• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Cities sell themselves to the world, on whose sufferance?

S

SylviaLim

Guest
Cities sell themselves to the world, on whose sufferance?

A chance to host a internationally acclaimed event can reverse the attitudes of officials overnight.

While authorities had been in no hurry to curb pollution in the past despite feisty criticisms and concerns for their fellow countrymen's health, it is almost laughable to watch government officials' recent attempts, scrambling to curb pollutions surrounding the city.

Given in the recent hype surrounding Beijing's hosting of the Olympic games, it is easy to turn a blind eye to the flip side of the story.

While Beijing sells itself to the world, and elicits praises from the international community for a series of measures to iron out the Olympic preparations, one can be forgiven for failing to flip the side of the coin and ask: At whose expense?

Factories are forced to a closure, jobs of factory workers have been temporarily cut off- Will the government eventually compensates for the workers' loss of earnings?

New traffic rules are implemented, with millions of common people on the streets inconvenienced and left to their own devices- Did the officials listened to the concerns of the people and investigated the impact upon them before taking such drastic measures?

I'm not suggesting that world-acclaimed events shouldn't be showered with all the attention they deserve. But it is pathetic that in a attempt to do so, the basic rights of the countrymen have taken the backseat or even disregarded.

Now, recalling what is close to home, it has always been fascinating to hear Singapore's elder statesman Mr LKY, wax lyrical about Singapore's coming of golden period ad nauseum.

But what does this mean, for a 70yr old lady working her butt off, clearing the tables in coffee shops for hours and hours while Singapore boast its international profile, and the government perpetuates to dwell on its successes?

Is she, a unskilled worker going to have her income raised? When is it ever going to be her turn to get a respite from the relentless cost of living?

Are the elderly, unskilled and less abled poor going to receive more then $280 per month for what they laboured through in the past, to bring the country to where it stands today?

Has the country, in its obsession to accomplish the bigger scheme of things and move ahead, left them in the wake?

Why must the old and less abled continue to slog it out while the nation progresses into its golden period?

When will the country's progress ever translate to benefits for the less fortunate?

When our government spew the words; "growth at all cost", what does "cost" really mean?

The country is moving ahead, but many in the lowest rungs of the societal ladder aren't following suit.

Sometimes the government forgets the primary purpose for which the people put them in the governing seat for; that is, to take care of the welfare of its countrymen right down to the last man on the streets.

Are the little people negligible as our efficient government strives to reach new heights on the global front?

In countries where democracy does not thrive, the rights and worth of the man on the streets cheapen.

Voices of the people are often overlooked as ruling elites do not keep their nose to the ground.
 

gravure

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is what is called the price of progress. It will have to be done for the GREATER GOOD.

No matter what you do, there will always be some people who will be inconvinienced and maybe suffer.

China hosting the olympics may be good for the China Psyche, but there will be many who will suffer. But will say 1 million suffering and 499 million benefiting and 500 million bo chap be considered a win scenario? That is what I think the leaders in China believe.

In Singapore, just to host the announcement ceremony for the olympics, we also cost damn lot of money, inconviniece damn lot of people, and only the hotel and food outlets gained. And so we did it to stroke LKY's ego and put Singapore on the map. Incidently, no one in Europe and USA speaks Malay, and when the announcements were made in English, French, Chinese and Malay, it probably benefitted Malaysia and Indonesia more than it benefitted Singapore.
 

boywonder86

Alfrescian
Loyal
Well if it's China you're talking about, all the days and hours of economic "downtime" could be easily "kicked" back into full throttle. They just need to whip their workers, hold their loved ones hostage, jail their siblings and parents... and the "slaves who turn the wheels of China's massive economy will get back on to 5th gear.

Torture them man. Torture them.

It's China you're talking about. Tanks have rolled over them. What's a little whipping and abduction.

How does that sound? Familiar?
 

madmansg

Alfrescian
Loyal
silvia lim is a hypocrite who pretend to fight for the common man but stab them in the back with 2.5 years of NS.
 

silverfox@

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is what is called the price of progress. It will have to be done for the GREATER GOOD.

I kinda like this statement of yours. No policies or decisions will be welcomed by every single person. But if done for the GREATER GOOD, then it is a good decision. :biggrin:
 
R

RedCard

Guest
I kinda like this statement of yours. No policies or decisions will be welcomed by every single person. But if done for the GREATER GOOD, then it is a good decision. :biggrin:

One HongBao for you. For quoting out of context.:confused:
 

gravure

Alfrescian
Loyal
Unfortunately, It really has to be the greater good for humainy as many use the concept of greater good to persecute others. Hitler comes to mind.
 
Top