• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Singapore's labour productivity continues to decline !

kojakbt

Alfrescian
Loyal
[COLOR=_______]ST Editorial
Keep an eye on productivity decline
[/COLOR]
[COLOR=_______][/COLOR]
[COLOR=_______]LABOUR productivity - that is, output per worker - has dropped sharply in the downturn.[/COLOR] It has captured less attention in discussions than, say, government absentee payroll and training subsidies to help companies retain employees. NTUC deputy secretary-general Heng Chee How did well to remind Parliament last week that the issue of worker output was as critical in the long term as stemming job loss in the short term. [COLOR=_______]The continuous decline in productivity started in late 2007, a year before the recession began. It showed up in all sectors, except in construction. The 15.4 per cent drop in the first quarter of this year came after a 7.8 per cent decrease last year.[/COLOR]


The sharp decline partly reflects the timeliness and effectiveness of tripartite attempts to keep the unemployment rate - 3.2 per cent overall and 4.8 per cent of the local workforce in the first quarter - from rising further than is tolerable. Output per worker will likely continue to decline as 94,000 employees from 1,400 companies that have so far committed to the Skills Programme for Upgrading and Resilience (Spur) turn up at training venues instead of at their workplaces. It is obviously in the country's social and economic interest in a recession to keep joblessness from spiralling even if that extracts a productivity cost.

Productivity loss and unemployment, however, have more than just a transient statistical relationship. Workers, employers and the Government need to deal with falling productivity as a structural issue that pre-dated and will likely outlast the downturn. [COLOR=_______]Companies will do well to ponder Mr Heng's point about emphasising productivity in manufacturing and adding value to services over trying to get the lowest quote in labour cost.[/COLOR] Far from easy, such an approach will have to contend with competition that will likely be fiercer than any that globalisation has brought in recent years. Protectionism will likely re-emerge as a challenge, as industrialised economies struggle to recover. The temptation to race one another to the bottom might continue to prove hard to resist.
Vendors nevertheless have to compete on quality as well as price. Spur affords workers a much-needed opportunity to raise their productivity through upgrading or retraining. It is not and should never become a 'pretend' or 'make work' scheme. Beyond helping to stanch the jobs bleed, the programme must ensure training quality and relevance, despite the rapid expansion of courses and enrolments. Reversing productivity loss remains the preferable if not the only way to prepare for the upturn.
 

kojakbt

Alfrescian
Loyal
"The continuous decline in productivity started in late 2007, a year before the recession began."

Bros, just compare this with the huge increase of FTs coming to SG in 2007 below:


2ecql4j.jpg
 

annexa

Alfrescian
Loyal
How they calculate productivity?

Total revenue - total costs? Like is if rental increase but productivity increase but lose to REIT control rental, how?
 

hiddentalent

Alfrescian
Loyal
The govt needs to stop bringing in low wage labour, enforce minimum wage, increase investment in technology / automation.

What is the use of going through SPURS for upgrading when in the end you still use back the same old shit tools because fools in management didn't want to spend money on equipment.
 
Top