all of Nigger Obama's Fuck USA Deep Records Shattered by Ang Moh Trump
At 10X speed and magnitude, Ang Moh Trump already Fucked up USA beyond imagination, where Nigger Obama had set historical records of fucking up USA deeply, all records and been shattered by Ang Moh Trump magnificently and spectacularly.
Make America Great Again!
Kiss my ass again, and I can tell for 1000% sure, it is already MADE AMERICA DEAD for good.
http://www.salon.com/2016/12/21/don...lown-destroy-whats-left-of-americas-prestige/
Donald Trump and the death of “presidential”: Will this clown destroy what’s left of America’s prestige?
BOB CESCA SKIP TO COMMENTS
Donald Trump and the death of "presidential": Will this clown destroy what's left of America's prestige?
(Credit: Getty/Ian MacNicol)
Donald Trump clearly doesn’t care whether he’s seen as “presidential.” Almost the only time he has ever mentioned the word was when he repeatedly accused Hillary Clinton of lacking “the presidential look.”
Based on Trump’s remarks about Clinton, including the time he blurted it during the third debate, it’s difficult to know whether he understands what being presidential means, as if it were exclusively about how someone looks rather than behaves. (It’s a lot of both.) But this much has been obvious: Ever the misogynist, Trump didn’t think a 69-year-old woman looked presidential. The tragic irony is that Trump is absolutely the least presidential president-elect among all 44 men who have ascended to the Oval Office post, in terms of appearance, temperament and presentational style.
Since the advent of the republic, political scientists and junkies alike have discussed what being “presidential” means in the context of the American system and this has certainly evolved over the years. As is the case with so many other aspects of our constitutional democracy, presidential-ness has been handed down as one of the traditions that binds our entire system together. Throughout our history and especially in modern times, this characteristic projects a sense of stability in the White House — a sense of unwavering decency and decorum in a nation with the capacity to destroy civilization a thousand times over.
There’s a dignified, statesmanlike quality that’s required of the U.S. presidency, a humble and benevolent posture that’s ideally commensurate with great power, offering both foreign allies and American voters alike a palpable sense of confident stability. Trump somehow managed to evade having all of the above and, with the help of Vladimir Putin and millions of gullible voters, won anyway.
Presidential historian Douglas Brinkley described being presidential this way:
I think the most important aspect of being presidential is to not scare the world or the American people that you’re going to do something irrational — going into war in a willy-nilly fashion, using sloppy language that disturbs allies, being too jingoistic in presentation to the point that the rest of the world’s economic markets start wondering what’s going on in the United States. So it’s really about gravitas, of showing that you’re ready for the big game and that you understand that you have to act in a professional and in a sane manner.
What we’ve seen from Trump so far, be it during his campaign or the current transition, is a man who absolutely fails to live up to the basic standards of being presidential and indeed appears to be the exact opposite of presidential. Yet his people love him for it.
The entire standard has been rendered irrelevant — dead. Sixty-two million voters decided that being presidential doesn’t matter anymore and tragically every last Trump voter is about to discover why rejecting the presidential qualification was a blunder of historic proportions. The repercussions of this will be far-reaching and in so many ways irreparable.
Due to a general lack of education combined with the distracting misinformation of social media, few voters understand that with the country’s status as superpower there’s a set of written and unwritten rules meant to prevent the chief executive from drifting into “autocratic despot” territory and thus sparking sheer panic abroad among nations that rely on our support and reliability. Trump doesn’t care about these rules, and the destabilization that is likely to result will be horrendous.
Based on Brinkley’s standards, Trump doesn’t care about scaring the world with his cartoonish irrationality. If he did, he’d delete his Twitter account and stop doing victory rallies. Whether he’s attacking Vanity Fair for giving the Trump Grill a bad review, toying with Taiwan and China in less than 140 characters, stirring up his throng of disciples by screeching vague and overt threats against his enemies or wake at the crack of dawn attacking Alec Baldwin, Trump’s public behavior seems more like a morning-zoo shock jock than a leader who’s about to take control of the world’s largest stockpile of nuclear weapons.
Amazingly, Trump’s rallies are less presidential than his tweets, if that’s even possible. Never in the history of the modern presidency has a president-elect gone around to friendly crowds and recounted the election-night television coverage, while ham-fistedly mocking various news anchors. Never in the history of the modern presidency has a president-elect ranted incoherently about how he won “in a landslide” even though he lost the popular vote by a wide margin and received fewer electoral votes than roughly 46 out of 58 previous winners.
At 10X speed and magnitude, Ang Moh Trump already Fucked up USA beyond imagination, where Nigger Obama had set historical records of fucking up USA deeply, all records and been shattered by Ang Moh Trump magnificently and spectacularly.
Make America Great Again!
Kiss my ass again, and I can tell for 1000% sure, it is already MADE AMERICA DEAD for good.
http://www.salon.com/2016/12/21/don...lown-destroy-whats-left-of-americas-prestige/
Donald Trump and the death of “presidential”: Will this clown destroy what’s left of America’s prestige?
BOB CESCA SKIP TO COMMENTS
Donald Trump and the death of "presidential": Will this clown destroy what's left of America's prestige?
(Credit: Getty/Ian MacNicol)
Donald Trump clearly doesn’t care whether he’s seen as “presidential.” Almost the only time he has ever mentioned the word was when he repeatedly accused Hillary Clinton of lacking “the presidential look.”
Based on Trump’s remarks about Clinton, including the time he blurted it during the third debate, it’s difficult to know whether he understands what being presidential means, as if it were exclusively about how someone looks rather than behaves. (It’s a lot of both.) But this much has been obvious: Ever the misogynist, Trump didn’t think a 69-year-old woman looked presidential. The tragic irony is that Trump is absolutely the least presidential president-elect among all 44 men who have ascended to the Oval Office post, in terms of appearance, temperament and presentational style.
Since the advent of the republic, political scientists and junkies alike have discussed what being “presidential” means in the context of the American system and this has certainly evolved over the years. As is the case with so many other aspects of our constitutional democracy, presidential-ness has been handed down as one of the traditions that binds our entire system together. Throughout our history and especially in modern times, this characteristic projects a sense of stability in the White House — a sense of unwavering decency and decorum in a nation with the capacity to destroy civilization a thousand times over.
There’s a dignified, statesmanlike quality that’s required of the U.S. presidency, a humble and benevolent posture that’s ideally commensurate with great power, offering both foreign allies and American voters alike a palpable sense of confident stability. Trump somehow managed to evade having all of the above and, with the help of Vladimir Putin and millions of gullible voters, won anyway.
Presidential historian Douglas Brinkley described being presidential this way:
I think the most important aspect of being presidential is to not scare the world or the American people that you’re going to do something irrational — going into war in a willy-nilly fashion, using sloppy language that disturbs allies, being too jingoistic in presentation to the point that the rest of the world’s economic markets start wondering what’s going on in the United States. So it’s really about gravitas, of showing that you’re ready for the big game and that you understand that you have to act in a professional and in a sane manner.
What we’ve seen from Trump so far, be it during his campaign or the current transition, is a man who absolutely fails to live up to the basic standards of being presidential and indeed appears to be the exact opposite of presidential. Yet his people love him for it.
The entire standard has been rendered irrelevant — dead. Sixty-two million voters decided that being presidential doesn’t matter anymore and tragically every last Trump voter is about to discover why rejecting the presidential qualification was a blunder of historic proportions. The repercussions of this will be far-reaching and in so many ways irreparable.
Due to a general lack of education combined with the distracting misinformation of social media, few voters understand that with the country’s status as superpower there’s a set of written and unwritten rules meant to prevent the chief executive from drifting into “autocratic despot” territory and thus sparking sheer panic abroad among nations that rely on our support and reliability. Trump doesn’t care about these rules, and the destabilization that is likely to result will be horrendous.
Based on Brinkley’s standards, Trump doesn’t care about scaring the world with his cartoonish irrationality. If he did, he’d delete his Twitter account and stop doing victory rallies. Whether he’s attacking Vanity Fair for giving the Trump Grill a bad review, toying with Taiwan and China in less than 140 characters, stirring up his throng of disciples by screeching vague and overt threats against his enemies or wake at the crack of dawn attacking Alec Baldwin, Trump’s public behavior seems more like a morning-zoo shock jock than a leader who’s about to take control of the world’s largest stockpile of nuclear weapons.
Amazingly, Trump’s rallies are less presidential than his tweets, if that’s even possible. Never in the history of the modern presidency has a president-elect gone around to friendly crowds and recounted the election-night television coverage, while ham-fistedly mocking various news anchors. Never in the history of the modern presidency has a president-elect ranted incoherently about how he won “in a landslide” even though he lost the popular vote by a wide margin and received fewer electoral votes than roughly 46 out of 58 previous winners.
Last edited:
