People with integrity do not allow themselves to sodomised.
Seatless bicycle got count?
People with integrity do not allow themselves to sodomised.
This shows how dangerous gays can be; esp when in the position of power and authority. Priest or no priest.
It is not the fault of the church that some priests were gay or whatever; i mean how could they tell. There is no gay test when they entered priesthood.
Maybe gays are attracted to this calling since they are surrounded by altar boys and monks!
It is precisely the numerous cases of sexual abuse that the church has to speak out against this abnormal behaviour.
There is no gay test when they entered priesthood.
Maybe gays are attracted to this calling since they are surrounded by altar boys and monks!
I'm not talking about crotch grabbing. I'm saying that people who indulge in sodomy have no integrity.
Interesting. What does the choice of orifice for penetration have anything to do with integrity?
So do vaginal fuckers have more integrity than fellaters? And fellaters more than sodomizers? What about female vs male sodomizers? Any difference?
Don't confuse 'morally equipped' with criminal allegation.
VW brought up the incident not to point to his 'molest' or 'abuse' or 'damaged'. He did it to show that if the Church couldn't or wouldn't even police its own priests from homosexual-paedophilic activity, it has lost its moral standing to make a stand on the LGBT issue. And it's a world-wide phenomenon involving the Catholic Church and the highest levels of clergy, including some prominent cardinals and bishops.
At no point did he make any allegation of specific sexual abuse or criminal activity (against himself) by any priest. 'Attempt to touch' and 'looking at porno magazines' don't qualify as sexual abuse. What's there to investigate?
You said: ... almost touched my kukubird. Is that considered abuse?
Vincent said: ... attempt to touch my crotch. Is that considered abuse?
To the faggot or faggot lover who zapped me 100 points for my views on faggotism and for using the term "faggots" to describe, well, faggots, this is my message to you.
I don't care two hoots about points. What I do want is to post what I want to post without any hindrance or censorhip because of this point system. If the host so decides that what I post or how I post is not in accordance to the tenor of this forum, he and he alone as owner of this forum, should call me out or shut me out.
This forum, as I have known it since the 90s, has always been a rough and tumble, no-holds barred forum. If anyone and everyone takes offense at anything or everything said or how they are said, this forum would come to a grinding halt or it would be like the many half-fucked faggoty forums out there. All prim, proper and polite but with nothing substantive and with collective IQs bordering from mild retardation to below average.
Unless the forum's tenor has changed and Sam wants the culture to be faggotified with the clink of wine glasses each time something is said, do stop this limpwrist zappings.
I can take as much as you can give so long as it is not in my arse as I am not a faggot.
Likewise, be prepared to take as much as I will give. I promise when I give, it won't be in the arse as I am not a faggot. So you will be safe if you are normal. Or disappointed, if you are a faggot.
I may not like what you say at all but I have upped your points to cancel off those who zapped you, which is most likely the work of kopiuncle, theblackhole, ilovesingapore and lionheart
Unless the forum's tenor has changed and Sam wants the culture to be faggotified with the clink of wine glasses each time something is said, do stop this limpwrist zappings.
VW ... ..... down.
VW did not claim to be molested but chose to highlight an incident of sexual misconduct. The Church asked him to lodge a report but conveniently used the term "molest" to shape his response. I think he made an error of judgement. It has cost him dearly and will continue to cost him dearly.
After the comment about the church in Facebook, there is no coming back at least for now.
Now the Church is no angel.
The point about a few black sheep within the Catholic Church raised by some no longer holds water. The Church has been an active party in covering up, failing to contain and address this deviant conduct over many decades. Where it had be raised they have merely moved the priest in question from one location to another. Even when the numbers of victims exceeded the tens, the same approach is used. No consideration to the damage dome to the young and vulnerable, the very people they are supposed to help.
The Church has repeatedly refuse to act on its own accord until political and public pressure begins to bear on it. Even till today that has been their approach - ignore first, then followed by a cover-up and then a series of protracted measures to let time to wear the victim and their supporters down.
Actually VW is right lah. There is no abuse when he enjoyed it. He must thank the priest for making his "awakening".