Modi wants to send more disgusting CECAS before can agree to RCEP

[CPTMiller]

Chinese too scared to compete with CECA professionals.
With mat rempits, they can arrogantly insult humiliate, discriminate anyhow they like.
Meritocracy bullshit when all kinds of hindrance were created to bar Malays in work places.
Now with CECA, they say no need for meritocracy. Stop them from coming in. They are taking our jobs. Can't compete, get out! Go live in the slums of wuhan.

We have muslim malay president chosen to lead Singapore.
What more Malays not happy about?
They should be delighted.
If you think malays was shortchange.
You should approach your leader halimah surely get helped

 

[zhihau]

A keling by the name of Bodidharma started the martial world in China , he is still prayed to as a god in China as well as other SEA countries ...so no surprises here too

Kungfu probably originated from Karalipayattu, an ancient martial arts formulated near a seaside area of Kerala...

 

[Nice-Gook]

Kungfu probably originated from Karalipayattu, an ancient martial arts formulated near a seaside area of Kerala...

 

[mudhatter]

We have muslim malay president chosen to lead Singapore.
What more Malays not happy about?
They should be delighted.
If you think malays was shortchange.
You should approach your leader halimah surely get helped

That is also an Indian, and chosen by eunuch loong, to toe the line. Essentially to be the scapegoat everytime anything goes wrong.

Malaysia provide vernacular education, MCA, MIC, DAP other chink/ceca exclusive political party, representation in parliament, media, jobs etc

all favour chinks
still slanties can dare complain
while it's proven fact that not only in stinkypura with chink majority but even in malaysia with chink minority, it's the chinks who are favoured for employment

seen in anonymous resumes sent with melayun name, chink name, ceca ah neh name but all other characteristics remained mostly unchanged

fake chinks received most responses



Survey: Malay, Indian jobseekers likely to face discrimination
Thursday, 07 Mar 2019 12:10 PM MYT
By Syed Jaymal Zahiid

Cent-GPS researcher Zaidel Baharuddin speaks about the result of a recent survey entitled ’Racism in Recruitment: Racial Bias For Entry Level Jobs’ March 7, 2019. — Picture by Choo Choy May

KUALA LUMPUR, March 7 — Malays and Indians are more likely to experience discrimination when applying for jobs in the private sector, especially men of the two ethnicities, a survey by a think tank found.


The Centre for Governance and Political Studies said its study concluded that Malays and Indians face more hurdles to secure job interviews compared to Mandarin-speaking Chinese applicants who topped all callback rates from hiring companies.

The survey was an experimental study in which Cent-GPS researchers posed as seven different applicants from all three major ethnic groups, but with the same qualifications and other criteria deemed necessary to make them prime candidates.



stinkypura obviously faaaaaar worse



Survey: Indians and Malays feel discriminated against in job applications in Singapore


Wednesday, July 31st 2019


According to a survey conducted by the Institute of Policy Studies and OnePeople.sg, a national body for inter-racial and inter-religious understanding in Singapore, a large number of Malays and Indians in the island nation feel discriminated against while applying for jobs.
The findings of the paper titled IPS-OnePeople.sg Indicators of Racial Religious Harmony: Comparing Results from 2018 and 2013 were released on Tuesday.
According to the report, 73 per cent of Malays and 68 per cent of Indians felt that they had experienced discrimination when it came to applying for a job - a figure that has increased since 2013. In contrast, only 38 per cent of Chinese expressed the same sentiment.

Courtesy: Institute of Policy Studies, Singapore
This may partly be due to greater awareness of the presence of discriminatory behaviour in the workplace and how this might have affected some minorities, researchers Mathew Mathews, Leonard Lim and Shanthini Selvarajan said in the paper.

Courtesy: Institute of Policy Studies, Singapore
In total, 4,015 Singaporeans and permanent residents were polled on issues ranging from aspects of their racial and religious identity, to their experiences of living in a multi-racial society, and their attitudes towards social and political issues.

Courtesy: Institute of Policy Studies, Singapore
One People.sg has said that it will work with employers through the Singapore National Employers Federation, and the Tripartite Alliance For Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP) - to address racial discrimination at work.




what's worse is stinkypura is a one party state
with no protests no demonstrations permitted, not even more than 5 people congregation in public
dynastic one party rule eunuch brigade cronyism nepotism kleptocracy plutocracy
with 160th media

nothing like malaysia whatsoever,
even within such constraints, the truth some times seems to gush out no matter how repressive pap-pigs policies might be

Singapore’s Malay Dilemma
They continue to be left out of the island republic’s prosperity

Jun 29, 2020

10

By: Murray Hunter
There has always been a feeling among Singapore’s ethnic Malays that they are second-class citizens within their own land. The government’s endless pursuit of building a strong sense of a Singaporean national identity has come up short within the 750,000-odd Malays who make up 13.5 percent of the population.
A paradox of communal introspection exists, a cognitive dissonance between being a Malay and being a Singaporean. However, this remains largely unspoken about today, particularly among the younger generation.
The Singaporean constitution recognizes the special position of the Malays, who are officially defined as the indigenous people of Singapore. This section also gives the government the responsibility to protect, safeguard, support, foster, and promote their political, educational, religious, economic, social and cultural interests, and their language.


Although Malays have progressed with the growing affluence of Singapore, Malays still earn 25 percent less than the national average, lagging far behind ethnic Chinese and Indians. Malays are still participating in higher-education below par with the rest of the Singaporean population, leading to a great under-representation within the professional classes, elite government positions, armed forces and police. Malays have a much higher incidence of obesity, hypertension, diabetes, heart conditions and other fatal diseases, than the rest of the population.



What’s more, Malays have been blamed for this in the public media as having a cultural deficit, being stereotyped as undertaking unhealthy cultural practices.


They suffer discrimination in hiring, are the first group laid off due to business shutdowns from Covid-19 restrictions, are over-represented in crime, drug abuse and the prison population. Even with their status protected by the constitution, Malays are seriously hindered by regulations restricting the operation of traditional small-scale business enterprises (Niaga kecil/gerai) from home. Consequently, the incidence of social and economic poverty in Singapore falls primarily on ethnic Malays, with a prevailing sense of anguish within the community.


The constitution states that there shall be no discrimination against citizens of Singapore on the basis of religion, race, descent or place of birth in any law or in the appointment to any office under a public authority or in the administration of any law relating to the acquisition, holding or disposition of property or the establishing or carrying on of any trade, business, profession, vocation, or employment.

However, the government’s ethnic integration program (EIP) and Housing Development Board (HDB) policy of allocating apartments within estates to reflect the multiracial composition of Singapore society has totally ignored the cultural context of the Malay kampong. This sense of community, a pillar of Malay culture, has been totally destroyed.

Racial marking within HDB estates has institutionalized ethnic identity, leading to discrimination. This has brought restrictions upon Malays buying and selling apartments in HDB estates, effectively marginalizing them within the housing market.


Within the Singapore Armed Forces discrimination is blatant. In 1987 Lee Hsien Loong, then second minister of defense, said “if there is a conflict, if the SAF is called upon to defend our homeland, we don’t want to put any of our soldiers in a difficult position where the emotions for the nation may come into conflict with his emotions for religion, because these two very strong fundamentals, and if they are not compatible, then they will be two very destructive forces in opposite directions.”



In 1999, Lee Kwan Yew himself echoed the same sentiments about the conflict of interest Malays might have if Singapore was in conflict with Malaysia. However, Singapore’s Malays had a long tradition of service in the armed forces under British colonial command. Removing them from combat positions into logistics and administration has been very difficult to accept. Subtle methods like using Mandarin at higher ranks act as steep barriers to entry for Malays. This feeling of mistrust erodes any sense of national unity and true Singaporean identity. Malays are deeply dissuaded from pursuing any career within the armed forces. This is a stark contradiction to claims of meritocracy in government.


It’s not just within the armed forces. Many Malays feel discriminated against within the general workforce according to repeated workplace surveys that have found around three-quarters of them feel ignored when applying for jobs. Many say that education, language proficiency (i.e. Mandarin speakers required) and race are negative attributes in job interviews. The organization One People.sg has argued that not enough has been done through employers to address the issue, a major area the government needs to focus upon.


The ban on the wearing of head scarfs or hijabs, is regarded as discriminatory against Malay culture and religion. Despite that, protests and petitions on the ban at government workplaces and schools over the last decade have gone unheeded. This issue led to a backlash against the Singapore mufti, or Islamic jurist, who was perceived as appeasing the official government line, rather than taking an Islamic stance on the issue. The Malay community has perceived the government to stand as chauvinistic, as the wearing of the hijab is totally acceptable in many other non-Muslim country civil services and uniformed services around the world.



The Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura (MUIS) is given power by the constitution is the consulting council to advise the president of Singapore on matters regarding Islam, the religion of ethnic Malays. However, the members of the board are appointed by the government, rather than being directly elected by Singapore’s Islamic community.



As Asia Sentinel has reported, there is currently a major inquiry going on concerning corruption within the body’s halal certification operations. In addition, there have been criticisms about the way MUIS has handled Wakaf (donated) property zakat, and Haj cancellations and refunds. The Auditor General’s report uncovered financial mismanagement and interest payments (riba) prohibited under Islamic law used within organizational financial operations. An outpouring of social media posts shows Singapore Muslims’ trust in MUIS is waning amid calls to make MUIS an independent body.
One of the recent and most controversial issues is the position of the president of Singapore, held since 2017 by the long-serving PAP politician and lawyer by profession Halimah Yacob. With the new powers given to the office of president, PAP stalwarts argue that ethnic Malays now have power within the government. However, executive government in reality makes all major decision. The office is still primarily a ceremonial position. Halimah is only the second Muslim to become the president since Singapore became an independent state in 1965. Many ethnic Malays feel that they have been patronized, not seeing any reforms under her reign.
One of these issues is a proposal to teach Bahasa Malay in primary schools, as Malay is the national language and language of Singapore’s national anthem. Inaction has brought rebuke against the president and Malay MPs representing their community, leading to accusations from Malays Underrepresented in Singapore (MUIS) that the representatives are just puppets of the governing People’s Action Party.
There is only one ethnic Malay serving in cabinet, and one in the ministry, while representation within the judiciary and upper echelons of the civil service is far below the ethnic Malay proportion of the population. Criticism is rife about Malay leaders not engaging with the community and speaking up on Malay issues.
An initiative recently announced by Zulkifly Masagos Mohmad, the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources, is a planned program to be led by the minister of state for manpower and national development Zaqy Mohamad, called Ciptasama@M3 to supposedly encourage the community to participate in policymaking. However, an explanation of the program indicates that it plans to focus on issues such as marital problems, support for families of former prisoners and mentoring youths with agencies such as MUIS, MESRA, and MENDAKI, rather than directly with government. This looks more like an outreach set of programs than policy consultation with the ethnic community.
Singapore has been socially engineered by government to reflect the core beliefs of top leaders over the past six decades. In 1990, although Singapore celebrated its 25th anniversary with the slogan “One people, one nation, one Singapore,” the government implemented a new national ideology that stressed the core values of Confucian morality, family loyalty, and placing the nation before oneself. This was a turning point away from multi-culturalism and towards a form of Chinese chauvinism that made Malays feel insecure.
There is, however, a very small group of elite and successful Malays who have ostensibly succeeded under Singapore’s meritocracy system. As part of the professional elite, they can network with the decision-makers within society, having thrown away the mental shackles of Malay customs to project a pan-Singaporean persona of professionalism. They are the pinup heroes for the cause of meritocracy promoted by the PAP.
The potential to advance themselves requires compromise by the government or sacrifice by ethnic Malays. Malay heritage within the armed forces, police, and civil service has been taken away from them. The kampong has been destroyed and scattered, with traditional business opportunities put out of reach. 9/11 and the rise of ISIS have only made things more difficult for as the security services watch the community closely. The stereotypes have not been broken by a Muslim president. Further, their position in the country’s ethnic mix is being quickly eroded due to immigration. After almost 60 years, Malay loyalty to Singapore is still in doubt by the government.
A number of Malays have emigrated from Singapore to countries like Australia, to become very successful in their professions or business. They have embraced their Malay identities and played major roles in organizing local Malay communities in their adopted countries, as great loss for Singapore.

The feelings about these issues are best summed up by Singaporean poet Alfian Sa’at’s words:
“Singapore you are not my country”:
“Your words are like walls on which truth is graffiti
This has become an island of walls
Asylum walls, factory walls, school walls, the walls of the midnight Istana.”

A request to the minister Masagos and his press secretary for an interview has gone unanswered. Lee Hsien Loong as deputy prime minister said back in 2000 that “There is no policy too sensitive to question, and no subject so taboo that you cannot even mention it.” There are many who want to discuss the Malay quandary in Singapore, but fear to do so.

 

[apophylliso]

India got shit fake degrees arseholes and nothing else. Cheats are not welcome.

But PACP is their back door to get in and spread to other countries.

Fuck PAP..

lol lol lol... see which monkey toking cok here.oh is you.
shameless prick...

ur ccp chink score no better or worst then india .
watch guys..

 

[apophylliso]

Of course they hv brains to cheat, lies and betray.... And raped their dotters and mothers...

oh well ..SHAMELESS PRICK...

SEEMS LIKE your ccp mother ceebuy land dun do well in moral education either.lol lol lol

SON KILL MUM FOR MONEY.PUKE...

 

[apophylliso]

well the indians got the heart to save dogs....



down there in ccp cb motherland ...we witness ccp chink killing dogs by smashing their head hard.



dogs lovers...dun watch if u cant take it.
cb ccp farkers.... and wumao
tanwahtiu will have a bad karma.

 

[mudhatter]

Here is the most disconcerting part


Study Shows Malay & Indian Grads Still Face Discrimination Despite Being Mandarin-Speakers
Cent-GPS sent 3,829 job applications from seven candidates of different ethnicities for the study.

By Samantha Khor — 07 Mar 2019, 05:51 PM

• #news
• #jobseekers
• #jobseeking
• #privatesector
• #survey
• #CentreforGovernanceandPoliticalStudies
• #CentGPS
• #career
• #racism
• #discrimination

Cover image via Twitter @Cent-GPS
Are employers in Malaysia truly in need of Mandarin-speakers... or is it simply a smokescreen to mask racism?
Those are the questions Cent-GPS, a KL-based behavioural and social science research firm, sought to answer in its recent study of racial bias in the private sector.

Cent-GPS - short for Centre of Governance and Political Science - modelled its study after research papers by local academics Dr Muhammad Abdul Khalid and Hwok-Aun Lee, both of whom have been studying discrimination in the country's workforce for years.

The think-tank's website names UMNO Senator Khairul Azwan Harun as one of the key people behind it, alongside Dr. Hamidin Abdul Hamid (Deputy Dean of Universiti Malaya's Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences) and Dr. Renard Siew.


Over the past few months, Cent-GPS sent 3,829 job applications to over 500 jobs. For each job vacancy, the team submitted resumés from seven candidates representing different genders and ethnic groups:

1. Nur Sakinah binti Yusof, a Malay female;
2. Zulaikha Asyiqin binti Rashidi, a Malay female;
3. Kavitha Mutusamy, an Indian female;
4. Nicola Yeoh, a Chinese female;
5. Thivakar Gunasekaran, an Indian male;
6. Gabriel Liew, a Chinese male; and
7. Muhammad Saddiq Azmi, a Malay male.

To level the playing field, all seven resumés had similar qualifications:
- They all had a Bachelor's degree in Business;
- They all had the same CGPA level (Second Class Upper);
- They were all fresh graduates from a local private university;
- They all served a three-month internship at a reputable institution;
- They all resided in Kuala Lumpur or Selangor;
- They were all fluent in English and Malay; and most importantly,
- They all had "intermediate" proficiency in Mandarin.
Passport-sized photos of the candidates were also inserted in the resumé.




Here's where things got interesting - the candidates' photos were actually of the same person!





Image via Twitter @CentGPS

Make-up was applied to both the male and female "candidates" to suit their assigned ethnicity, but they all had the same physical features to ensure that no one candidate was better looking than the other.

Hence, the only differences between the seven resumés were their names and the candidates' skin colour.
Now, let's take a look at Cent-GPS' key findings:

1. Both male and female Chinese candidates obtained more callbacks for interviews compared to their Malay and Indian peers combined

Image via Twitter @Cent-GPS (edited)
Female Chinese (FC) candidate Nicola received 240 callbacks out of 547 jobs applied to (43.88% callback rate), while male Chinese (MC) candidate Gabriel received 179 (32.72%).

The three lowest scoring candidates are Indian female (IF) candidate Kavitha with 49 callbacks (8.96%), followed by Malay male (MM) candidate Saddiq (43 callbacks, 7.86%), and Indian male (IM) Thivakar with a dismal 20 callbacks (3.66%).

Image via Twitter @CentGPS
2. To put things into perspective, FC Nicola just had to apply for two jobs to get a callback, while IM Thivakar only received one callback out of 27 job applications

Image via Twitter @CentGPS
3. The "Mandarin-speaking requirement" is just a smokescreen to hire Chinese candidates
Remember, all candidates had listed their Mandarin proficiency as "intermediate" in their resumés.

And yet, FC Nicola and MC Gabriel received far more callbacks (54.72% and 39.62% callback rates respectively) from Mandarin-required companies. In fact, less than 10% of the companies Malay female (MF) candidate Zulaikha and IM Thivakar applied to responded to their applications.

Image via Twitter @CentGPS
4. A Malay female candidate who is not wearing a hijab is more likely to get a callback compared to one who wears hijab

Image via Twitter @CentGPS
Zulaikha (who did not wear a hijab) got a callback from 13% of the companies she applied to, while hijab-wearing Nur Sakinah only had a 9.14% callback rate.

As such, Zulaikha had a 40% advantage over Nur Sakinah despite having the similar resumés and qualifications.
Cent-GPS' study draws a devastating picture of job prospects for candidates of different ethnicities in the private sector, especially for fresh graduates of Indian and Malay descent
"It shows us just how discriminatory our private sector really is. Even as candidates had the same qualifications, education and experience, the ethnicity of a candidate still plays a vital role in the success of a job application," the firm wrote in a press statement sent to SAYS.
"If this trend continues, many more will be marginalised simply due to the colour of their skin. Hard-working Indian and Malay students will not get the opportunity they deserve, creating a dangerous future of inequality and social instability."
Just a few months ago, a landlord in Penang refused to rent a room to a man of mixed Chinese and Indian parentage:
This Chindian Man Was Told He Was Not Chinese Enough To Rent A Room In Penang
"I thought I would qualify by virtue of my IC and name," he said.

Read the full story
Since the incident blew up, ministers have been calling for legislation to prevent such discriminatory practices in real estate and the job market:
Penang Minister Calls For Anti-Racial Discrimination Law After "Chinese Only" Rental Case
He said such acts go against the foundations of peace and unity in Malaysia.

Read the full story
Syed Saddiq Wants Probe For Language-Specific Job Ads In Industries That Don't Need It
The Youth and Sports Minister was present at a dialogue with students at Universiti Malaysia Pahang yesterday, 18 Feb...




@whoami @syed putra @Loofydralb other melayu and ah neh and eurasians and any others that are here
even cina should be able to spot the obvious

fact is, even in malaysia, let alone cina majority stinkypura, the majority melayu face discrimination
quite clearly proven

 

[whoami]

Here is the most disconcerting part


Study Shows Malay & Indian Grads Still Face Discrimination Despite Being Mandarin-Speakers
Cent-GPS sent 3,829 job applications from seven candidates of different ethnicities for the study.

By Samantha Khor — 07 Mar 2019, 05:51 PM

• #news
• #jobseekers
• #jobseeking
• #privatesector
• #survey
• #CentreforGovernanceandPoliticalStudies
• #CentGPS
• #career
• #racism
• #discrimination

Cover image via Twitter @Cent-GPS
Are employers in Malaysia truly in need of Mandarin-speakers... or is it simply a smokescreen to mask racism?
Those are the questions Cent-GPS, a KL-based behavioural and social science research firm, sought to answer in its recent study of racial bias in the private sector.

Cent-GPS - short for Centre of Governance and Political Science - modelled its study after research papers by local academics Dr Muhammad Abdul Khalid and Hwok-Aun Lee, both of whom have been studying discrimination in the country's workforce for years.

The think-tank's website names UMNO Senator Khairul Azwan Harun as one of the key people behind it, alongside Dr. Hamidin Abdul Hamid (Deputy Dean of Universiti Malaya's Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences) and Dr. Renard Siew.


Over the past few months, Cent-GPS sent 3,829 job applications to over 500 jobs. For each job vacancy, the team submitted resumés from seven candidates representing different genders and ethnic groups:

1. Nur Sakinah binti Yusof, a Malay female;
2. Zulaikha Asyiqin binti Rashidi, a Malay female;
3. Kavitha Mutusamy, an Indian female;
4. Nicola Yeoh, a Chinese female;
5. Thivakar Gunasekaran, an Indian male;
6. Gabriel Liew, a Chinese male; and
7. Muhammad Saddiq Azmi, a Malay male.

To level the playing field, all seven resumés had similar qualifications:
- They all had a Bachelor's degree in Business;
- They all had the same CGPA level (Second Class Upper);
- They were all fresh graduates from a local private university;
- They all served a three-month internship at a reputable institution;
- They all resided in Kuala Lumpur or Selangor;
- They were all fluent in English and Malay; and most importantly,
- They all had "intermediate" proficiency in Mandarin.
Passport-sized photos of the candidates were also inserted in the resumé.




Here's where things got interesting - the candidates' photos were actually of the same person!





Image via Twitter @CentGPS

Make-up was applied to both the male and female "candidates" to suit their assigned ethnicity, but they all had the same physical features to ensure that no one candidate was better looking than the other.

Hence, the only differences between the seven resumés were their names and the candidates' skin colour.
Now, let's take a look at Cent-GPS' key findings:

1. Both male and female Chinese candidates obtained more callbacks for interviews compared to their Malay and Indian peers combined

Image via Twitter @Cent-GPS (edited)
Female Chinese (FC) candidate Nicola received 240 callbacks out of 547 jobs applied to (43.88% callback rate), while male Chinese (MC) candidate Gabriel received 179 (32.72%).

The three lowest scoring candidates are Indian female (IF) candidate Kavitha with 49 callbacks (8.96%), followed by Malay male (MM) candidate Saddiq (43 callbacks, 7.86%), and Indian male (IM) Thivakar with a dismal 20 callbacks (3.66%).

Image via Twitter @CentGPS
2. To put things into perspective, FC Nicola just had to apply for two jobs to get a callback, while IM Thivakar only received one callback out of 27 job applications

Image via Twitter @CentGPS
3. The "Mandarin-speaking requirement" is just a smokescreen to hire Chinese candidates
Remember, all candidates had listed their Mandarin proficiency as "intermediate" in their resumés.

And yet, FC Nicola and MC Gabriel received far more callbacks (54.72% and 39.62% callback rates respectively) from Mandarin-required companies. In fact, less than 10% of the companies Malay female (MF) candidate Zulaikha and IM Thivakar applied to responded to their applications.

Image via Twitter @CentGPS
4. A Malay female candidate who is not wearing a hijab is more likely to get a callback compared to one who wears hijab

Image via Twitter @CentGPS
Zulaikha (who did not wear a hijab) got a callback from 13% of the companies she applied to, while hijab-wearing Nur Sakinah only had a 9.14% callback rate.

As such, Zulaikha had a 40% advantage over Nur Sakinah despite having the similar resumés and qualifications.
Cent-GPS' study draws a devastating picture of job prospects for candidates of different ethnicities in the private sector, especially for fresh graduates of Indian and Malay descent
"It shows us just how discriminatory our private sector really is. Even as candidates had the same qualifications, education and experience, the ethnicity of a candidate still plays a vital role in the success of a job application," the firm wrote in a press statement sent to SAYS.
"If this trend continues, many more will be marginalised simply due to the colour of their skin. Hard-working Indian and Malay students will not get the opportunity they deserve, creating a dangerous future of inequality and social instability."
Just a few months ago, a landlord in Penang refused to rent a room to a man of mixed Chinese and Indian parentage:
This Chindian Man Was Told He Was Not Chinese Enough To Rent A Room In Penang
"I thought I would qualify by virtue of my IC and name," he said.

Read the full story
Since the incident blew up, ministers have been calling for legislation to prevent such discriminatory practices in real estate and the job market:
Penang Minister Calls For Anti-Racial Discrimination Law After "Chinese Only" Rental Case
He said such acts go against the foundations of peace and unity in Malaysia.

Read the full story
Syed Saddiq Wants Probe For Language-Specific Job Ads In Industries That Don't Need It
The Youth and Sports Minister was present at a dialogue with students at Universiti Malaysia Pahang yesterday, 18 Feb...




@whoami @syed putra @Loofydralb other melayu and ah neh and eurasians and any others that are here
even cina should be able to spot the obvious

fact is, even in malaysia, let alone cina majority stinkypura, the majority melayu face discrimination
quite clearly proven

I have lots of relatives all over Msia. Def i have 1st hand news. I had mentioned many times MALAYsian cheena r racist. They only stick to their own community. Majority speak Mandarin n have poor knowledge of bahasa Melayu! They dont integrate well with the Malays. Wat more Indians. They only take in Cheena candidates even though some non cheena able to READ n WRITE Mandarin. Yes..able to write. No BS. Msia is a Muslim country. So puttg on a tudung is the norm. Like i always mentioned cheena MALAYsian shld exit, migrate to Cheena speakg countries like Chicom, Sinkieland, HK, Roc etc etc. So many countries to go. Spoilt for choice. Wtf still stay in MALAYsia????

Cheena complained y civil service only accept bumis. Kpkb discrimination. But actual fact is cheena dont integrate well with Malays in the civil service. Also complain pay too low. Civil service jobs opened to all races. So whos been tellg lies? Btw cant stand the sight of Muslims then pack ur bag n leave lah! We dont need racist cheena in MALAYsia. Shoo shoo....

 

[tanwahtiu]

Hey jiuhu kia u, fuck back to jiuhu lah.... dickhead....

I have lots of relatives all over Msia. Def i have 1st hand news. I had mentioned many times MALAYsian cheena r racist. They only stick to their own community. Majority speak Mandarin n have poor knowledge of bahasa Melayu! They dont integrate well with the Malays. Wat more Indians. They only take in Cheena candidates even though some non cheena able to READ n WRITE Mandarin. Yes..able to write. No BS. Msia is a Muslim country. So puttg on a tudung is the norm. Like i always mentioned cheena MALAYsian shld exit, migrate to Cheena speakg countries like Chicom, Sinkieland, HK, Roc etc etc. So many countries to go. Spoilt for choice. Wtf still stay in MALAYsia????

Cheena complained y civil service only accept bumis. Kpkb discrimination. But actual fact is cheena dont integrate well with Malays in the civil service. Also complain pay too low. Civil service jobs opened to all races. So whos been tellg lies? Btw cant stand the sight of Muslims then pack ur bag n leave lah! We dont need racist cheena in MALAYsia. Shoo shoo....

 

[batman1]

Only SG agree with India over CECA....why other countries don't leh ? Malu lah Singapura

Modi got SG by the balls.

 

[syed putra]

Its only fair if you have free movement of goods, there should be free movenent of workers

 

[Loofydralb]

Study Shows Malay & Indian Grads Still Face Discrimination Despite Being Mandarin-Speakers

Let's call a spade, a spade.

This is inherently a racist country, chinese superiority discrimination complex

 

[tanwahtiu]

Yr donkey party is taking over WH w fake democrazy can only get u to commit crimes to fill the lawyers court cases book for the year... dumbwit...

oh well ..SHAMELESS PRICK...

SEEMS LIKE your ccp mother ceebuy land dun do well in moral education either.lol lol lol

SON KILL MUM FOR MONEY.PUKE...

 

[apophylliso]

shameless ccp china steal n steal.... shame.lazy to innovate.. not smart enough to invent...only is to steal.

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

15 countries sign RECP except India which wanted “movement of professionals”

by Correspondent

16 November 2020

Reading Time: 3min read

The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) was signed by 15 countries yesterday (15 Nov), which provides progressively lower tariffs across many areas in the coming years.
It’s the world’s biggest trade agreement involving 10 ASEAN countries along with China, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand and Australia. Together, the 15 countries make up nearly a third of the world’s population and account for 29 per cent of global GDP.
PM Lee hailed the signing of the RCEP as a major milestone. He said yesterday, “The RCEP is a major step forward for the world, at a time when multilateralism is losing ground and global growth is slowing… I have no doubt that the RCEP is a plus for all of us.”
However, 6 ASEAN and 3 non-ASEAN countries have yet to officially ratify the mega agreement. RCEP will only come into force when these countries have ratified the agreement through their respective parliamentary process of their countries.
India pulls out of RECP

The only country which pulled out of RECP during negotiation was India. It pulled out of RECP talks officially last Nov. When India decided to pull out, its industry leaders lauded the move (‘Exporters, industry laud India’s decision to pull out of RCEP‘, 5 Nov).
The elated chairman of Engineering Export Promotion Council of India, Ravi Sehgal, told the media then, “We welcome the decision in opting out of RCEP… Our MSME unit members were concerned about the possible opening up to Chinese imports; and hence it is a wise decision (to pull out).”
Federation of Indian Export Organisations president Sharad Kumar Saraf said, “Duty-free imports from China, which has economy of scale, and sitting on huge inventory and capacity could have jolted the (India’s) manufacturing beyond recovery and thus crippling exports.”
Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) president Sandip Somany told the media also, “Serious apprehensions and reservations on RCEP have been expressed by a large number of sectors including steel, plastics, copper, aluminum, machine tools, paper, automobiles, chemicals, petrol-chemicals and others.”
And added, “Further, there were not enough positive developments in the area of trade in services, including easier mobility for our professionals and service-providers.”
India wants “movement of professionals” but was rebuffed

Indeed, the “movement of workers” clause was a major contention between India and other member countries in the RECP talks. In 2016, India started to pose veiled threats in pulling out of RECP if it couldn’t get concessions in “exporting” its workers out of India.
It was slowly abandoning any further negotiations on trade in goods till there was progress in the area of liberalizing trade in services, including movement of professionals. India informed the other RECP member countries that further negotiations on trade in goods would depend on the progress of negotiations in services trade, especially in the area of “movement of workers”.
At the time, some of the member countries were already resisting India’s push for a deal in services trade. An Indian official told the media in India that no country had offered anything worthwhile in Mode 4 of services (“movement of workers”) in the first round of offers exchanged between the members. “On the other hand, most members are aggressive in goods, and intensive discussions on give and take are happening in the area,” he added.
As talks progressed to 2017, India expressively showed its disappointment over the inadequate progress in talks on services trade liberalization especially for facilitating easier movement of professionals across countries (‘RCEP: India upset over slow progress on services talks‘, 23 May 2017).
India’s Commerce Minister Nirmala Sitharaman told the media at the time, “Progress in negotiations on services is not keeping pace with the kind of progress seen in goods negotiations.” In return for eliminating or reducing tariffs on goods, India wanted the other RCEP member countries to work toward liberalization across all modes of services, including movement of professionals.
India is, of course, always keen that any free trade agreements should also ensure easier “movement of professionals”, since it is a “leading services supplier” in the world with a large pool of “skilled workers”.
Finally, with the “movement of professionals” stalled at RECP talks as well as fear of China, India finally pulled out of RECP last year.
Nevertheless, PM Lee said he hopes that India will be able to come on board at some point so that “the participation in the RCEP will fully reflect the emerging patterns of integration and regional cooperation in Asia”

Indian politicians are very clever.
Want to protect their domestic market and want to export their workers to other countries.

WHY ARE SINGAPORE PAP MINISTERS ARE SO STUPID?

 

[congo9]

They want free trade. Indian free trade is like this.
They want all the domestic market byitself. They also want the export market for themselves too. That's free trade. All advantage and no disadvantage

 

[Leckmichamarsch]

One atomic bomb to clear all that filth. Fuck India.

..............................................covid 19 n 21 will do fine

 

[mudhatter]

I have lots of relatives all over Msia. Def i have 1st hand news. I had mentioned many times MALAYsian cheena r racist. They only stick to their own community. Majority speak Mandarin n have poor knowledge of bahasa Melayu! They dont integrate well with the Malays. Wat more Indians. They only take in Cheena candidates even though some non cheena able to READ n WRITE Mandarin. Yes..able to write. No BS. Msia is a Muslim country. So puttg on a tudung is the norm. Like i always mentioned cheena MALAYsian shld exit, migrate to Cheena speakg countries like Chicom, Sinkieland, HK, Roc etc etc. So many countries to go. Spoilt for choice. Wtf still stay in MALAYsia????

Cheena complained y civil service only accept bumis. Kpkb discrimination. But actual fact is cheena dont integrate well with Malays in the civil service. Also complain pay too low. Civil service jobs opened to all races. So whos been tellg lies? Btw cant stand the sight of Muslims then pack ur bag n leave lah! We dont need racist cheena in MALAYsia. Shoo shoo....

 

[mudhatter]

Let's call a spade, a spade.

This is inherently a racist country, chinese superiority discrimination complex

anywhere slanties are there, the same observation holds true
surprisingly in malaysia where melayun are majority, you have the chinks still discriminating against natives melayus and ah nehs and others

how can anybody explain that?


mindboggling really they still manage to remain ignorant about it or feign ignorance with a straight face.