Serious Vow of Abstinence = Sexual Deprivation = Sexual Depravation = Sexual Assault Children

Regarding thee recent news reports and revelations of assaults on children committed by members of a certain religious institution in a certain country (not limited to this country, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sexual_abuse_cases).

Isn't it obvious to them? Or perhaps they refuse to see the truth, either because of actual naivety, or stubborn self-delusion, or both. Either way, harmful, to themselves and to the innocent victims.

Artificially enforced abstinence goes against human nature, and thus God's nature, and is biologically and psychologically (and in fact, most definitely spiritually as well) unnatural and thus damaging and thus actually becomes a perversion of nature.

It is well-documented, plus quite frankly, it's obvious common sense, that with (artificially enforced) deprivation of any important natural biological and psychological function (of any sort, not limited to sexual) inevitably comes the (backlash of) depravation, and consequently and accordingly, the assaults on the poor children (who are the easiest target for these deprived-thus-depraved perpetrators, tragically).

Cause and effect. When you artificially enforce an (biological, psychological, spiritual) unhealthy imbalance (eg. of abstinence), how can you claim to not expect the natural consequent backlash to occur, as everything desperately seeks to be in healthy balance according to God's laws of nature? Naivety or self-delusion?

Whatever the case, open your/their eyes and see the obvious truth. When you/they do not, future generations of innocent children will continue to suffer tragically for it.

https://www.rt.com/news/376447-australia-catholic-child-abuse/

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news...six-decades-of-child-abuse-alleg/3497246.html

Re: Vow of Abstinence = Sexual Deprivation = Sexual Depravation = Sexual Assault Chil

We are running into a danger of a nee kor to start killing children

Re: Vow of Abstinence = Sexual Deprivation = Sexual Depravation = Sexual Assault Chil

You can't blame these clergymen. The female congregation put them to trials and temptations every week with super short denim shorts, half ball and some braless. If these are not enough to make them fall, surely a slim waist girl with visible panty line will surely do the job.

Re: Vow of Abstinence = Sexual Deprivation = Sexual Depravation = Sexual Assault Chil

i am not saying it did not happen but most cases are young adults revealing things that happened in their childhood it seems.

without concrete evidence it becomes like how a man is guilty of molest very easily, just with words.

buddhist monks have to abstain too but there are few problems. is it the perception that buddhism is a "poor" religion?

Re: Vow of Abstinence = Sexual Deprivation = Sexual Depravation = Sexual Assault Chil

as a nominal rc of 50 years, i (nor my close friends like me) have never had the privilege of meeting such clergy. there was a case of a novice priest in sg who was accused by a teenage girl of molest. he drowned himself. if he was guilty, i think he did the right thing though suicide is a great sin.

it seems that when pastors can get married, this happens too:

https://www.google.com.sg/?gws_rd=ssl#q=child+sex+abuse+in+protestant+churches

maybe the catholic church is too high profile for its own good.

Re: Vow of Abstinence = Sexual Deprivation = Sexual Depravation = Sexual Assault Chil

Read the visitor comments on Facebook. Even some Malay Muslims say they also kena bad service from this organization. So it may not necessarily be a racist thing. Though it may (and usually is), a combination of more than just 1 factor alone.

https://www.allsingaporestuff.com/a...welcoming-twds-woman-looking-books-grandchild


On a related note, on another related article, she wrote :



"In Islam, there is no such thing as you must convert to Islam if you marry someone who is Islam. This rule is set by SEA countries to maintain the faith and prevent dilution of faith (i may be wrong but that was what I was taught)."

See, this here, is what I was talking about : with so many 'religious traditions & rules' set by human communities or institutions for their own reasons, agendas and purposes, the line is inexorably blurred between what 'God says is right and necessary' and what 'humans say is right and necessary', all being lumped together under 'religion'. Religious scholars (of any and all religions) routinely and will always disagree with each other on too many aspects. So if the human community (eg. in a particular country) insists on a certain 'tradition' for instance, under threat of punishment or worse, can you still deny that it then becomes part of the 'religion' (at least for pple in that particular country)?

If you've understood this post, you'll know that it isn't directed at any 1 religion in particular, but rather towards religion in general : merely pointing out the truth about the human condition which few people realize, understand and acknowledge, or are willing to realize, understand and acknowledge.

Re: Vow of Abstinence = Sexual Deprivation = Sexual Depravation = Sexual Assault Chil

all religions are human constructs, and open to interpretation. depending on who is more more persuasive, certain interpretations come to dominate.

sometimes it is best to be "nominal" - accept only the good parts and ignore the bad parts - do not be too rigid/staunch about anything.

sometimes, even in this modern age, some interpreters of religions still hold on to their traditional foes, and give a lot of attention to them eg protestantism, even though the original disagreements have been more or less settled, or rendered irrelevant. their job is made easier by the fact the their "foe" is always in the spotlight while they themselves can disband and fade away into the night should the spotlight be turned on them instead.

they ignore the proverbial elephant in the room - that those inconsistencies they oppose go on everywhere, even within themselves - yet they choose to closely scrutinise only their "foe".

Re: Vow of Abstinence = Sexual Deprivation = Sexual Depravation = Sexual Assault Chil

retrenched said:

all religions are human constructs, and open to interpretation. depending on who is more more persuasive, certain interpretations come to dominate.

sometimes it is best to be "nominal" - accept only the good parts and ignore the bad parts - do not be too rigid/staunch about anything.

sometimes, even in this modern age, some interpreters of religions still hold on to their traditional foes, and give a lot of attention to them eg protestantism, even though the original disagreements have been more or less settled, or rendered irrelevant. their job is made easier by the fact the their "foe" is always in the spotlight while they themselves can disband and fade away into the night should the spotlight be turned on them instead.

they ignore the proverbial elephant in the room - that those inconsistencies they oppose go on everywhere, even within themselves - yet they choose to closely scrutinise only their "foe".

Click to expand...

That is why religions need to do a review ever 50 years and decide what should remain or modified or chuck out etc. Use Christians for example..By right Christians cannot eat pork..But the major religions do as they have reinterpretate the so called rules. But also something's which are good for human kind is condemned like abortion for both many Christian denominations and Islam. That is why pinoyland for decades have been stuck in the dark ages..The bishops there are conservative and is holding back progress..Cannot divorce and no abortion..So pinays just walk out of the relationship and if need to abort go backyard doctor and of course they breed like rabbits.

Re: Vow of Abstinence = Sexual Deprivation = Sexual Depravation = Sexual Assault Chil

The_Hypocrite said:

That is why religions need to do a review ever 50 years and decide what should remain or modified or chuck out etc. Use Christians for example..By right Christians cannot eat pork..But the major religions do as they have reinterpretate the so called rules. But also something's which are good for human kind is condemned like abortion for both many Christian denominations and Islam. That is why pinoyland for decades have been stuck in the dark ages..The bishops there are conservative and is holding back progress..Cannot divorce and no abortion..So pinays just walk out of the relationship and if need to abort go backyard doctor and of course they breed like rabbits.

Click to expand...

+1..........