• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PAP town councils’ ban on PMDs at void decks, common areas set to take effect from Sept 1

glockman

Old Fart
Asset
They should just allow PMDs to be used by the old and handicapped.

20180708_mf_e-scooter_rider_6601_0.jpg

Any PMD user who violates the rules shall be penalised under the town councils’ amended Common Property and Open Spaces By-Laws.

SINGAPORE — With effect from Sept 1, personal mobility devices (PMDs) will be banned from void decks and all common properties in housing estates run by the 15 People’s Action Party (PAP) town councils.

This follows a review of the town councils’ by-laws, which are subject to approval by the Attorney-General’s Chambers.

The ban will not apply to personal mobility aids such as motorised wheelchairs and mobility scooters. These devices — which have a speed limit of 10km/h and are designed to carry an individual who has difficulty walking — can “continue to move freely in our towns”, said PAP Town Councils coordinating chairman Teo Ho Pin in a statement on Wednesday (Aug 7) where he stressed that residents’ safety remains the town councils’ “top priority”.

Over the last 12 months, the 15 PAP town councils received about 190 pieces of feedback on “reckless behaviours of PMD users” in the estates, Dr Teo said.

“With the surveillance by over 70,000 Polcam CCTVs (closed circuit television cameras installed by the police) and the Lift Surveillance System at void decks and lifts, town councils will be able to identify reckless PMD users and take the necessary enforcement action,” he warned.

Any PMD user who violates the rules shall be penalised under the town councils’ amended Common Property and Open Spaces By-Laws.

Dr Teo said that PMD users are encouraged to practise safe riding habits by dismounting and pushing their devices at void decks and all common properties. “They should also take the necessary fire safety prevention measures when charging their PMDs in their flats,” he added.

“We urge all PMD users and residents to keep a close community watch, promote a gracious and safe environment for all, and join in our efforts to reduce fire and safety hazards in our towns.”

Aljunied-Hougang Town Council, run by the Workers’ Party, is understood to be considering whether to implement the ban in its estates.

The ban was first announced by Senior Minister of State for Transport Lam Pin Min in Parliament on Monday.

As part of moves aimed at reducing the number of PMD-related accidents here, the Land Transport Authority will also launch a three-month trial of pedestrian-only zones in selected town councils and double its enforcement team on the ground to 200 officers by the end of the year.

Dr Lam had also announced that the authorities will bring forward by six months a deadline — to July 1, 2020 — for all vehicles to meet UL2272, a safety standard that will reduce the risk of fires, and make it mandatory for registered electric scooters to be inspected from April next year. This comes after a string of fires sparked by PMDs.

Read more at https://www.todayonline.com/singapo...oid-decks-common-areas-set-take-effect-sept-1
 

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Typical PAP style:

- not enough thoughts go into the start of any scheme. Cowboy country rules for the PMDs from early days would have solved half the problems.
SG is not the first cuntry to have PMDs.
- implement rules and pretending to offer solutions to problems they created in the first place.
- not willing to ever admit that mistakes were ever made; casually announce that implementation rules pushed forward in the name of safety.

Result:
- dealers lose money because of new regulations half-way and after they have imported; they offer cheaply these suddenly illegal machines which
get snapped up and the viscious cycle of accidents continue;
- consumers end up with PMDs which were legal when they bought them but by the stroke of a pen, suddenly find themselves owning scrap metal...
 

AhMeng

Alfrescian (Inf- Comp)
Asset
Question:

1. Does it apply to private condo common areas? Or just HDB?
2. What kind of ranjiao law is this when PAP area cannot pmd and Oppie area can pmd?
 

glockman

Old Fart
Asset
Typical PAP style:

- not enough thoughts go into the start of any scheme. Cowboy country rules for the PMDs from early days would have solved half the problems.
SG is not the first cuntry to have PMDs.
- implement rules and pretending to offer solutions to problems they created in the first place.
- not willing to ever admit that mistakes were ever made; casually announce that implementation rules pushed forward in the name of safety.

Result:
- dealers lose money because of new regulations half-way and after they have imported; they offer cheaply these suddenly illegal machines which
get snapped up and the viscious cycle of accidents continue;
- consumers end up with PMDs which were legal when they bought them but by the stroke of a pen, suddenly find themselves owning scrap metal...
They pride themselves on being the best and the brightest, hence they demand hefty salaries. But they have proven to be slow, reactive and lacking foresight, just like any other 3rd rate government which could be had for a much cheaper price.
 

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This whole exercise of having only the PAP TCs implementing the new regulation reflects yet again that the PAP is really very
insecure, with very small minds. And naive politically. Their mentality remains that of those in oppo wards are their true
enemies and deserve to be hurt.

Enforcement issue will arise (assuming the CAN enforce) particularly those bordering the oppo wards. PMDs may be legally
used on one side of the road, but not on the other because of the "border" of two constituencies.

Much goodwill would have been generated if they had invited oppos to join them for the exercise, and they are seen to be
concerned for ALL citizens. But no, they go round accusing everyone of politicising (only on things that make them look
stupid/sill) but yet they themselves are the biggest culprits of this game.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
We have drivers who can't even drive along a straight road and here we are worrying about the minor problem of e-scooters. :rolleyes:

car_break_fence_and_overturn_at_clementi_road_6.jpg

car_break_fence_and_overturn_at_clementi_road_4_Medium.jpg
 
Top