• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Trump doesn't want muslims to enter USA!!!

Agoraphobic

Alfrescian
Loyal
Whilst recent terrorist activities by Islamic groups have created a reaction towards Islam, Donald Trump is seen here to go the extreme. He may be voicing out the sentiments of some, but how do the citizens of USA take to a national leader who is emotionally charged? It is perhaps expected of a regular Joe to make a statement like "Kill 'em all!" - but is this acceptable for a president? If what he says comes true, and is enacted, the Saudi royalty will not be allowed to visit Yankeeland? Muslim students from Malaysia will not be allowed to enter US universities? Donald Trump may appeal to some - I read comments by some who are impressed that he "Speaks his mind" but how wide-reaching is this type of style? At this time, Trump does not come across as president material. The other Republican candidate unfortunately is a Bush! Looks like the best candidate for the next US president may be a woman. Perhaps it is time for that to happen.

Cheers!

http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/...-complete-shutdown-muslims-entering-us.html-0

Trump calls for 'complete shutdown' on Muslims entering US

Jill Colvin and Bruce Smith, The Associated Press, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina | World | Tue, December 08 2015, 12:16 PM

Donald Trump has called for a "total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States," a dramatic escalation of his rhetoric on Islam and an idea widely condemned by his rival Republican candidates for president and others in the Republican Party.The Republican front-runner's proposed ban would apply to immigrants and visitors alike, a sweeping prohibition affecting all adherents of a religion practiced by more than a billion people worldwide. He said in a statement such a ban should stand "until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on.""Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life," he said.Trump's 2016 presidential campaign has been marked by a pattern of inflammatory statements and he kicked off his campaign with a speech in which he said some Mexican immigrants are rapists and criminals. He recently drew criticism for retweeting an image of inaccurate statistics that vastly overrepresented the number of whites killed by blacks. But so far those and other errors of fact have not diminished his popularity among many Republican voters.At an evening rally in South Carolina, Trump supporters cheered and shouted in support as he read his statement and warned that without drastic action, "it's going to get worse and worse, you're going to have more World Trade Centers."Rod Weader, a 68-year-old real estate agent from North Charleston who attended the rally and said he agreed with Trump's plan "150 percent.""As he says, we have to find out who they are and why they are here," he said.Since the Nov. 13 attacks in Paris that killed 130 people and wounded hundreds more, a number of Republican presidential contenders have proposed restrictions on Syrian refugees — with several suggesting preference for Christians seeking asylum — and tighter surveillance in the U.S.But Trump's proposed ban goes much further, and his Republican rivals were quick to reject the latest provocation from a candidate who has delivered no shortage of them. "Donald Trump is unhinged," former Florida governor Jeb Bush said via Twitter. "His 'policy' proposals are not serious."John Kasich slammed Trump's "outrageous divisiveness," while a more measured Ted Cruz, who has always been cautious about upsetting Trump's supporters, said, "Well, that is not my policy."Trump's plan also drew criticism from the heads of the Republican Party in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina, the first three states to vote in next year's presidential primaries."It is un-Republican. It is unconstitutional. And it is un-American," said Jennifer Horn, chairwoman of the Republican Party of New Hampshire.Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski said Trump's proposed ban would apply to "everybody," including Muslims seeking immigration visas as well as tourists seeking to enter the country.In an interview on Fox News, Trump said Muslim members of the U.S. armed forces would "come home" and that his plan would "not apply to people living in the country."In the late 1800s, Congress passed legislation broadly aimed at halting Chinese immigration. But said Leti Volpp, a University of California expert on immigration law, "there is no precedent for a religious litmus test for admitting immigrants into the United States.""Excluding almost a quarter of the world's population from setting foot in the United States based solely upon their religious identity would never pass constitutional muster," Volpp said.Trump's proposal comes a day after President Barack Obama spoke to the nation from the Oval Office about the shootings in San Bernardino, California, which Obama said was "an act of terrorism designed to kill innocent people."The FBI said Monday the Muslim couple who carried out the massacre had been radicalized and had taken target practice at area gun ranges, in one case within days of the attack last week that killed 14 people."Donald Trump sounds more like a leader of a lynch mob than a great nation like ours," said Nihad Awad, national executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. "He and others are playing into the hands of ISIS. This is exactly what ISIS wants from Americans: to turn against each other."
 

bigboss

Alfrescian
Loyal
At this time, Trump does not come across as president material.

On the contrary, the US needs a strong minded and determined bloke like Trump to kick ass to eliminate the ISIS. He might not have meant to ban all Muslims from entering USA; it would be foolish and impractical to do so. Obviously, he wanted more stringent screening of all Muslims entering his country, and this is what all sensible leaders should do.

When the EU opened their doors to mass immigration for Syrians and Africans, the ISIS just masok as well. How many ISIS sympathisers or jihadists are now legally in EU? Time will tell when another massacre occurs in EU.

The pappies should be taking a serious look at their current policy of allowing foreigners to walk into the island seeking jobs and SPR. How many of them are ISIS sympathisers or jihadists from Syria, Iraq or Pinoy land?

As usual, the pappies will not wake up until it is too late ... the story of rioting in Little India need not be repeated.
 

Devil Within

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
USA should lead by example and ban Muslims and Islam from it's shore. Others will follow if they can see the benefit of no Muslim in it's country. There will be true peace and no need for halal nonsense and ninja dress code.
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This move by trump is good. After the Paris attacks then the San Bernardino then the London knife attacks etc when does it stop
 

Thick Face Black Heart

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
America does not need Muslims. It is Muslims who need America. Why should there be a free pass for any person in the world to enter the USA or in fact any country without first proving he or she is willing to conform to that country's norms?
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
America does not need Muslims. It is Muslims who need America. Why should there be a free pass for any person in the world to enter the USA or in fact any country without first proving he or she is willing to conform to that country's norms?

Sinkies and jiuhukias refused to conform to the shitty norms of this region. Most of us refuse to learn and speak m&d or practice Islam.
 

Devil Within

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Actually, this is all election talk. Once election is over, everything will be back to business as usual.

USA will not be able to ban Muslim even if Trump become the President. USA need Saudi Arabia for its' middle east agenda even though Saudi is one of the biggest behind-the-scene supporter of Islamic terrorists.

Trump is just playing his "tough guy" role in this election. Once election is over, everything will be the same. Just look at Obama and his so-called "change".
 

Thick Face Black Heart

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Sinkies and jiuhukias refused to conform to the shitty norms of this region. Most of us refuse to learn and speak m&d or practice Islam.



You must be daft. The early settlers of the 19th century worked hard and transformed the region from 3rd world to 1st. Their positive norms transformed the region into a bustling metropolis even before the Japanese occupation. Your social studies textbooks are telling you that only LKY did that. That's why you make such a simple history mistake.
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
ill vote Trump for the next Singapore Prime minister if he promises to build a wall to keep the roaches and pests out.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
You must be daft. The early settlers of the 19th century worked hard and transformed the region from 3rd world to 1st. Their positive norms transformed the region into a bustling metropolis even before the Japanese occupation. Your social studies textbooks are telling you that only LKY did that. That's why you make such a simple history mistake.

The m&d textbooks says nothing of that sort. The transformation of Malaya to a developed Malaysia was spearheaded by Muslims, supported by chinks and neh coolies. As for Singapore, even a child knows that LKY and PAP was primarily responsible for the transformation of Singapore to a First World country.
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
The m&d textbooks says nothing of that sort. The transformation of Malaya to a developed Malaysia was spearheaded by Muslims, supported by chinks and neh coolies. As for Singapore, even a child knows that LKY and PAP was primarily responsible for the transformation of Singapore to a First World country.
It was the aNg moh who built up the region. the others were merely workers. That includes Singapore as well where would lky be if not for English education.
 
Top