• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Obama DON'T DESERVE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE

uncleyap

Alfrescian
Loyal
BG PM LEE and MM Lee should volunteer to send 10,000 to even 50,000 of the Singapore soldiers for 3 months to 1 year operation to gain fighting experience.

After 3 years of such operation, most Singapore soldiers will have experince in actual warfare. This is something Singapore can be proud of.

Just imagine, of all the 300,000 reservists and 50,000 full-time army personnels in Singapore, 100,000 of them have real fight experience of at least 3 months. The moving of troops, sniper attacks, ambush, using all the Singapore-designed and make army euipments.

This would help the sale of these battle-tested military equipments. And it will translate to billions of $ of arms sales for Singapore. Then PAP can credit Singapore as a military arms HUB.

With the fighting experince of the Singapore commandos, the combat units, the guards and rangers. the airforce, the navy in the Gulf Singapore Armed Forces will in just 3 years transform from a theory-type-of boys-scout army (a little bit below the Salvation Army) to a experienced fighting force...feared by all its potential enemies.

Go ahead send 50,000 troops to Afganistan. Take it was a realistic training group. Just 3 months and a 2 or 3 gun battles will be enough to train the guts of the Singapore soldiers.

First, deploy a unit of the elite Singapore commandos..about 1,000 of them for 3 months to hunt down the Talibans in the mountians. Getting a few injured or even killed is just a small price to pay for such valuable training.

In a matter of 3 months these 1000 commandos will have the fighting experience. The OCT can have a quick 1 month mission there during their final training before earning their offier rank. The men under them will respect for their fighting experience. PM Lee's 2nd son will be the first to go to set a good example.

Then send in the airforce to bomb the Talibans.

Another 2000 of the Rangers and Guards can be deployed to hunt down the Talibans. Then another 5,000 combat soliders guard the Singapore base and walkl the streets for 1 year.

Then move in the armoured division to fight the Talibans head on.

Wow, just in 3 years, the whole world will begin to have deep respect for Singapore Armed Forces. It will be at par with the Isreali, the British and the U.S. All the Singapore army officers will be experienced fighters.

Ass Loong & his dad were among the 1st suckers to send troops to Iraq to suck up to moron war criminal Bush, and the SAF were also among the 1st coward troops to fled Iraq before hell started to break lose in Iraq.

I challenged old dog thief LKy to have his own 2 BG sons plus 2LT Lee Hong Yi to lead a troop of ALL WHITE HORSE MIW ministers' sons to Iraq, and Walk Their Own Big Talks :biggrin:. They surely chicken out.

Saddam got the balls and died fearlessly, Saddam's 2 sons + favorit grandson (Udi + brother) also fearlessly fought Bush's army to death. This is something that famiLEE LEEgime all lack = BALLS & GUTS. :wink::rolleyes:

Lame bastard famiLEE still want to fulfill their own Ah Beng EGOs, to play Tyrants, they fucking forgot to check the empty space between their own legs for the missing balls! :biggrin:
 

uncleyap

Alfrescian
Loyal
The American media & activists are now adopting (identical with) my position :eek::wink::cool::p:smile:
asking Obama to DECLINE the Nobel Peace Prize.

http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/091011/1/1srid.html

美媒籲拒領和平獎 洛時:歐巴馬似贏實輸

<label> </label> 更新日期:<q>2009/10/11 16:35</q>
挪威諾貝爾獎委員會「大爆冷門」將本屆和平獎頒給美國總統歐巴馬後,引起國際社會嘩然,美國多份立場一向「挺歐」的主流大報也表示質疑,更有聲音呼籲他婉拒領獎。白宮和民主黨也深知獎項實為「燙手山芋」,正努力低調處理此事。


委員會宣布決定後,評論家(霍爾珀林)迅速在網站力陳歐巴馬得獎的五大壞處,包括,獎項會提高公眾對歐巴馬的施政期望;惹起反對者憤怒;激起國內分化;引國際領袖妒忌;以及成為國內輿論的取笑對象。


洛杉磯時報更以「歐巴馬似贏實輸」為題發表社論,指挪威諾貝爾獎委員會「過度讚譽」的決定令得獎者相當尷尬。即使歐巴馬的得獎演說寫得如何謙遜,也難以令人信服這個反常的決定。歐巴馬獲得了「和平諦造者」的榮譽,可是他卻還在指揮著兩場海外戰爭,並正準備增派四萬軍人前往阿富汗打仗。


而美國最受歡迎的政治部落格(赫芬頓郵報)也發表題為「歐巴馬該婉拒獎項」的評論文章,質疑歐巴馬的得獎資格,指他上任不久、還未履行任何競選承諾,在阿富汗和巴基斯坦的戰事更有升溫之勢,「如何確保他日後不會變成一個戰爭販子?」
紐約時報也指這項宣佈時間並不理想,因為他現正飽受國內左右陣營批評,甚至連知名節目(周末夜現場)上周也開始以他為戲謔對象。白宮也明顯希望低調處理此事,將不會大肆慶祝歐巴馬得獎。
 

uncleyap

Alfrescian
Loyal
In a clear comparison, Turkish & Armenian leaders had deserve to get the Nobel Peace Prize much more than Obama, who had been increasing troops into the bloody Afghanistan wars.

http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/091011/16/1sr7u.html

百年世仇和解 土耳其亞美尼亞簽和平協議

<label> </label> 更新日期:<q>2009/10/11 10:39</q>
(路透蘇黎世11日電)第一次世界大戰奧圖曼(Ottoman)帝國軍隊對亞美尼亞人大屠殺造成百年世仇後,土耳其和亞美尼亞今天簽訂歷史性的和平協議,將恢復兩國外交及開放兩國邊界。


但簽約前出現許多意想不到的困難現象,暗示著實際執行將會遭遇的困難。由於雙方在最後一刻對聲明出現歧見,使簽約延遲3小時,迫使美國國務卿希拉蕊.柯林頓(Hillary Clinton)出面緊急協商,尋求雙方達成共識。


土耳其外長達夫托葛魯(Ahmet Davutoglu)及亞美尼亞外長納班迪恩(Edward Nalbandian)在蘇黎世簽約儀式中簽署協議。此事由瑞士斡旋促成。
歐盟主管外交政策最高代表索拉納(Javier Solana)、俄羅斯外長拉夫羅夫(Sergei Lavrov)及法國外長庫希內(Bernard Kouchner)都出席這場簽約儀式。


此協議還必須經兩國國會批准,但雙方均面對國內國家主義者的激烈反對。中央社(翻譯)
 

uncleyap

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091011...jb3JkaW9uX3BvbGl0aWNzBHNsawN3ZWFwb25zZmFpbGU-

capt.1f35ea895798440089dde18f97d2cc4e.afghanistan_weapons_failures_wx301.jpg


Weapons failed US troops during Afghan firefight


<cite class="vcard"> By RICHARD LARDNER, Associated Press Writer Richard Lardner, Associated Press Writer </cite> – <abbr title="2009-10-11T07:31:09-0700" class="recenttimedate">57 mins ago</abbr>
<!-- end .byline --> WASHINGTON – In the chaos of an early morning assault on a remote U.S. outpost in eastern Afghanistan, Staff Sgt. Erich Phillips' M4 carbine quit firing as militant forces surrounded the base. The machine gun he grabbed after tossing the rifle aside didn't work either.


When the battle in the small village of Wanat ended, nine U.S. soldiers lay dead and 27 more were wounded. A detailed study of the attack by a military historian found that weapons failed repeatedly at a "critical moment" during the firefight on July 13, 2008, putting the outnumbered American troops at risk of being overrun by nearly 200 insurgents.


Which raises the question: Eight years into the war against the Taliban in Afghanistan, do U.S. armed forces have the best guns money can buy?


Despite the military's insistence that they do, a small but vocal number of troops in Afghanistan and Iraq has complained that the standard-issue M4 rifles need too much maintenance and jam at the worst possible times.


A week ago, eight U.S. troops were killed at a base near Kamdesh, a town near Wanat. There's no immediate evidence of weapons failures at Kamdesh, but the circumstances were eerily similar to the Wanat battle: insurgents stormed an isolated stronghold manned by American forces stretched thin by the demands of war.


Army Col. Wayne Shanks, a military spokesman in Afghanistan, said a review of the battle at Kamdesh is under way. "It is too early to make any assumptions regarding what did or didn't work correctly," he said.
Complaints about the weapons the troops carry, especially the M4, aren't new. Army officials say that when properly cleaned and maintained, the M4 is a quality weapon that can pump out more than 3,000 rounds before any failures occur.


The M4 is a shorter, lighter version of the M16, which made its debut during the Vietnam war. Roughly 500,000 M4s are in service, making it the rifle troops on the front lines trust with their lives.
Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., a leading critic of the M4, said Thursday the Army needs to move quickly to acquire a combat rifle suited for the extreme conditions U.S. troops are fighting in.


U.S. special operations forces, with their own acquisition budget and the latitude to buy gear the other military branches can't, already are replacing their M4s with a new rifle.


"The M4 has served us well but it's not as good as it needs to be," Coburn said.


Battlefield surveys show that nearly 90 percent of soldiers are satisfied with their M4s, according to Brig. Gen. Peter Fuller, head of the Army office that buys soldier gear. Still, the rifle is continually being improved to make it even more reliable and lethal.


Fuller said he's received no official reports of flawed weapons performance at Wanat. "Until it showed up in the news, I was surprised to hear about all this," he said.


The study by Douglas Cubbison of the Army Combat Studies Institute at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., hasn't been publicly released. Copies of the study have been leaked to news organizations and are circulating on the Internet.


Cubbison's study is based on an earlier Army investigation and interviews with soldiers who survived the attack at Wanat. He describes a well-coordinated attack by a highly skilled enemy that unleashed a withering barrage with AK-47 automatic rifles and rocket-propelled grenades.


The soldiers said their weapons were meticulously cared for and routinely inspected by commanders. But still the weapons had breakdowns, especially when the rifles were on full automatic, which allows hundreds of bullets to be fired a minute.


The platoon-sized unit of U.S. soldiers and about two dozen Afghan troops was shooting back with such intensity the barrels on their weapons turned white hot. The high rate of fire appears to have put a number of weapons out of commission, even though the guns are tested and built to operate in extreme conditions.


Cpl. Jonathan Ayers and Spc. Chris McKaig were firing their M4s from a position the soldiers called the "Crow's Nest." The pair would pop up together from cover, fire half a dozen rounds and then drop back down.



On one of these trips up, Ayers was killed instantly by an enemy round. McKaig soon had problems with his M4, which carries a 30-round magazine.



"My weapon was overheating," McKaig said, according to Cubbison's report. "I had shot about 12 magazines by this point already and it had only been about a half hour or so into the fight. I couldn't charge my weapon and put another round in because it was too hot, so I got mad and threw my weapon down."



The soldiers also had trouble with their M249 machine guns, a larger weapon than the M4 that can shoot up to 750 rounds per minute.
Cpl. Jason Bogar fired approximately 600 rounds from his M-249 before the weapon overheated and jammed the weapon.



Bogar was killed during the firefight, but no one saw how he died, according to the report.
 

uncleyap

Alfrescian
Loyal
Peace Prize MY FOOT!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091010...sZV9zdW1tYXJ5X2xpc3QEc2xrA2F4ZWxyb2RhZmdoYQ--

Axelrod: Afghanistan plan deeper than troop surge


<cite class="vcard"> By MARGERY A. BECK, Associated Press Writer Margery A. Beck, Associated Press Writer </cite> – <abbr title="2009-10-09T21:46:32-0700" class="timedate">Sat Oct 10, 12:46 am ET</abbr>
<!-- end .byline --> LINCOLN, Neb. – A senior White House adviser said Friday that President Barack Obama's talks on Afghanistan with top national security advisers earlier in the day ran much deeper than the question of sending more troops into the war.
Presidential adviser David Axelrod, in a speech at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, said "a lot of different factors" are being considered in the internal discussions, including allegations of fraud in Afghanistan's recent presidential election and America's strained relationship with Pakistan.
"Fundamentally, what we need to think through is what is the best way to achieve our goals, which is to disrupt and dismantle al-Qaida, so they can't stage operations against the U.S. and our allies," Axelrod said.
Obama, who was awarded the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize early Friday, is considering a request from Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the war's top commander, for as many as 40,000 additional troops. There are 65,000 U.S. forces in Afghanistan now.
Axelrod also took a shot at former President George W. Bush while lauding Obama's caution on how to proceed with the war, saying, "We've tried it the other way, and it didn't work."
Axelrod said he could not say when a decision would be made on whether to send more troops to the war zone.
"This is a complex issue," he said. "As an American, I'm happy the president is diving in as deep as he is and gathering information so he can make the right decision."
Axelrod's speech was the second of the university's Peter J. Hoagland Integrity in Public Service Lecture series, named for former Rep. Peter Hoagland. Hoagland, a Democrat, represented the Omaha area from 1989 to 1995. He died in 2007 at age 65 after battling Parkinson's disease.
Among those attending Axelrod's lecture were U.S. Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., and state Sen. Tom White, a Democrat who has announced his candidacy for Nebraska's 2nd District congressional seat currently held by Republican Lee Terry.
Nelson, a conservative Democrat who has balked at supporting a so-called public option in the ongoing debate on health care reform, was the target of some ribbing during the address.
Asked if the final version of health care reform would include a public option, Axelrod said, "I feel like I've been monopolizing the stage, so I'd like to turn this question over to Senator Nelson."
The joke drew applause and cheering from the heavily Democratic crowd of more than 500.
Nelson later brushed off the jest.
"I think everybody understood the humor," he said.
 

uncleyap

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,26191501-5006301,00.html?from=public_rss

Obama Nobel prize 'embarrassing'


Article from:
<!-- END Story Header Block -->
<!-- // .article-tools --> AAP
October 11, 2009 04:30pm



<!-- // .content-row clearfloat --> <!-- Article body --> A LIBERAL MP says giving the Nobel Peace Prize to US President Barack Obama is ``slightly embarrassing'' and diminishes the value of the award.
Mr Obama won the prize in a surprise decision just nine months after becoming president.

Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Opposition leader Malcolm Turnbull warmly congratulated Mr Obama on the win, which recognised his work on nuclear disarmament and diplomatic engagement.

But critics say he has not achieved enough to join the ranks of Nelson Mandela, Mother Teresa and Burma's Aung San Suu Kyi.

South Australian Liberal senator Simon Birmingham said the decision was a mistake.

``I think it's slightly embarrassing for probably both him and for the status of the Nobel Peace Prize for the award to have gone to him,'' he said.

``To think that in less than a year he has made any notable difference to world peace is hard to fathom.''

Senator Birmingham said there may have been a degree of sentimentality in the decision, given that Mr Obama was the first black US president, and a symbolic figure who spoke of hope.

The award should have gone to Zimbabwean democracy advocate Morgan Tsvangirai or to Aung San Suu Kyi, both of whom had paid a heavy price lately in their pursuit of peace, Senator Birmingham says.

The Nobel committee has been forced to defend its decision, saying it recognised great deeds to come and aimed to strengthen Mr Obama's push for peace and disarmament.

There was no criticism from Mr Rudd's camp.

``President Obama has already shown great leadership in international affairs, including in the fields of nuclear disarmament, global economic governance, climate change and human rights,'' a spokesman for the prime minister said in a statement issued on Saturday.

``His engagement has changed the dynamics of a number of global and regional debates.''

Likewise, Mr Turnbull did not share Senator Birmingham's concerns.

``President Obama is to be warmly congratulated for his Nobel Peace Prize, which will heighten both the opportunities for, and the expectations of, his presidency,'' he said on Friday.

``More than ever, the world would look to the president for leadership.''

Australian Greens leader Bob Brown said he was surprised by the decision but Mr Obama deserved a ``very big accolade'' for his work on nuclear disarmament.

Senator Brown noted the prize could be given as encouragement to people before they had made their major humanitarian contribution, citing as an example East Timorese independence advocate Jose Ramos Horta.

Fellow Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young pointed to the fact that the US was still at war in Afghanistan.

``Obama has won the Nobel Peace Prize - yet our countries are still at war in Afghanistan,'' she wrote on the social networking site Twitter.

 
A

Alu862

Guest
As suspected, yap is a right wing wing nut just like Sarah Palin.
 
Top