• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

USA is finished:9 States declare sovereignty

condom_loong

Alfrescian
Loyal
YES Singapore will be the 1st nation to recognize the new separated country from USA. This will lead to 2nd Civil War in USA! :biggrin:
 

imperialarms

Alfrescian
Loyal
LOL are you serious here???

Is there a Hip hop "nation" in the US then? Pray tell where is the location of this hip hop nation?


Of course there is hip hop in Africa. What da hell?:rolleyes:

Where do you think all of black culture originated from? The call and response and the rap, all of this was garnered from african culture and tradition.

Man u should google more and find the number of hip hop, reggae, soca and other generes of music which are popular and founded in the west which are also popular in Africa. :mad:

Ssssh ur not supposed to let forummers know that Scroobal is the resident idiot:biggrin:
 

imperialarms

Alfrescian
Loyal
Imperial, why you post this I dont know. There is no danger of succession, as state soverignety not otherwise guaranteed is at discussion here UNDER THE 10 Amendment of the Federal Constituation, that;s all.

Remember the first ten amendments to the Federal Constituation were the original bill of rights.

Sometimes when we read things online, we need to think for ourselves, too.


No ur wrong, the founders meant for the states to have the right to secession. you need to know what you are talking about. Extrapolating the 10th amendment actually gives states the right to secede, as all rights not given to the state belongs to them. and this includes the right to secede.

In addition, madison and jefferson explicitly mentions the sovereignty of the individual states. Read Federalist paper 39 and 55.

Before becoming president, lincoln himself was a fervent supporter of the right to secede, which of course changed after he became head honcho.

The right to secede is not in question, whether it is economically viable or militarily practical for them to do so is another matter.
 

imperialarms

Alfrescian
Loyal
LOL if say u only lived in a certain part of the US like say the east coast obviously the ppl from that region speak the same. This is obviously not the case. The southern states have many mexicans and spanish is also widely used over there. There are blacks and hispanics whom are feared or mistrusted by the whites etc.

There are also numerous foreigners all over the country. To actually say that the US is homogeneous is very childlike talk. :rolleyes:


there are actually distint differences even on the east coast in say the new york and the philly accent, you could def distinguish it after living there for some time.
 

imperialarms

Alfrescian
Loyal
I conur say if some province in china were to do the same it's possible. Cos u know that's how things are for ppl here.

No matter how US fucks up it's all right. While for everyone else especially china it's not okay.

of coz mah, ang moh worshippers. it is okay for xinjiang tibet to secede, to uphold their right to self-determination, but if new hampshire want to do so, then they will be nuked out of existence by the federal army. this ang moh logic is very unique indeed:rolleyes:
 

Aussie Prick

Alfrescian
Loyal
No ur wrong, the founders meant for the states to have the right to secession. you need to know what you are talking about. Extrapolating the 10th amendment actually gives states the right to secede, as all rights not given to the state belongs to them. and this includes the right to secede.

In addition, madison and jefferson explicitly mentions the sovereignty of the individual states. Read Federalist paper 39 and 55.

Before becoming president, lincoln himself was a fervent supporter of the right to secede, which of course changed after he became head honcho.

The right to secede is not in question, whether it is economically viable or militarily practical for them to do so is another matter.

Uh no YOU NEED TO KNOW YOUR FACTS. If Jefferson thought States had the right to secede its irrelevant due to the Civil War.

Lincoln did not sacrifice thousands of Union Troops to unify the land when Southern States sought to secede WHEN IN FACT THE SOUTHERN STATES OBJECTED TO STATE'S RIGHTS GRANTED BY THE 10TH AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION IN THE FIRST PLACE!

Lincoln did not throw the whole nation into its darkest depths just to allow states the right to secede from the Union. Their independent sovereignity was always guaranteed under the 10th Amendment for their I am laughing at your asinine observations they are quite funny. Just because states have that right, exercising their rights has a precedent! The Civil War!

According to you, Lincoln ignored the Constitution! LOL!

If you dont understand American History nor the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and basic tenants contained therein I suggest you refrain from making such remarks, unless you want to entertain us.
 

imperialarms

Alfrescian
Loyal
Uh no YOU NEED TO KNOW YOUR FACTS. If Jefferson thought States had the right to secede its irrelevant due to the Civil War.

Lincoln did not sacrifice thousands of Union Troops to unify the land when Southern States sought to secede WHEN IN FACT THE SOUTHERN STATES OBJECTED TO STATE'S RIGHTS GRANTED BY THE 10TH AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION IN THE FIRST PLACE!

Lincoln did not throw the whole nation into its darkest depths just to allow states the right to secede from the Union. Their independent sovereignity was always guaranteed under the 10th Amendment for their I am laughing at your asinine observations they are quite funny. Just because states have that right, exercising their rights has a precedent! The Civil War!

According to you, Lincoln ignored the Constitution! LOL!

If you dont understand American History nor the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and basic tenants contained therein I suggest you refrain from making such remarks, unless you want to entertain us.

LOL. do you know what is meant by political expedience??? Did you even know that lincoln did not in fact want to free the slaves initially?

Abraham Lincoln in 1847 on the floor of the United States House of Representatives:

Any people, anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better. This is a most valuable, a most sacred right, a right which we hope and believe is to liberate the world.

after becoming president:

Different story.


sorry to burst your bubble. but u really need to dwell into real acadaemia instead of the trash tabloids
 
Last edited:

Aussie Prick

Alfrescian
Loyal
LOL. do you know what is meant by political expedience??? Did you even know that lincoln did not in fact want to free the slaves initially?

sorry to burst your bubble.

Irrelevant. Lincoln defended the constitution.

Sorry if its embarrassing for you, but its the truth.
 

imperialarms

Alfrescian
Loyal
Irrelevant. Lincoln defended the constitution.

Sorry if its embarrassing for you, but its the truth.


Oh yes he defended the constitution by suspending habeas corpus (which is specifically a power reserved to congress by the constitution) without congressional approval.:rolleyes:
 

Aussie Prick

Alfrescian
Loyal
Oh yes he defended the constitution by suspending habeas corpus (which is specifically a power reserved to congress by the constitution) without congressional approval.:rolleyes:

Instances of true leadership. History has vindicated Mr Lincoln, who is considered one of the greatest statesman of all time.
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
there are actually distint differences even on the east coast in say the new york and the philly accent, you could def distinguish it after living there for some time.



Yes i knew 1 filippino guy from new york and a few black, asians, chinese, jews mostly from philly. The black dude had a philly and black accent mixed in. Pretty unique.


Sounded very different from another new york black.

Oh well.
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
of coz mah, ang moh worshippers. it is okay for xinjiang tibet to secede, to uphold their right to self-determination, but if new hampshire want to do so, then they will be nuked out of existence by the federal army. this ang moh logic is very unique indeed:rolleyes:



I can still understand it if ang mohs said it, but the thing is it's the sinkees here that also follow and agree with this ang moh logic.


The saddest thing is these sinkees are also considered to be chinamen by the ang mohs too, since 40% think sinkeeland is in china, another 30% cannot even find sinkee on the map and the remainder dun even know it exists!:biggrin:
 
Top