https://hk.news.yahoo.com/分判商工人剪短鋼筋-港鐵監管人員無量度-214500147.html
分判商工人剪短鋼筋 港鐵監管人員無量度
東方日報 OrientalDaily
3.6k 人追蹤
東方日報
2018年6月8日 上午5:45
查看相片
港鐵指在巡查期間發現鋼筋接駁不合規格的情況。
港鐵前日召開記者會，期間多次被問及誰人剪短鋼筋再假扮裝妥，工程總監黃唯銘當時回應沒有證據顯示何人所為，但事隔一晚，黃昨晨突然在電台節目中揭開謎底，指根據港鐵工程監管人員匯報，發現鋼筋被剪短時只有「泛迅」的工人在場，相信是該批工人剪短鋼筋。他又引述工人的解釋，因工程部分地方需要用的鋼筋較密集，安裝亦有先後次序，部分鋼筋擺放有困難，工人於是「用另一個方法」處理。
五度揭違規 僅一次有文件紀錄
黃唯銘解釋，工程監管人員全日巡查工地現場，次數以百次計，每次檢查約一百個螺絲帽，在其中五次巡查中發現不合規格的情況，當中只有第三次、即一五年十二月中的一次有文件紀錄。他指監管人員發現五支鋼筋被剪短，「覺得好嬲」，因此向總承建商「禮頓」發警告信，而「禮頓」其後亦有向「泛迅」發警告信。至於其餘四次，每次均發現少於五支鋼筋遭剪短，由於已即時要求工人糾正，更換另一支鋼筋，因此沒有記錄，亦無量度被剪短的幅度。港鐵行政總裁梁國權則指，根據巡查人員的記憶及文字記錄資料，可以推算涉及有問題鋼筋總數少於廿多支。
馬時亨：造假須承擔法律責任
至於剪短鋼筋是否刻意造假，黃唯銘指港鐵要求承建商施工嚴格合乎設計及圖則要求，如發現不合規格便要修正，業界慣常的做法是除非找到有利益或瞞騙才再處理。馬時亨補充，承建商有責任確保全數二萬六千粒螺絲帽無問題，若發現有人造假，大判及分判商均要承擔法律責任。
馬時亨又認為，若再遇到同一情況，工程人員應向港鐵董事局轄下的工務委員會匯報，「依家望番轉頭，梗係佢應該話畀我哋聽有呢個安全問題」。但他強調，董事局大部分成員並非工程人員，「如果樣樣好細嘅嘢都要匯報，會影響成間公司流程」，若有需要改善通報機制，港鐵會採取謙卑和開放態度。他指待下星期提交報告後，若政府認為要設立委員會跟進，港鐵會配合。
港鐵與「禮頓」仍有數份合約
至於港鐵是否仍對「禮頓」有信心，梁國權指由地鐵年代開始與「禮頓」合作多年，對方在香港有數十年歷史，亦有各種認證，雙方目前仍有數份合約，日後的情況會再作處理。「禮頓」多日來未有回應事件，記者昨到訪泛迅建築有限公司的辦事處，但該公司無人應門。
" data-reactid="31">沙中線紅磡站擴建月台鋼筋接駁工程懷疑造假事件疑點重重，港鐵連日解畫卻語焉不詳，昨日終於首度揭開「真兇」身份。港鐵工程總監黃唯銘透露，根據工程監管人員的匯報，是負責紮鐵工程的分判商「泛迅」的工人剪短鋼筋，相信對方是施工時「貪方便」而作出有關行為，但港鐵的人員並無量度鋼筋被剪短的幅度。港鐵主席馬時亨重申，若證明有人違法必定「送官究辦」，並指今次事關重大，呼籲工程總承建商「禮頓」現身交代事件。
港鐵前日召開記者會，期間多次被問及誰人剪短鋼筋再假扮裝妥，工程總監黃唯銘當時回應沒有證據顯示何人所為，但事隔一晚，黃昨晨突然在電台節目中揭開謎底，指根據港鐵工程監管人員匯報，發現鋼筋被剪短時只有「泛迅」的工人在場，相信是該批工人剪短鋼筋。他又引述工人的解釋，因工程部分地方需要用的鋼筋較密集，安裝亦有先後次序，部分鋼筋擺放有困難，工人於是「用另一個方法」處理。
五度揭違規 僅一次有文件紀錄
黃唯銘解釋，工程監管人員全日巡查工地現場，次數以百次計，每次檢查約一百個螺絲帽，在其中五次巡查中發現不合規格的情況，當中只有第三次、即一五年十二月中的一次有文件紀錄。他指監管人員發現五支鋼筋被剪短，「覺得好嬲」，因此向總承建商「禮頓」發警告信，而「禮頓」其後亦有向「泛迅」發警告信。至於其餘四次，每次均發現少於五支鋼筋遭剪短，由於已即時要求工人糾正，更換另一支鋼筋，因此沒有記錄，亦無量度被剪短的幅度。港鐵行政總裁梁國權則指，根據巡查人員的記憶及文字記錄資料，可以推算涉及有問題鋼筋總數少於廿多支。
馬時亨：造假須承擔法律責任
至於剪短鋼筋是否刻意造假，黃唯銘指港鐵要求承建商施工嚴格合乎設計及圖則要求，如發現不合規格便要修正，業界慣常的做法是除非找到有利益或瞞騙才再處理。馬時亨補充，承建商有責任確保全數二萬六千粒螺絲帽無問題，若發現有人造假，大判及分判商均要承擔法律責任。
馬時亨又認為，若再遇到同一情況，工程人員應向港鐵董事局轄下的工務委員會匯報，「依家望番轉頭，梗係佢應該話畀我哋聽有呢個安全問題」。但他強調，董事局大部分成員並非工程人員，「如果樣樣好細嘅嘢都要匯報，會影響成間公司流程」，若有需要改善通報機制，港鐵會採取謙卑和開放態度。他指待下星期提交報告後，若政府認為要設立委員會跟進，港鐵會配合。
港鐵與「禮頓」仍有數份合約
至於港鐵是否仍對「禮頓」有信心，梁國權指由地鐵年代開始與「禮頓」合作多年，對方在香港有數十年歷史，亦有各種認證，雙方目前仍有數份合約，日後的情況會再作處理。「禮頓」多日來未有回應事件，記者昨到訪泛迅建築有限公司的辦事處，但該公司無人應門。
查看相片
馬時亨（左二）呼籲「禮頓」現身交代事件。右一為黃唯銘。（袁志豪攝）
查看相片
沙中線紅磡站擴建工程爆出懷疑鋼筋造假事件。
查看相片
記者昨到訪「泛迅」的辦事處，但無人應門。（黃雄攝）
Subcontractors cut short steel bars MTR supervisors have no measure
[Oriental Daily OrientalDaily]
Oriental Daily OrientalDaily
3.6k person tracking
Oriental Daily
June 8, 2018 5:45am
MTR refers to the situation where the rebar connection was found to be out of specification during the inspection.
See photos
MTR refers to the situation where the rebar connection was found to be out of specification during the inspection.
During the expansion of the Shaping Line Hung Hom station, there was considerable doubt about the suspicion of counterfeiting during the construction of the steel plate connection project at the platform of the Strait. MTR's interpretation of the picture on the same day was unknown, but it finally opened its identity as "authentic murderer" for the first time yesterday. Ms. Huang Weiming, Director of MTR Engineering, disclosed that according to the report of the project supervisor, the worker of the subcontractor “Fanxun” who was responsible for the tie-iron project cut the steel bars. He believed that the other party was doing “conscientious” at the time of construction and made the relevant actions, but the MTR The staff did not measure the extent to which the bars were cut. MTR Chairman Ma Shiheng reiterated that if anyone proves that someone has violated the law, he must “send to the government” and he means that the matter is important. He called on the engineering contractor Leighton to appear in the incident.
The MTR held a press conference the day before and was repeatedly asked about who cut the steel bars and then pretended to be installed. The director of engineering, Huang Weiming, responded that there was no evidence to show who the person was doing. However, after a night of absence, Huang yesterday morning suddenly uncovered the radio program. The answer is that according to the MTR project supervisors' report, they found that only when the steel bars were cut short, were the workers involved in the process. It was believed that the workers cut short steel bars. He also quoted the workers' explanation that because of the more intensive use of steel bars in certain parts of the project, the installation also had a sequence, and some steel bars were difficult to place. Workers then dealt with them “by another method”.
The fifth violation was only documented once
Huang Weiming explained that the engineering supervisors inspected the site on a full-time basis on a number of occasions. The number of inspections was about 100. Each time about one hundred screw caps were inspected, five out of the five inspections found out of standard conditions. Only the third, that is, ten years and ten years. One documentary record was recorded in mid-February. He pointed out that the supervisory staff found that the five reinforcing bars were cut short and "thought it was awkward". Therefore, he issued a warning letter to the chief contractor "Leighton," and Leighton subsequently issued a warning letter to the "pan-Xun." For the remaining four times, it was found that each time fewer than five reinforcements were cut short. As workers were immediately required to make corrections and replace another reinforcement, there was no record and no measure was taken. According to Liang Guoquan, chief executive officer of the MTR Corporation, based on the memory and written records of the inspectors, it can be inferred that the total number of steel bars involved in the problem is less than a few.
Ma Shiheng: falsification must bear legal responsibility
As to whether or not the steel bars are deliberately falsified, Huang Weiming pointed out that the MTR Corporation requires the construction of the contractors to strictly meet the requirements of the design and plans. If any irregularities are found, it is necessary to amend them. The usual practice in the industry is to retreat unless there is interest or fraud. Ma Shiheng added that the contractor has the responsibility to ensure that all 26,000 screw caps are free from problems. If any artificial vacations are found, major contractors and subcontractors are liable.
Ma Shiheng also believes that if the same situation is encountered, the engineering staff should report to the Works Committee under the management of the MTR Corporation Board. “After looking at the family and turning around, the stern ditch should call me a safety issue.” However, he emphasized that most members of the board of directors are not engineers. “If everything is presented in detail, it will affect the process of the company.” If there is a need to improve the notification mechanism, the MTR will adopt a humility and open attitude. He pointed out that after the report is submitted next week, the MTR will cooperate if the Government considers it necessary to set up a committee to follow up.
There are still several contracts between MTR and Leighton
As to whether the MTRCL still has confidence in Leighton, Liang Guoquan pointed out that the MTR began to cooperate with Leighton for many years. The other party has been in Hong Kong for decades and has various certifications. There are still several contracts between the two sides. The situation will be dealt with again. Leighton had not responded to the incident for several days. The reporter visited the offices of Panxun Construction Co., Ltd. yesterday, but no one answered the door.
Ma Shiheng (second from left) appealed to Leighton to present his case. The first one is Huang Weiming. (photo by Yuan Zhihao)
See photos
Ma Shiheng (second from left) appealed to Leighton to present his case. The first one is Huang Weiming. (photo by Yuan Zhihao)
The expansion project of the Hung Hom Station on the Shazhong Line has led to the occurrence of suspicion of steel fraud.
See photos
The expansion project of the Hung Hom Station on the Shazhong Line has led to the occurrence of suspicion of steel fraud.
The reporter visited the office of the “Fasting News” yesterday, but no one answered the door. (Huang Xiong photo)
See photos
The reporter visited the office of the “Fasting News” yesterday, but no one answered the door. (Huang Xiong photo)
分判商工人剪短鋼筋 港鐵監管人員無量度
東方日報 OrientalDaily
3.6k 人追蹤
東方日報
2018年6月8日 上午5:45
查看相片
港鐵指在巡查期間發現鋼筋接駁不合規格的情況。
港鐵前日召開記者會，期間多次被問及誰人剪短鋼筋再假扮裝妥，工程總監黃唯銘當時回應沒有證據顯示何人所為，但事隔一晚，黃昨晨突然在電台節目中揭開謎底，指根據港鐵工程監管人員匯報，發現鋼筋被剪短時只有「泛迅」的工人在場，相信是該批工人剪短鋼筋。他又引述工人的解釋，因工程部分地方需要用的鋼筋較密集，安裝亦有先後次序，部分鋼筋擺放有困難，工人於是「用另一個方法」處理。
五度揭違規 僅一次有文件紀錄
黃唯銘解釋，工程監管人員全日巡查工地現場，次數以百次計，每次檢查約一百個螺絲帽，在其中五次巡查中發現不合規格的情況，當中只有第三次、即一五年十二月中的一次有文件紀錄。他指監管人員發現五支鋼筋被剪短，「覺得好嬲」，因此向總承建商「禮頓」發警告信，而「禮頓」其後亦有向「泛迅」發警告信。至於其餘四次，每次均發現少於五支鋼筋遭剪短，由於已即時要求工人糾正，更換另一支鋼筋，因此沒有記錄，亦無量度被剪短的幅度。港鐵行政總裁梁國權則指，根據巡查人員的記憶及文字記錄資料，可以推算涉及有問題鋼筋總數少於廿多支。
馬時亨：造假須承擔法律責任
至於剪短鋼筋是否刻意造假，黃唯銘指港鐵要求承建商施工嚴格合乎設計及圖則要求，如發現不合規格便要修正，業界慣常的做法是除非找到有利益或瞞騙才再處理。馬時亨補充，承建商有責任確保全數二萬六千粒螺絲帽無問題，若發現有人造假，大判及分判商均要承擔法律責任。
馬時亨又認為，若再遇到同一情況，工程人員應向港鐵董事局轄下的工務委員會匯報，「依家望番轉頭，梗係佢應該話畀我哋聽有呢個安全問題」。但他強調，董事局大部分成員並非工程人員，「如果樣樣好細嘅嘢都要匯報，會影響成間公司流程」，若有需要改善通報機制，港鐵會採取謙卑和開放態度。他指待下星期提交報告後，若政府認為要設立委員會跟進，港鐵會配合。
港鐵與「禮頓」仍有數份合約
至於港鐵是否仍對「禮頓」有信心，梁國權指由地鐵年代開始與「禮頓」合作多年，對方在香港有數十年歷史，亦有各種認證，雙方目前仍有數份合約，日後的情況會再作處理。「禮頓」多日來未有回應事件，記者昨到訪泛迅建築有限公司的辦事處，但該公司無人應門。
" data-reactid="31">沙中線紅磡站擴建月台鋼筋接駁工程懷疑造假事件疑點重重，港鐵連日解畫卻語焉不詳，昨日終於首度揭開「真兇」身份。港鐵工程總監黃唯銘透露，根據工程監管人員的匯報，是負責紮鐵工程的分判商「泛迅」的工人剪短鋼筋，相信對方是施工時「貪方便」而作出有關行為，但港鐵的人員並無量度鋼筋被剪短的幅度。港鐵主席馬時亨重申，若證明有人違法必定「送官究辦」，並指今次事關重大，呼籲工程總承建商「禮頓」現身交代事件。
港鐵前日召開記者會，期間多次被問及誰人剪短鋼筋再假扮裝妥，工程總監黃唯銘當時回應沒有證據顯示何人所為，但事隔一晚，黃昨晨突然在電台節目中揭開謎底，指根據港鐵工程監管人員匯報，發現鋼筋被剪短時只有「泛迅」的工人在場，相信是該批工人剪短鋼筋。他又引述工人的解釋，因工程部分地方需要用的鋼筋較密集，安裝亦有先後次序，部分鋼筋擺放有困難，工人於是「用另一個方法」處理。
五度揭違規 僅一次有文件紀錄
黃唯銘解釋，工程監管人員全日巡查工地現場，次數以百次計，每次檢查約一百個螺絲帽，在其中五次巡查中發現不合規格的情況，當中只有第三次、即一五年十二月中的一次有文件紀錄。他指監管人員發現五支鋼筋被剪短，「覺得好嬲」，因此向總承建商「禮頓」發警告信，而「禮頓」其後亦有向「泛迅」發警告信。至於其餘四次，每次均發現少於五支鋼筋遭剪短，由於已即時要求工人糾正，更換另一支鋼筋，因此沒有記錄，亦無量度被剪短的幅度。港鐵行政總裁梁國權則指，根據巡查人員的記憶及文字記錄資料，可以推算涉及有問題鋼筋總數少於廿多支。
馬時亨：造假須承擔法律責任
至於剪短鋼筋是否刻意造假，黃唯銘指港鐵要求承建商施工嚴格合乎設計及圖則要求，如發現不合規格便要修正，業界慣常的做法是除非找到有利益或瞞騙才再處理。馬時亨補充，承建商有責任確保全數二萬六千粒螺絲帽無問題，若發現有人造假，大判及分判商均要承擔法律責任。
馬時亨又認為，若再遇到同一情況，工程人員應向港鐵董事局轄下的工務委員會匯報，「依家望番轉頭，梗係佢應該話畀我哋聽有呢個安全問題」。但他強調，董事局大部分成員並非工程人員，「如果樣樣好細嘅嘢都要匯報，會影響成間公司流程」，若有需要改善通報機制，港鐵會採取謙卑和開放態度。他指待下星期提交報告後，若政府認為要設立委員會跟進，港鐵會配合。
港鐵與「禮頓」仍有數份合約
至於港鐵是否仍對「禮頓」有信心，梁國權指由地鐵年代開始與「禮頓」合作多年，對方在香港有數十年歷史，亦有各種認證，雙方目前仍有數份合約，日後的情況會再作處理。「禮頓」多日來未有回應事件，記者昨到訪泛迅建築有限公司的辦事處，但該公司無人應門。
查看相片
馬時亨（左二）呼籲「禮頓」現身交代事件。右一為黃唯銘。（袁志豪攝）
查看相片
沙中線紅磡站擴建工程爆出懷疑鋼筋造假事件。
查看相片
記者昨到訪「泛迅」的辦事處，但無人應門。（黃雄攝）
Subcontractors cut short steel bars MTR supervisors have no measure
[Oriental Daily OrientalDaily]
Oriental Daily OrientalDaily
3.6k person tracking
Oriental Daily
June 8, 2018 5:45am
MTR refers to the situation where the rebar connection was found to be out of specification during the inspection.
See photos
MTR refers to the situation where the rebar connection was found to be out of specification during the inspection.
During the expansion of the Shaping Line Hung Hom station, there was considerable doubt about the suspicion of counterfeiting during the construction of the steel plate connection project at the platform of the Strait. MTR's interpretation of the picture on the same day was unknown, but it finally opened its identity as "authentic murderer" for the first time yesterday. Ms. Huang Weiming, Director of MTR Engineering, disclosed that according to the report of the project supervisor, the worker of the subcontractor “Fanxun” who was responsible for the tie-iron project cut the steel bars. He believed that the other party was doing “conscientious” at the time of construction and made the relevant actions, but the MTR The staff did not measure the extent to which the bars were cut. MTR Chairman Ma Shiheng reiterated that if anyone proves that someone has violated the law, he must “send to the government” and he means that the matter is important. He called on the engineering contractor Leighton to appear in the incident.
The MTR held a press conference the day before and was repeatedly asked about who cut the steel bars and then pretended to be installed. The director of engineering, Huang Weiming, responded that there was no evidence to show who the person was doing. However, after a night of absence, Huang yesterday morning suddenly uncovered the radio program. The answer is that according to the MTR project supervisors' report, they found that only when the steel bars were cut short, were the workers involved in the process. It was believed that the workers cut short steel bars. He also quoted the workers' explanation that because of the more intensive use of steel bars in certain parts of the project, the installation also had a sequence, and some steel bars were difficult to place. Workers then dealt with them “by another method”.
The fifth violation was only documented once
Huang Weiming explained that the engineering supervisors inspected the site on a full-time basis on a number of occasions. The number of inspections was about 100. Each time about one hundred screw caps were inspected, five out of the five inspections found out of standard conditions. Only the third, that is, ten years and ten years. One documentary record was recorded in mid-February. He pointed out that the supervisory staff found that the five reinforcing bars were cut short and "thought it was awkward". Therefore, he issued a warning letter to the chief contractor "Leighton," and Leighton subsequently issued a warning letter to the "pan-Xun." For the remaining four times, it was found that each time fewer than five reinforcements were cut short. As workers were immediately required to make corrections and replace another reinforcement, there was no record and no measure was taken. According to Liang Guoquan, chief executive officer of the MTR Corporation, based on the memory and written records of the inspectors, it can be inferred that the total number of steel bars involved in the problem is less than a few.
Ma Shiheng: falsification must bear legal responsibility
As to whether or not the steel bars are deliberately falsified, Huang Weiming pointed out that the MTR Corporation requires the construction of the contractors to strictly meet the requirements of the design and plans. If any irregularities are found, it is necessary to amend them. The usual practice in the industry is to retreat unless there is interest or fraud. Ma Shiheng added that the contractor has the responsibility to ensure that all 26,000 screw caps are free from problems. If any artificial vacations are found, major contractors and subcontractors are liable.
Ma Shiheng also believes that if the same situation is encountered, the engineering staff should report to the Works Committee under the management of the MTR Corporation Board. “After looking at the family and turning around, the stern ditch should call me a safety issue.” However, he emphasized that most members of the board of directors are not engineers. “If everything is presented in detail, it will affect the process of the company.” If there is a need to improve the notification mechanism, the MTR will adopt a humility and open attitude. He pointed out that after the report is submitted next week, the MTR will cooperate if the Government considers it necessary to set up a committee to follow up.
There are still several contracts between MTR and Leighton
As to whether the MTRCL still has confidence in Leighton, Liang Guoquan pointed out that the MTR began to cooperate with Leighton for many years. The other party has been in Hong Kong for decades and has various certifications. There are still several contracts between the two sides. The situation will be dealt with again. Leighton had not responded to the incident for several days. The reporter visited the offices of Panxun Construction Co., Ltd. yesterday, but no one answered the door.
Ma Shiheng (second from left) appealed to Leighton to present his case. The first one is Huang Weiming. (photo by Yuan Zhihao)
See photos
Ma Shiheng (second from left) appealed to Leighton to present his case. The first one is Huang Weiming. (photo by Yuan Zhihao)
The expansion project of the Hung Hom Station on the Shazhong Line has led to the occurrence of suspicion of steel fraud.
See photos
The expansion project of the Hung Hom Station on the Shazhong Line has led to the occurrence of suspicion of steel fraud.
The reporter visited the office of the “Fasting News” yesterday, but no one answered the door. (Huang Xiong photo)
See photos
The reporter visited the office of the “Fasting News” yesterday, but no one answered the door. (Huang Xiong photo)
