• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Makapaa - cb sabo king!

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jun 21, 2010
Messages
34,891
Points
113
You knn backside itchy dig up old thread.
I dunno blur blur replied in the thread kena boss infraction.
Knn zap you!
Believed Khun Ying and laksaboy should have kena also.
Zap the bugger!
 
Haha, lesson learned. Look at the date before reply.:D
 
You knn backside itchy dig up old thread.
I dunno blur blur replied in the thread kena boss infraction.
Knn zap you!
Believed Khun Ying and laksaboy should have kena also.
Zap the bugger!

What's wrong with bringing back old thread and what's wrong with replying to it?? Everything happens for a reason, it dont just happen.
 
You knn backside itchy dig up old thread.
I dunno blur blur replied in the thread kena boss infraction.
Knn zap you!
Believed Khun Ying and laksaboy should have kena also.
Zap the bugger!

He was the thread starter. He didn't dig it up. That was done by cunnilaubu. You should zap him instead.

I've infracted you again for making unfounded accusations against an innocent party.
 
You knn backside itchy dig up old thread.
I dunno blur blur replied in the thread kena boss infraction.
Knn zap you!
Believed Khun Ying and laksaboy should have kena also.
Zap the bugger!

My apologies, bro. My fault. Saw it on the top of the Courtyard forum. Didn't check the date cos didn't expected an old thread to appear on the top.
Thought only new messages came on top. Apparently wasn't the case.
 
Last edited:
Ah Sam!
Reply old thread is also not allow? Why

Accuse wrong party agree!
 
My apologies, bro. My fault. Saw it on the top of the Courtyard forum. Didn't check the date cos didn't expected an old thread to appear on the top.
Thought only new messages came on top. Apparently wasn't the case.

I like your nick!:D Honest mistake. Master of this forum is SIAO!;):D Like that also kena. KNN, when i free i go and copy all old threads and repost again! New date mah. :D
 
Ah Sam!
Reply old thread is also not allow? Why

Accuse wrong party agree!

It's allowed but it's not encouraged. It messes up the chronological order of events.

Imagine the confusion if someone dug up 100 old threads a day. It used to be done by troublemakers during the good old Delphi days for the sole purpose of vandalising the forum.

If it's done for a valid reason because the issue is still relevant, I have no problems with that.
 
You knn backside itchy dig up old thread.
I dunno blur blur replied in the thread kena boss infraction.
Knn zap you!
Believed Khun Ying and laksaboy should have kena also.
Zap the bugger!
LOL, you damn suay, lol
 
... Imagine the confusion if someone dug up 100 old threads a day ...
ze systemz dig up o threads n display dem under similar threads ...

sum forummers here may not haf noticed ze dates ... n click on dem, read n den reply ...

mayb u want 2 do sum tweaking ...
 
sum forummers here may not haf noticed ze dates ... n click on dem, read n den reply ...

If you don't notice a car when you're crossing the road, you'll be run over.

If you don't notice the date when replying to a thread, you'll be infracted.
 
If you don't notice a car when you're crossing the road, you'll be run over.

If you don't notice the date when replying to a thread, you'll be infracted.
lousy analogy! ...

a car got driver, can notice u n horn u n avoid u ... threads dun haf ... :rolleyes:
 
My apologies, bro. My fault. Saw it on the top of the Courtyard forum. Didn't check the date cos didn't expected an old thread to appear on the top.
Thought only new messages came on top. Apparently wasn't the case.

Since you have been identified as the "first" person in line to have dug up the old thread, maybe you can tell us more how on earth did an old thread appear on the top?
 
Leongsam;1062853.....I've infracted you again for making unfounded accusations against an innocent party.[/QUOTE said:
This must be the greatest joke of the century in Cyber World!

You should also zap all those buggers in this Forum because everyday they have made innumerable "unfounded accusations " - against the most "innocent party" of all - the People's Action Party and its key cabinet members.
 
If you don't notice a car when you're crossing the road, you'll be run over.

If you don't notice the date when replying to a thread, you'll be infracted.

lousy analogy! ...

a car got driver, can notice u n horn u n avoid u ... threads dun haf ... :rolleyes:

Yeah, lousy analogy! I notice the car but not the car number.

Since you have been identified as the "first" person in line to have dug up the old thread, maybe you can tell us more how on earth did an old thread appear on the top?

Not sure really. Saw the thread on top, click on it, read and replied. Just that.
I have not purposely dig up old thread. Didn't do any search. If I had done that, I suppose the log would have shown.
 
Not sure really. Saw the thread on top, click on it, read and replied. Just that.
I have not purposely dig up old thread. Didn't do any search. If I had done that, I suppose the log would have shown.

You're suggesting that it's an entrapment !
 
If you don't notice a car when you're crossing the road, you'll be run over.

If you don't notice the date when replying to a thread, you'll be infracted.

middlefingerkid2.jpg:D:D:D:oIo::oIo::oIo::oIo::oIo:
 
If you don't notice a car when you're crossing the road, you'll be run over.

If you don't notice the date when replying to a thread, you'll be infracted.

Wah, Sam is more PAP than PAP itself!

The next thing he will infract you is for chewing gum while typing a reply to this forum.

I was given two infraction points by Alamaking recently for the most ridiculous reasons - things that appear daily in this forum. And since he gave me something, I'm was obligated to write to him to "Fuck You!". Points do not make any significant impact on what I wish to say.

Sam has come up with a faulty system of infractions by "seniors" who apparently set up numerous clones to give themselves points or power. It makes those who beg for points look like angels!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top