Which Royal is a Ginger besides Harry?
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
New british monarch bar blacks from royal dinner
- Thread starter syed putra
- Start date
The corgi
So U basically agree Harry might not be Charlie's son
Who knows. If Diana wanted a son, it should be with the pakistani heart surgeon.
I thought she would root the rich Egyptian chap
You give too much credit. She is simply a golddigger who struck gold.
It like China boycott US politicians.....totally useless gesture.
Its entrapment,.
The UK ladies were not hard up. But meghan got her target and zoomed in.
not royal. Diana's bodyguard.
So he should be kicked out of the royal family
The Royal family is going to be irrelevant after QE2's passing. They will become the new Osbournes or kardashans .. entertaining low ses angmors on TV and tabloid press.
It’s time Meghan and Harry lose their titles
The couple is now snubbing the very institution from which they derive their power and celebrity – it’s bizarre and damaging to the monarchyALLISON PEARSON31 August 2022 • 9:00am
Everything is content to Meghan, the life of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex now being a wholly-owned subsidiary of Netflix CREDIT: Rosa Woods - Pool/Getty Images
The news that Her Majesty is even contemplating inviting her new Prime Minister to form a government, next week, at Balmoral instead of Buckingham Palace, tells you that our Queen is in frail health. A stranger to self-pity, the national super trouper would always be in the right place at the right time if she possibly could.
The significance should not be lost on anyone. What she needs at this time is the respect, affection and consideration which befits our longest-reigning monarch in the home straight of her life. This novel idea has clearly not penetrated the rosewater-fragranced designer-candled halls of that Palace of Positivity and Nurturing Goodness in Montecito where Duchess Meghan has given yet another interview that could have been calculated to unsettle the Royal family.
Very little in the way of thoughtfulness is to be expected from a couple who, in March 2021, gave an inflammatory interview to Oprah when Prince Philip was seriously ill in hospital. All that matters to Meghan and Harry is the expansion of their flourishing grievance business in which they amusingly portray themselves as the abused, star-crossed lovers in a tragedy also starring Miser Charles, Wicked Fairy Camilla, Unsupportive William and Bully Kate Who Made Me Cry.
Actually, the interview for New York magazine’s The Cut by Allison P. Davis is not always the helpful hagiography its subject may have counted on.
“Your eye contact is good,” says Meghan unsettlingly to Davis, “You’re, like, looking into my soul.”
The journalist is not convinced it’s a soul. More a carefully managed stage-set in which the Suits star puts on a performance of “effortless, arms-wide-open, relatable affectation”. She smells calculation.
“She has taken a hardship and turned it into content,” observes the interviewer. It’s phrased like a compliment, but it really isn’t. Everything is content to Meghan, the life of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex now being a wholly-owned subsidiary of Netflix.
Meghan’s The Cut interview in quotes
Prince Harry, meanwhile, is increasingly relegated to a sweet bit-part. Think Buttons in Cinderella. Sometimes, Meghan’s husband is glimpsed juggling through a window or he is allowed to say a few lines which burnish the legend of his incredibly modest yet somehow vain and self-obsessed wife.
A few things jump out. First, Meghan’s grievances grow ever bolder and more extravagant, floating free of any observable reality. She claims that, had the Sussexes stayed in the UK, she’d never be able to do school pickup and drop-off with Archie without a press pen of 40 people snapping pictures. Yet, Prince George and Princess Charlotte have been dropped off and picked up by their parents for several years without a single intrusive or unauthorised picture appearing in the papers.
Meghan also impugns the British media, asking why she would share photos with “the very people who are calling my children the n-word”. When did that happen? Oh. Never.
(Fibs are fine if it’s someone’s “truth”. The Duchess’s half-sister, Samantha, said it was dishonest of her to claim during the Oprah interview that she grew up as an only child. Meghan’s lawyers insisted that it was not meant to be “objective fact”, but a “statement of her feelings”.)
What I would find troubling about this interview if I were Prince Charles or Prince William are the hints of emotional manipulation. Meghan points out, more than once, that nothing constrains her from speaking out – whether on her new, top-rating podcast, Archetypes, or in the wider media – about what she considers her dreadful treatment at the hands of the Windsors. “But it takes a lot of effort to forgive. I’ve really made an active effort, especially knowing that I can say anything,” she says, her voice full of meaning.
Until now, the Palace has confined itself to the exquisitely lethal “recollections may vary” when responding to Meghan and Harry’s hurtful accusations. How much longer can that Keep ‘Em Sweet strategy go on? It isn’t working. For all her mushy yogic musings about forgiveness, the Duchess is a world-class grudge-bearer who has ostracised her own father and now it looks like poor Prince Charles is getting the same treatment.
I have been told by a reliable source that Harry is homesick in LA, but can’t own up to the mistakes he’s made for fear of upsetting his wife.
It looks like the Sussexes won’t see Harry’s father, William and his family or the Queen during their visit to the UK next week. In effect, we have a quasi-Royal tour with the couple now snubbing (or being snubbed by?) the very institution from which they derive their power and celebrity. It’s bizarre. And damaging to the monarchy.
Clearly, it’s time the Sussexes lost their royal titles whose privileges they enjoy without the accompanying responsibilities and restraints. But who in the Firm will have the courage to take on Meghan and her truth?
Related Topics
Another thing I want to add is Megan markle might or might not be a gold digger and attention whore. She is now a favorite target of the tabloids. And don't doubt for a second that the western tabloid press is as trashy as they come.
I clearly remember Princess Diana was the British tabloids target until her death in the Paris accident. Then overnight she became a saint. A charity fund and all-star memorial concert seemed to make the whole world forget how the tabloids had hounded and attacked her in her final days.
This is the power of the media
I clearly remember Princess Diana was the British tabloids target until her death in the Paris accident. Then overnight she became a saint. A charity fund and all-star memorial concert seemed to make the whole world forget how the tabloids had hounded and attacked her in her final days.
This is the power of the media
Maybe she was with muslims. Just to get back at her mother in law or charles.
That just means Princess Diana is no Saint ..at least Charlie only loved 1 woman his whole life...better than Diana who was having affairs like no tomorrow
Similar threads
