• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Garang Building Contractor Sued for Defamation

Hans168

Alfrescian
Loyal
Hahaha.............monkey sees, monkey do! Hytech Builders sued a condo buyer when she emailed a complaint about her leaky unit. Instead of fixing the problem this garang ass company tried to use big muscle and sued her for defamation from High Court to Court of Appeal hiring big gun lawyers from Rajah & Tann! CJ Chan dismissed it with costs calling it a tempest in a teacup!!!!!!!!!
What could have happened if the buyer did not have the funds to fight this rich n powerful commercial giant? She just crumpled n pay thru her nose like the 2 chap who got screwed by
TT Durai who denied flying first class using NKF funds!!!
Justice comes with a big price tag & that is unjust!!!:mad:














J
 

Hans168

Alfrescian
Loyal
I am perplexed why big law firm represented the company which clearly is in the wrong to sue on such filmsy excuse - till Court of Appeal! The big businesses are increasingly trigger-happy. Monkey see, monkey do: Defamation Pays......... & pay well????
 

Wobble

Alfrescian
Loyal
high court for charges above $25k...even if the contractor lose..the law firms earn....they win lor
 

Man in the streets

Alfrescian
Loyal
Wonder where is the developer in this case.

there is a one year liability be it common area or the unit itself. If the defects are filed within the same year, the developer is still responsible if the defects are not fixed after the liable period.
i think the buyer may have critisized the workmanship like hell till the main contractor (hytech) tak boleh tahan.

If the case is against the Monkey familee, justice would be the victim.


UOTE=Hans168;39076]Hahaha.............monkey sees, monkey do! Hytech Builders sued a condo buyer when she emailed a complaint about her leaky unit. Instead of fixing the problem this garang ass company tried to use big muscle and sued her for defamation from High Court to Court of Appeal hiring big gun lawyers from Rajah & Tann! CJ Chan dismissed it with costs calling it a tempest in a teacup!!!!!!!!!
What could have happened if the buyer did not have the funds to fight this rich n powerful commercial giant? She just crumpled n pay thru her nose like the 2 chap who got screwed by
TT Durai who denied flying first class using NKF funds!!!
Justice comes with a big price tag & that is unjust!!!:mad:














J[/QUOTE]
 

Hans168

Alfrescian
Loyal
.....join Rajah n Tann to get super rich super quick? How come we seldom heard of those super rich lawyers doing charity???? So unfair: they just take n take (sounds familiar?)
 

Hans168

Alfrescian
Loyal
it was a bona fide case of leaking condo.... so buyer has all the right to bitch about it until it is fixed ASAP. What can be wrong with her case???
 

Hans168

Alfrescian
Loyal
sg fuckedup system rewards those who are not really brilliant.... but in the right trade which charges too expensively for defence of one's rights or enforce them..... sad case for the poor n not so powerful
 

Hans168

Alfrescian
Loyal
something's terribly wrong with our system........ the rule of law is supreme & the pple directly to do with it, exploit it like hell & abuse it too... run away if things get bad! WTF!
 
Top