• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Why only Malay MPs criticise Seng Han Thong? Are they too sensitive?

MarrickG

Alfrescian
Loyal
Another two Malay People's Action Party (PAP) MPs have weighed in on the controversy that erupted over remarks made by fellow MP Seng Han Thong on a TV talk show.

Mr Zainal Sapari and Mr Zaqy Mohamad made separate postings on Facebook on Friday that distanced themselves from Mr Seng's comments that the lack of proficiency in English of Malay and Indian train drivers deterred them from making train announcements.

Mr Seng said he had been refuting a remark by an SMRT officer.

Both Mr Zainal and Mr Zaqy on Friday criticised Mr Seng's remarks, which some Netizens had said were 'racist'.

Mr Zainal, MP for Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC, told The Straits Times when elaborating on his post, that Mr Seng's comments were inappropriate and cannot be condoned.

But, he added, 'it is not fair to label him a racist'.

Having known Mr Seng for seven years, through working together on community activities, he described Mr Seng as 'a good man and not in his nature to make such remarks'.

Mr Zaqy, MP for Chua Chu Kang GRC, calling the comments "unwarranted', said he was 'personally disappointed that Malay and Indian SMRT staff were singled out'.

The saga, he added, shows politicians or public figures 'need to improve our own communication skills, not just the SMRT staff, especially in sensing the ground and sensitivities with respect to beliefs and race'.

When contacted by The Straits Times, he said Mr Seng could have been more attuned to the sensitivities of the Malay community which has just recovered from the shock of recent incidents.

Last month, former PAP youth wing member Jason Neo, 30, made a racist Facebook post of a picture of a bus carrying Malay kindergarten children. He later apologised and quit the party

Within a week, full-time national serviceman Christian Eliab Ratnam posted on his Facebook wall a picture of text criticising Islam. He later apologised online.

On Monday, Mr Seng, a veteran labour MP, sparked an outcry online with his comments. He wrongly attributed it to an SMRT official.

It drew a rebuke from Minister of State for Community Development, Youth and Sports Halimah Yacob, who went on to urge people 'to stay cool as we need SMRT to focus on the big, big issue of fixing the defects'.

Mr Seng has since apologised for his comments, saying he had misheard the SMRT official on the radio while driving.

Another PAP MP, Mr Baey Yam Keng, when contacted, noted that the issue of the poor communication by SMRT during last week's train breakdowns had nothing to do with race.

Hence, he said, 'there was no necessity to make reference to race in this case'.

Mr Baey, MP for Tampines GRC, is managing director of public relations company Hill+Knowlton Strategies.

Like other public communications experts interviewed, he stressed the need for newsmakers to be extra careful and precise when making comments on sensitive topics such as race, religion and ethnicity.

These topics are as sensitive in today's fast-moving social media environment as they were in the non-Internet past, noted Adjunct Associate Professor Basskaran Nair of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy.

Mr Nair, a public relations veteran, had this advice: 'When in doubt, avoid making comments on race and religion, especially off-the-cuff comments.'

MP Zaqy pointed out that being precise means avoiding sweeping statements and to look at issues 'through the eyes of minority segments'.

Dr Vivian Chen, assistant professor at the Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information in Nanyang Technological University (NTU), pointed to the pitfalls when mentioning race.

'When you talk about sensitive issues like race, you have to use neutral terms' because people might 'end up enlarging and interpreting what you say', she said.

Professor Ang Peng Hwa, director of the Singapore Internet Research Centre at NTU, pointed out that in the brouhaha, the point Mr Seng had wanted to make - about poor communications - got lost when attention shifted to ethnicity.

The experts also stressed that mistakes will occur, given the emotional and visceral nature of social media, where comments are easily taken out of context or distorted.

Hence, it is important for Netizens to forgive mistakes, they added.

Like the other experts, Prof Ang said Mr Seng did the right thing by apologising swiftly and he urged Netizens to 'look at the actions of the person, as opposed to just the words that he spoke'.

Similarly, Mr Baey said: 'Hopefully, people will move on... and look at his other contributions as an MP, and not discount anyone just because of one mistake.'

Equally supportive was Mr Zainal, who told The Straits Times: 'It was a mistake, but it is not Mr Seng's intention to put down the Malay and Indian communities.'

[email protected]
 

denzuko1

Alfrescian
Loyal
Seems more like the Malay faction of PAP is unhappy with their leadership and starts thinking for themselves. So even within the party they contradict themselves on whether this burning chap is a racist, PAP is collapsing.
 

Unrepented

Alfrescian
Loyal
They are not too sensitive, but they should get better helicopted and improve their engrish so that they donch misinterpret Mr Seng.:mad:
 

LeMans2011

Alfrescian
Loyal
The main purpose of this whole saga is to divert attention from the main issue ie. fuckup MRT system
Notice people hardly talked about the trains breakdown but focus on Ah Seng instead.
Sinkies are so gullible!
 

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal
You asked why?

Simple answer is, they've got BALLS! Unlike other castrated MPs.

Zaqy is doing very well and growing his independence. He should be Minister in charge of Muslim affairs instead of that useless Yacob Ibrahim or the spineless Maliki Osman whose impotence shines throughout the smrt saga with his silence.:mad:
 
Last edited:

Capano2121

Alfrescian
Loyal
Mats are just plain wired their way!

1) Given free education all the way & they still do not show a good take up rate!
2) Given equal opportunity, they'll either complain being discriminated upon or pitied upon!
3) Whack them & they'll accused you of being a racially driven bully!
4) Make sure they are able to enjoy all fast food available & they stuck to fried chicken, i really missed Burger Kings' pork bacon!
5) Teach them english at school, they screw the language properly & yet still can't speak their own right!
6) Enable them to climb up the social ladder & stay in condo & they turn the damn place into a kampong!
7) Shaft them into power & they group on their own to fight their own!
 

RonRon

Alfrescian
Loyal
Malay are the easiest to manipulate lot, as long as someone shout racist they will get emotionally charge up and never analyse and care about the actual fact of the story.
 

Leckmichamarsch

Alfrescian
Loyal
Malay are the easiest to manipulate lot, as long as someone shout racist they will get emotionally charge up and never analyse and care about the actual fact of the story.

Can't agree with you more!
See how Mahababi manipulate the melayu's upnorth for decades.... now Najib doing same!

What irks me is that our sg melayu's are playing funny games being ultra sensitive when it was really a trivial matter. Did the Chinese n Indian complain when Yaacob throws parties at the Istana for Malay voters???
 
Top