but tbf nobody play 2 loose. its always play 2 win, tat is unless u r man united. n i m not ib hor.
It's not about winning or losing. It's about by the people, for the people & with the people & Moral compass.why choose 2 loose when u can win 4 sure?
Why fear any check and balance on its power if the PAP is an honest govt?
The check and balance is the electorate...and 65% approve..so its ok no issues
PM Wong declared that the 65% have given the PAP a clear mandate to continue the plunder $$$.
Yup so I don't blame ah Wong. I blame the voters
A complete fairness is to abolish the GRC, all constituency to be SMC all MP are elected by the people, not free riding.
The PAP uses the GRCs to bring in inexperienced candidates into Parliament by riding as passengers on the bus driven by senior politicians like Cabinet members deployed to each PAP-held GRC. The GRC scheme also disadvantages opposition parties, by raising the threshold to find sufficient candidates with the political expertise and capability to contest GRCs. The scheme means that electors have unequal voting power, weakens the relationship between voters and MPs and entrenches racialism in local politics owing to its emphasis on minority representation.
Do not forget. The wankers have won GRCs but SMCs have not been won by oppies in decades
Placing the Elections Dept under the Prime Minister's Office creates a serious conflict of interest and an appearance of bias. The PM as the leader of the ruling party, has a vested interest in the outcome of the elections. By having the Elections Dept report to the PM's Office, the govt controls the very body that draws electoral boundaries, updates voter rolls and administers the election process. This erodes public trust in the electoral process and makes it difficult for the opposition to compete on a level playing field.
They had the system rigged from day one. Unfortunately, we can only blame our coolie genes ancestors, Boomers, Gen x and even Millennials. It takes 2 to clap regardless we like it or not. If I can afford to emigrate, I would have. This system is not sustainable beyond 100 years.
I wouldn't even give it 100 years.
