• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Proof: HKG Detained Terrex because they had working 7.62mm GPMG on board

virus

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
mojito said:
Well said sir virus! You are a true blue kumgong sinkie, follow the straight and narrow! :rolleyes: But that is besides the point. Detaining the vehicles is excessive if small arms smuggling is the problem. Anybody can see that.
Click to expand...

sir, if you volunteer and they still neber alest you then i believe your story.

smuggling small arms nowadays should be leegalized. otherwise you will not trumpeting with small hands.
 
mojito

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
virus said:
sir, if you volunteer and they still neber alest you then i believe your story.

smuggling small arms nowadays should be leegalized. otherwise you will not trumpeting with small hands.
Click to expand...

But will they arrest my car and everything inside? No case! :mad:
 
virus

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
u dont try we will neber know.... but if you drive a branded car and look like farkface from sakae sushi, most unlikely. they may even kowtow to you n offer polis escort for you for 1 year free
 
B

Bigfuck

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Papsmearer said:
You are exactly right. I can bet you that the GPMG were not declared.
Click to expand...
US military also send GPMG via various tranport services. It is declared on the manifest. So if ours were not, it is clear. BS on sovereign immunity if it ain't diplomatic shippment.
 
S

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
I doubt it had anything to do with the declaration per se. Probably an excuse while they examine why the US shortlisted the Terrex. The thing about we training in Taiwan while for the One China policy is another smokescreen as it not a secret. Go to any forum on SAF and Taiwan and its all there to see. If anyone is charged by the HK authorities for failing to declare, it is to please the ignorant masses that it was indeed a purely enforcement action.


More importantly we fucked up by giving them the oppotunity.

blackmore said:
I suspected much more were not declared in these fiasco to cause the entire shipment to be detained. Anything can be shipped as long it is properly declared. Let's see who's head is gonna row after CNY.
Click to expand...
 
Victory2016

Victory2016

Alfrescian
Loyal
Will the USA now buy the Terrex now that their specs are known to their potential enemies?

Will SAF be giving out more medals to their paper Generals for this incident? I am sure MRT boss would like to have a few more to keep up with the North Koreans.....

soldier-medals-1024x547.jpg
 
Papsmearer

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Victory2016 said:
Will the USA now buy the Terrex now that their specs are known to their potential enemies?

Will SAF be giving out more medals to their paper Generals for this incident? I am sure MRT boss would like to have a few more to keep up with the North Koreans.....

soldier-medals-1024x547.jpg
Click to expand...

As I mentioned in this thread, at No.5 of the original post, I think the US will run far away from this. They will have a hard time explaining to the congressional watch dogs why they are buying a compromised IFV.

http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread....ation-in-HKG-The-Implications-and-Revelations
 
eatshitndie

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Papsmearer said:
As I mentioned in this thread, at No.5 of the original post, I think the US will run far away from this. They will have a hard time explaining to the congressional watch dogs why they are buying a compromised IFV.

http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread....ation-in-HKG-The-Implications-and-Revelations
Click to expand...

the terrex 2 that the usmc is testing is vastly different from this older model. but as in all older/newer variants, there are commonalities and same vulnerabilities. it's the risk of chicoms finding out the same "archilles heel" that may prompt the usmc to tread cautiously and delay any decision on acquiring the t2.
 
Papsmearer

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
eatshitndie said:
the terrex 2 that the usmc is testing is vastly different from this older model. but as in all older/newer variants, there are commonalities and same vulnerabilities. it's the risk of chicoms finding out the same "archilles heel" that may prompt the usmc to tread cautiously and delay any decision on acquiring the t2.
Click to expand...

yes, you are right. the engine might be a larger one, the tranny might be a heavier one to handle the horse power increase, and overall weight might be more, etc. But the design philosophy is the same. i.e. balance of the armour, where the emphasis is on, etc. For that alone, the USMC should drop the Terrex like a hot potato.
 
mojito

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
Notice how the thread starter shifts away from his original claim that HK port authorities was honorable and only held back our Terrex because we had illegally stored small arms in the op boxes. No case lah! All change topic or hiding away. :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top