• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

LKYSPP's IPS unit poll: S'poreans value economic growth over freedom of speech

SNAblog

Alfrescian
Loyal
Insititute of Policy Studies is a unit of Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy. So how credible is this poll?

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/...lue-growth-over-freedom-of-speech-poll-shows/

Singaporeans value growth over freedom of speech, poll shows
May 24, 2011

SINGAPORE, May 24 — The majority of Singaporeans value economic growth over freedom of speech.
But they also believe that there are too many political restrictions, a new survey has found.

Most also agree that Singapore should have a powerful leader who can run the government as he thinks fit.

Yet many also want everyone to be able to criticise the government publicly, the Singapore Straits Times reported today.

According to the newspaper, the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) polled 1,092 citizens aged 21 years and above in July and August last year and found a generation gap in political orientation.

Those aged below 40 displayed a more “liberal” political attitude than those aged 40 to 59, who in turn were generally more liberal than those aged above 60, the newspaper said.

The survey asked respondents to indicate their agreement, or lack thereof, regarding four statements.

Two were “conservative” in nature: “Singapore should have a powerful leader who can run the government as he thinks fit”, and “It is more important to have good economic growth than freedom of speech”.

On these statements, seven out of 10 respondents said they “agreed” or “strongly agreed”.

The other two statements were “liberal” in nature, invoking criticisms which have been levelled at the PAP government: “There are two many rules against participating in political activities in Singapore,” and “Everyone should be given the freedom to criticise the government publicly.”

Six out of 10 agreed or strongly agreed that there were too many rules; five out of 10 agreed or strongly agreed that everyone should be able to criticise the government, the newspaper reported.
 

Spock

Alfrescian
Loyal
“It is more important to have good economic growth than freedom of speech”.

This is brainwashing at its best. What a stupid poll. Was it trying to imply that good economic growth and freedom of speech are mutually exclusive? I see no reason why freedom of speech will mean economic growth is impacted. Perhaps it should be rephrased as "It is more important to have good economic growth than human rights". That will make sense at least as good economic growth does not mean everyone will get to benefit from it, especially not the peasant slaves.
 

SNAblog

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is brainwashing at its best. What a stupid poll. Was it trying to imply that good economic growth and freedom of speech are mutually exclusive? I see no reason why freedom of speech will mean economic growth is impacted. Perhaps it should be rephrased as "It is more important to have good economic growth than human rights". That will make sense at least as good economic growth does not mean everyone will get to benefit from it, especially not the peasant slaves.

Precisely. With this survey, they are trying to suggest that there is a trade-off between economic growth and freedom of speech. Anyway, why should I be surprise since this survey is conducted by a unit of Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy.
 
Top