I bet they are hiring a bunch of pinoys for the positions let go. And they will report savings later in wages. Smart move.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Chitchat Surbana Employees Pawned Deep Deep!
- Thread starter Pinkieslut
- Start date
But of course you retrench poor performers. Where got retrench good performers one? Who don't like more money?
But of course you retrench poor performers. Where got retrench good performers one? Who don't like more money?
The whole issue appeared to be structured like a retrenchment although they term in a dismissal of poor-performers. Poor-performers don't appear overnight and they are usually dismissed over an extended period of time because u need to hire sufficient suitably-qualified staff to replace them before letting them go as a cohort.
This is the best time to retrench. As a GLC, they are likely to issue some bonus, eg. teachers got 3-4 months last year in total. Evil HR will just use part of the bonus for the whole company as the part of the compensation package if they dismiss the staff as "retrenchment". The remaining staff will mentally-adjusted to be thankful for retaining their jobs although their bonus is reduced.
Hi there
1. The 50 affected sheep can opt for plan B mah.
2. Grab or uber.
3. Beware sheep! Tombmasick also has one hand there
1. The 50 affected sheep can opt for plan B mah.
2. Grab or uber.
3. Beware sheep! Tombmasick also has one hand there
The old don't go, how the new arrive? Of course you clean out the poor performers so you can hire better performers. So it is not a retrenchment you understand? Retrenchment mean no business so lay off cut costs. You see how crowded all the eateries are? Economy is brimming with confidence for the future, with you for you for Singapore!
People got to eat lah. So of course the eateries are crowded. GLC is not an accurate indicator of where the economy is heading. It is unlikely that Ho Ching will ever be kicked out unless the husband has to run road.
More accurate to look at other indicators like how the businesses in Spore are really doing, number of people trying to save $ by going to JB,
I know of a few working in tuas choose to resign themselves.
those who survived were given C and D grading
D mean no bonus
C mean a little bit
those who survived were given C and D grading
D mean no bonus
C mean a little bit
Please help me to congratulate those that resign themselves . They will be a better person.
Thanks
what is wrong with Master beating his dogs? Next story
Surbana ‘did not
follow due process’ in sacking unionised staff
Surbana Jurong group chief executive Wong Heang Fine told staff in an email sent on Tuesday that the 54 axed workers were poor performers who could not be allowed to affect the rest of the organisation negatively.
In his post, Mr Nasordin noted that eight of the affected workers were staff who were offered re-employment, or contract renewal. “Why did the company offer them re-employment or renew their contract if their performance was not satisfactory to begin with? Why did the company not allow these long-serving staff to see out their contracts?” he said.
“Some even cleared their performance review in July.”
Adding that the “timing of the termination leaves much to be desired”, Mr Nasordin also said: “It is not surprising for the public to have the perception that SJ (Surbana Jurong) is avoiding compensating the workers.”
Surbana Jurong group chief executive Wong Heang Fine.
Surbana Jurong group chief executive Wong Heang Fine told staff in an email sent on Tuesday that the 54 axed workers were poor performers who could not be allowed to affect the rest of the organisation negatively.
In his post, Mr Nasordin noted that eight of the affected workers were staff who were offered re-employment, or contract renewal. “Why did the company offer them re-employment or renew their contract if their performance was not satisfactory to begin with? Why did the company not allow these long-serving staff to see out their contracts?” he said.
“Some even cleared their performance review in July.”
Adding that the “timing of the termination leaves much to be desired”, Mr Nasordin also said: “It is not surprising for the public to have the perception that SJ (Surbana Jurong) is avoiding compensating the workers.”
Surbana Jurong group chief executive Wong Heang Fine.
Surbana ‘did not follow due process’ in sacking unionised staff
Surbana Jurong group chief executive Wong Heang Fine told staff in an email sent on Tuesday that the 54 axed workers were poor performers who could not be allowed to affect the rest of the organisation negatively.
In his post, Mr Nasordin noted that eight of the affected workers were staff who were offered re-employment, or contract renewal. “Why did the company offer them re-employment or renew their contract if their performance was not satisfactory to begin with? Why did the company not allow these long-serving staff to see out their contracts?” he said.
“Some even cleared their performance review in July.”
Adding that the “timing of the termination leaves much to be desired”, Mr Nasordin also said: “It is not surprising for the public to have the perception that SJ (Surbana Jurong) is avoiding compensating the workers.”
Surbana Jurong group chief executive Wong Heang Fine.
wonderful to hear such news. its time for sinkies to buck up esp the property and financial people and civil service where there are alot of deadwood. such firings are the norm in the west and should be not be a surprise so those bastards unions(who are also deadwoods caught off guard) should just shutup. hahahhah. really good to retrench useless MC seekers, and those females who does nothing but reproduce like rats and takes MCs and maternity leaves agaain and again and hardly work or around as they are busing at home having sex . my dept have females who just get pregnant twice in 1 year!!!! and takes lots of MCs to see doctors and then take another 4 months maternity leave etc. so effectively not around half the time and yet have to pay for these deadwood as full salary. no wonder the local economy is in shits as how unproductive they are. even before labour they start complaining about how tired and back aches etc. really sick of these whiners primadonna behaving as if they own the companies.
Similar threads
