• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Lawless Wong, like a rabid dog, rants against WP

dr.wailing

Alfrescian
Loyal
The ministar has not finished ranting against WP.

This time he wrote directly to our state-controlled media, under the false impression that the latter is highly regarded and considered to be the fount of truth by Sinkies. Lawless Wong hopes that his troll post will win daft Sinkies with his baseless arguments.

Smart Sinkies are wondering why Lawless Wong does not file a criminal complaint with the relevant authorities; instead he is taking the law into his own hands, making himself the arbiter of truth.

Click the following link to read his rant, The Straits Times, June 13, 2015, Handling of town council saga speaks volumes of dishonesty, page A46: http://postimg.org/image/kyk7p6117/
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Sylvia better sue ...challenge the Wong clown to restate his defamatory statement. Right now, Wong clown will claim that he is merely restating the judge's conclusion. I am sure that Wong clown has distorted the judge's ruling.

If the judge's claim that these 'lapses' by the TC is criminal in nature when committed by others but not to TC, then the PAP is shown by the judge as incompetent in passing the laws on TC. Why did the PAP pass a law that allows TC to escape criminal charges? Was the law intended to allow PAP TCs to makan money?
 

xingguy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
1h2Wl7v.jpg


1424326_677646502268340_266701563_n.jpg
 

NanoSpeed

Alfrescian
Loyal
Sylvia better sue ...challenge the Wong clown to restate his defamatory statement. Right now, Wong clown will claim that he is merely restating the judge's conclusion. I am sure that Wong clown has distorted the judge's ruling.

If the judge's claim that these 'lapses' by the TC is criminal in nature when committed by others but not to TC, then the PAP is shown by the judge as incompetent in passing the laws on TC. Why did the PAP pass a law that allows TC to escape criminal charges? Was the law intended to allow PAP TCs to makan money?

You have to give credit to Sylvia & Co. WP is not biting the bait. There is no guarantee that WP will win in court if a defamation suit is filed. The biggest blow is Lawless is not a judgment from the court, but secretly plotting for another GRC to fall, especially Lawless' GRC.
 
Top