I am really intrigued by this. I hope VW had considered all the consequences. Good luck to him!
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Vincent Wijeysingha does not give a shit what you think
- Thread starter metalmickey
- Start date
intrigued by where his cock will enter?
The older generation are passing on and there will always be conservative minded people. What I fear are the stupid minded people! I mean, here we have VW. Intelligent, fearless, sincere, open and even likeable! Can you find these attributes in ....ohh.....you know who!
i wonder what NS mates are thinking now with VW's admission
Well this thread was also partially started to address the gay issue because I know that there are homophobic people in sammy boy.
Personally I find it easy to accept gay people. While I think that fucking my ass is definitely out of bounds, I'm quite comfortable with the idea that they are fucking each other's asses. Some people get squirmish about using foul language, and other people don't care. It's just like that for gay people also.
I've had a few friends I've known since we were kids and they turned out to be gay. They are ordinary people. Smart people, dumb people, nice people, not so nice people. Feminine people, masculine people. And in many cases, it's impossible to tell by looking.
People sometimes equate gays with ah kuas. Ah kuas are not gays. I'm not free from bias - I feel a little creepy about ah kuas. I don't think that gay people choose to be gay, but being an ah kua is voluntary. Gays are more like left handed people. In a way they are freaks, but the freakishness is so minor it doesn't matter at all. I wouldn't say "those left handed people are so gross" because that's stupid.
Of course I treat them different. I don't anyhow put my arm around a girl and similarly I don't anyhow put my arm around a person I know is gay. I don't care about being in a shower with a gay guy but I'd be extremely concerned if I see his cock standing up. To me they are not female but neither are they entirely male.
It's very amusing when I hear some higher ups in a company I used to work for - they're ex-generals who have a homophobic attitude, but they look up to Apple and want to model the company around Apple. Do they not know the guy who took over from Steve Jobs is gay?
There are people who question whether the gay issue is important. Of course it's important to people who are gay. Chinese people think that Indian or Malay issues are not that important. Announcing to the world that you are gay is a ritual which is increasingly common, and is called "coming out". If you are left handed, it's not a secret. If you are female, it is not a secret. If you are an Indian / Chinese / Ang mor it is not a secret. So why should the fact that a person is gay be a secret? Around 5% of people are gay so whatever it is you are surrounded by gay people like it or not.
As for the question of gay people in national service - the world's most powerful armed forces, the US military has just announced that they accept people who are openly gay. It's not an issue and should never have been one in the first place. The idea that gay people are less effective military leaders was debunked almost 2000 years ago by Alexander the Great who is still regarded as one of the greatest generals of all time.
Personally I find it easy to accept gay people. While I think that fucking my ass is definitely out of bounds, I'm quite comfortable with the idea that they are fucking each other's asses. Some people get squirmish about using foul language, and other people don't care. It's just like that for gay people also.
I've had a few friends I've known since we were kids and they turned out to be gay. They are ordinary people. Smart people, dumb people, nice people, not so nice people. Feminine people, masculine people. And in many cases, it's impossible to tell by looking.
People sometimes equate gays with ah kuas. Ah kuas are not gays. I'm not free from bias - I feel a little creepy about ah kuas. I don't think that gay people choose to be gay, but being an ah kua is voluntary. Gays are more like left handed people. In a way they are freaks, but the freakishness is so minor it doesn't matter at all. I wouldn't say "those left handed people are so gross" because that's stupid.
Of course I treat them different. I don't anyhow put my arm around a girl and similarly I don't anyhow put my arm around a person I know is gay. I don't care about being in a shower with a gay guy but I'd be extremely concerned if I see his cock standing up. To me they are not female but neither are they entirely male.
It's very amusing when I hear some higher ups in a company I used to work for - they're ex-generals who have a homophobic attitude, but they look up to Apple and want to model the company around Apple. Do they not know the guy who took over from Steve Jobs is gay?
There are people who question whether the gay issue is important. Of course it's important to people who are gay. Chinese people think that Indian or Malay issues are not that important. Announcing to the world that you are gay is a ritual which is increasingly common, and is called "coming out". If you are left handed, it's not a secret. If you are female, it is not a secret. If you are an Indian / Chinese / Ang mor it is not a secret. So why should the fact that a person is gay be a secret? Around 5% of people are gay so whatever it is you are surrounded by gay people like it or not.
As for the question of gay people in national service - the world's most powerful armed forces, the US military has just announced that they accept people who are openly gay. It's not an issue and should never have been one in the first place. The idea that gay people are less effective military leaders was debunked almost 2000 years ago by Alexander the Great who is still regarded as one of the greatest generals of all time.
I don't see people who have a problem with gay people as being "conservative". I see them as being "wrong".
I mean, obviously inserting a dick into a part of a body that you use to shit is gross in a way that inserting it into a part of the body that you use to pee isn't.
It a matter of fact everyone knows he is a gay. Nothing to hide or evade. The more u try to do so, the more your opponent will want to capitalize on it.
Now VW is sending the message 'I am gay and so what?'
It is a known fact and a non-issue, it was all over the MSM during GE2011. Yet WP fanboys who have been making the nastiest comments about VW are suddenly surprised.
The TNP has done a survey during GE2011 and 76% would not mind if their MP is gay.
http://www.tnp.sg/content/spore-ready-gay-mp
VW and his team won 40% of the votes.
Even the PAP has no issues with gays. Lee Kuan Yew has no problems with having homosexuals in Parliament.
http://sgwiki.com/wiki/Lee_Kuan_Yew's_views_on_homosexuality
Charles Chong: "PAP candidates have never been asked to declare our sexual orientation. MM is right in saying an MP should be judged purely on his performance, and not on his sexual orientation."
PM Lee Hsien Loong lost his temper on Chua Mui Hoong and asked her to stop it when she asked about VW's orientation, replying that qualification is not unimportant either.
If there is an issue, it is the re-electability of WP. It has been rocked by scandal after scandal. Many of the ones squealed by WPwhistleblower have not even made it to the MSM yet.
WP fanboys are trying to make SDP look bad so that WP would look good. Will it work?
The TNP has done a survey during GE2011 and 76% would not mind if their MP is gay.
http://www.tnp.sg/content/spore-ready-gay-mp
VW and his team won 40% of the votes.
Even the PAP has no issues with gays. Lee Kuan Yew has no problems with having homosexuals in Parliament.
http://sgwiki.com/wiki/Lee_Kuan_Yew's_views_on_homosexuality
Charles Chong: "PAP candidates have never been asked to declare our sexual orientation. MM is right in saying an MP should be judged purely on his performance, and not on his sexual orientation."
PM Lee Hsien Loong lost his temper on Chua Mui Hoong and asked her to stop it when she asked about VW's orientation, replying that qualification is not unimportant either.
If there is an issue, it is the re-electability of WP. It has been rocked by scandal after scandal. Many of the ones squealed by WPwhistleblower have not even made it to the MSM yet.
WP fanboys are trying to make SDP look bad so that WP would look good. Will it work?
Last edited:
Yes I do. He's a doctor, driver and police all rolled in one. What about him?
He was gay but he didn't flaunt his ailment.
So, he was a gay doctor, driver and police all rolled in one, not a problem! He performed well in his job just the same.
Yes, the dick should only be used to poke the virgina. It is unnatural for dicks to find pleasure anywhere else, especially the mouth, hands, and asshole. All forms of non virgina sex should be outlawed. Ethics and social morals police must be empowered to catch people engaging in unnatural sex.
It was VB who raised this issue during GE11 and after that pretend as if it was a non-issue.
It a wise strategy.
If the poll is anything indicative, 76% don't mind doesn't mean they will vote for VW. But the 24% who minds was almost certain they won't support VW. So all PAP needs to do it to send a subtle reminder to the 24% that there is a gay candidates on the other camp. At the same time they don't overplay this issue just to avoid the JG mistake.
My guess is at the end of the day, it still a net gain for PAP on this.
Last edited:
MM ok with gays but not ok with Muslims?
Similar threads
