• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Married martial arts instructor allegedly had sexual relationship with student, 13

MarrickG

Alfrescian
Loyal
married_martial_arts_instructor_allegedly_had-thumbnail.jpg


HE WAS more than three times her age and married with two children.

Yet the martial arts instructor, 42, allegedly had a sexual relationship with his student, then 13.

He even took the girl to a temple where they “solemnised” their “marriage”.

They also addressed each other as “lao gong” and “lao po” (Chinese for husband and wife), according to the prosecution’s opening statement yesterday.

The man is on trial over three charges of statutory rape and four charges of sexual exploitation.

He cannot be named as there is a court order to protect the identity of the girl, who is now in Secondary Five.

The court was told that he got to know the girl when she joined the school’s martial arts club in 2007. She was in Secondary One, and he was the club’s instructor.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Chua Ying-Hong told the court that the girl and some of her fellow trainees visited the man’s flat on Feb 20, 2007, the third day of Chinese New Year.

After a few hours there, the students left for a nearby shopping centre.

While there, the girl realised that her appointment had been cancelled and she SMSed the man to tell him.

He offered to keep her company and went to pick her up in a car. They went for a drive and later stopped to smoke and chat before returning to his flat for dinner.

Later that night, after the girl had returned home, he sent her an SMS. He asked her to be his girlfriend and she agreed.

About a week later, the man drove the girl to Sembawang Beach, where they hugged and kissed.

After dinner, he drove her to a multi-storey carpark at Towner Road, and he slipped his hand under her T-shirt to caress her breasts.

One night in March 2007, he drove her to Turnhouse Road, near Changi, and they had sex in his car.

The court heard that the pair had sex in the car on two other occasions the following month.

On May 4, 2007, four months after the girl got to know the man, he took her to a temple in Yishun where they prayed and “solemnised” their “marriage” to each other.

By then, their relationship had come to the attention of the school’s principal after she received a call on April 10, 2007, from someone claiming to be a relative of one of the man’s students.

The principal, who took the stand yesterday, said the caller told her specifically that the girl and the instructor were having an “unhealthy relationship” which was “more than that of a master and disciple”.

This prompted the principal to direct the teacher-in-charge of the club and the school’s discipline mistress to carry out an investigation.

But it came to naught as the students they spoke to did not reveal anything unusual.

Meanwhile, rumours were spreading in the school about the couple’s relationship.

The teacher-in-charge of the club testified that the man had called her to address “the rumours”, saying that there was nothing going on between him and the girl.

Around that time, the man’s wife also called her to ask if there was something going on between the duo.

The teacher-in-charge told the court: “She said, ‘I’m begging you, please tell me because this has happened before.’

“I told her the truth that at that time, there was no evidence to suggest anything.”

Admitted

In May, a student in the club told the teacher-in-charge that the instructor had admitted he was “going steady” with the girl.

Another trainee also revealed to the teacher-in-charge that the man once told her to lie to his wife that there was a training session on a particular day.

Around that time, the same caller who had tipped off the principal called her again to say the man and the girl were having a relationship.
This prompted another round of investigations.

The discipline mistress testified that when she confronted the girl on May 10, 2007, she was “quite evasive”.

She could sense that the girl was lying and asked for the girl’s mobile phone. Among her text messages, she found many “intimate messages” sent from a “lao gong”.

When she checked, she found that the mobile phone number belonged to the instructor.

The discipline mistress also came across a photograph of the couple, and a long romantic poem.

And on her blog, the girl revealed that she liked the instructor.

From her investigations, the discipline mistress found out that some of the trainees had gone to the man’s flat for dinner on several occasions.
She said: “(The man) would drive the students home after dinner.

“The second last person to be dropped off would usually be (a male trainee) and the last person would normally be the girl.”

That same day, the man was called to the principal’s office and told that his services would be terminated.

He accepted the termination after asking if it had anything to do with the girl. He was also told to stop contact with the girl and all other students.

The girl was sent for counselling the next day.

During this counselling session, she revealed to the counsellor that she had a sexual relationship with the man, the court was told.

The girl also said that she was not in an exclusive relationship with him.

The counsellor testified that the girl told her she had done “couple things” with the man, including holding hands, kissing and sex.
“She mentioned that they always had sex in his car,” the counsellor told the court.

The girl revealed that the man’s wife had found out about their relationship and had confronted her.

The girl’s mother was informed and a police report was made. The man was arrested on May 16.

The counsellor said the girl had asked her to accompany her to the police station to make the report, and again when her statement was taken.

“She was very uncomfortable...There were many things they (the police) asked her, and she did not understand many of the terms,” the counsellor said.

Yesterday, the prosecution also played a video that showed one of the lessons the man had with his students. It had been recorded by a student.

One of the clips was titled “Grappling/Anti-rape defence tactics”.

In the defence’s opening statement, Mr Martin Decruz said that this was not a case of a young person being ravaged against her will and that the girl had suffered no trauma.

He said that he would show evidence to prove that the man had alibis on Feb 28, 2007, one of the days he was alleged to have committed indecent acts with the girl twice.

The man, who is out on bail, was accompanied by his mother and three friends in court. The trial continues today.

If convicted of statutory rape, he can be jailed 20 years and caned.

If convicted of sexual exploitation, he can be jailed two years and fined $5,000.
 

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Married martial arts instructor allegedly had sexual relationship with student, 1

This kind of publication should be banned .
Because this what most middle aged
Singaporean men wet dream is made of .

And in fact, most in the midst of it .
 

wahlaneh

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Married martial arts instructor allegedly had sexual relationship with student, 1

This kind of publication should be banned .
Because this what most middle aged
Singaporean men wet dream is made of .

And in fact, most in the midst of it .

wahlaneh...
if ban means more such cases go unreported liao.
 

myfoot123

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Married martial arts instructor allegedly had sexual relationship with student, 1

I suspect the 13yo girl had been surfing porn on the net and get emotionally "developed" too fast. 13yo...should be Pr 6 or Sec 1. I wonder how the parents managed her when she returned home late after every "lesson".
 

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Married martial arts instructor allegedly had sexual relationship with student, 1

I suspect the 13yo girl had been surfing porn on the net and get emotionally "developed" too fast. 13yo...should be Pr 6 or Sec 1. I wonder how the parents managed her when she returned home late after every "lesson".

Her parents will notice that the size of her boobs
are growing exponentially with all that squeezing .




Why is Singapore public making such a big hoola ?

You want all girls and women to wear a
BlackBOX with GPS, WIFI ,EDGE, ?

 

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Married martial arts instructor allegedly had sexual relationship with student, 1

I think all under-age girls should be tagged like a AVA wildlife .
 
Top