5月初,美国交付给印度两门M777式155毫米榴弹炮,让印军试用。结果被印度自己玩炸膛了一门,500万美元就这么没了。  

mtUC-fypatmw5951590.jpg

  2014年,在哈萨克斯坦举行的俄罗斯2014国际军事竞赛,在进行迫击炮训练时,参赛安哥拉炮兵的120毫米迫击炮发生炸膛事故,造成1人重伤,9人轻伤。 

REBw-fypatmu9171403.jpg

  为了加农炮和榴弹炮在冷炮发射时炸膛或发生危险事故,第一次冷跑发射要用拉火绳发射,以防止炸膛和炮翻。这时候发射药的温度不恒定,炮膛温度较低,容易影响精度。火炮驻退机和复进机都没有被良好的润滑,火炮底板和驻锄与土地结合也不严密。导致火炮的技术状态和稳定性都比较低,很容易发生炸膛或掀翻炮位等事故,如果首发射击时炮手站在火炮旁边使用击发机,在发生炸膛或掀翻事故时容易伤及炮手。

R4Ll-fypatmw5951598.jpg

  相对于野战榴弹炮,主战坦克所使用的坦克炮的炮弹都是随车贮藏,发射药的温度很容易保持一致。另外,现代先进坦克炮的炮管,大多数是高膛压炮管,由精炼高强度钢材经过锻压制成,通过身管自紧技术,可以承受高达700多MPa的高膛压,加工精度也高。并且成品验收时还要经受现代探伤技术的检验,全新的炮管出现质量问题的可能性不大。所以坦克炮基本不怕冷炮发射。

sOTC-fypathz5680661.jpg

  不过也有例外的,各国军队坦克炮发生炸膛事故的现象也有很多。例如这个,韩国K1主战坦克的炸膛事故。(作者署名:科罗廖夫)
 
Top