• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Americans knew that Chinese Sub Launched 巨浪-3 SLBM at California Coast - Videos

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is the world's most deadly stunt, point-blank nuke, captured by news helicopter. Silent stealth sub right inside US waters off California Beach. MORE THAN JUST ONCE. USA unable to detect nor prevent. Totally Unable to react at all. Just act blur. It is clearly proven that if Beijing wanted USA nuked clean, it's fleet of subs can penetrate US defense so up close, and pop hundreds of nuke warheads to any targets desired, and finished USA off within less than 10 mins from launch, undetected, unstoppable.

http://osnetdaily.com/2016/08/mysterious-chinese-missile-seen-california/


Mysterious Chinese Missile seen from California
August 1, 2016
0
2609
Share on Facebook
Tweet on Twitter



Asia Times

Californians seem to be seeing a lot of meteor showers recently, or so they think.
trident-missile.jpg


On November 7, 2015, they watched the US Navy’s nuclear-capable Trident II ballistic missile light up the sky in Los Angeles.

On Wednesday July 27, 2016, they watched the Chinese CZ-7 rocket light up the sky again over the Inland Empire, Ventura County, Orange County and beyond. The streaks were also seen in Nevada and Arizona.

The rocket was launched on June 25 from China’s Wenchang Satellite Launch Center in Hainan, and U.S. Strategic Command spokeswoman Julie Ziegenhorn confirmed the command often sees re-entries of rockets. However, officials from Nellis Air Force Base in southern Nevada had earlier said the light was a meteor breaking up.

Rockets heading to orbit shed components that fall back to Earth, which can be seen when they flare up due to friction as they re-enter the atmosphere.

The Chang Zheng-7 rocket, or Long March 7, is China’s largest space launch vehicle to date and carried three important payloads in its cargo: the Tianyuan 1 satellite refueling system, LM-7 Upper Stage to remove space debris, and Next Generation Crewed Vehicle which is a reentry test item.

These projects complement the Tiangong 2 space station that is undergoing final rounds of testing before its launch later this year in mid-September, highlighting China’s aim to become a leading space power.

In fact in November 2010, there was another mysterious sighting of what appeared to be a missile contrail over California, which the Pentagon attributed to an airplane, but retired US Air Force Lt. General Tom Mcinerney believed it was a missile launched from a submarine.

And although the Pentagon confirmed a US submarine off the coast of California launched the Trident missiles in November 2015, oddly it never confirmed what was the mysterious launch in November 2010.

This led to speculation by some pundits that the mysterious contrail was from a Chinese missile launched by a Hainan-based Jin-class SSBN submarine off the California coast, to display Beijing’s displeasure over US and allied naval exercises in the South China and Yellow Sea earlier that year. Reportedly some Asian intelligence sources believe the submarine transited from Hainan through South Pacific waters where US anti-submarine warfare detection capabilities are not as effective, and then transited north to waters off Los Angeles.

This seems far-fetched, but the ability of Chinese submarines to sneak up on the US undetected is not entirely implausible, given in 2007 a Chinese submarine popped up in the middle of a US naval exercise and embarrassed the military chiefs. By the time the 160ft Song Class diesel-electric attack submarine surfaced, it was within viable range of launching torpedoes or missiles at the U.S.S. Kitty Hawk—a 1,000ft aircraft supercarrier with 4,500 personnel on board.

In October 2015, a Chinese submarine again stalked the U.S.S. Ronald Reagan for “at least half a day” off the coast of Japan, although the US Navy declined to disclose whether it was able to detect the submarine before it surfaced. The U.S.S. Ronald Reagan is a 1,092ft Nimitz class supercarrier with 3,200 personnel on board.

In a 24 July South China Morning Post article, military observers believe the actual reason for China’s claim over the South China Sea is to protect its expanding submarine fleet stationed in the Yulin naval base in Hainan, with unrestricted access to the waters of the Pacific Ocean.

In fact on 12 July, the same day the Permanent Court of Arbitration at the Hague announced that China’s claims over the South China Sea had no legal basis, a photograph was “leaked” of China’s most advanced nuclear-powered submarine.

It revealed the expanded type 094A “Jin-class” submarine, leading to speculation that the vessel might be capable of delivering China’s new generation ICBM the JL-3, whose estimated range of 12,000km could reach the US from the South China Sea.

With increased frequency of both US and China launching missiles and rockets, and playing cat and mouse games with attack submarines and aircraft carriers, it likely won’t be long before Californians have another sighting of meteor showers.




http://www.space.com/9543-infamous-contrail-aka-mystery-missile-spotted-satellite-image.html

Infamous Contrail (aka the 'Mystery Missile') Spotted in Satellite Image
By SPACE.com Staff | November 16, 2010 05:36pm ET

MORE

Infamous Contrail (aka the 'Mystery Missile') Spotted in Satellite Image
mystery-contrail-satellite-image-101116-02.jpg

The 'mystery' contrail is visible as a horizontal white streak in the middle of the lower left quadrant of this image, captured by the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite 11. The satellite is a partnership between NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Credit: NASA/NOAA

When an impressive contrail was spotted off the California coast last week, it sparked widespread reports of a mystery missile launch in the area ? a theory the Pentagon squashed after initial investigations. But, the odd contrail fooled more than the public and media, and was even seen from space.

After watching footage of the Nov. 8 contrail, Patrick Minnis, a contrail expert in the Science Directorate at NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va., assumed it came from a missile, as many others did.

He even said so in response to a phone call from a reporter. [7 Things That Make Great Space Hoaxes]

"She responded with links to two different blogs that compared it to older aircraft contrail pictures, and indicated that the blog authors thought it was an aircraft contrail," Minnis said of the reporter. "I had not really thought about that aspect previously and, at first glance, the video showed what looked like a missile launch. Once the idea that it was an aircraft contrail entered my head, I had to pay closer attention, because aircraft contrails are part of my job description."

Later, he learned that fellow NASA scientist Doug Spangenberg had pieced together a photo of the mystery contrail from space after sifting through weather satellite images.

Missile vs. contrail

Minnis typically studies contrails in order to determine their effect on Earth's climate. He and other scientists have discovered that airplane contrails create cirrus clouds on days they wouldn't usually exist.

According to his calculations, the cirrus-cloud cover over the United States is increasing by 1 percent each decade as a result, effectively contributing to global warming by blocking the release of heat from the planet.

Minnis used that experience to examine the California contrail, which had been seen near Catalina Island, off the coast of Los Angeles.

"It appeared to be between two high clouds, one in foreground and one in the background," Minnis said. "I would have expected that it was at the same level or above the high clouds, so it should have been obscured more by the cloud in the background. Thus, I concluded again that it was a missile."

Satellite photos tell the tale

Minnis then tried a different approach, this time with the Spangenberg, who also works at Langley Research Center. Spangenberg had sequenced imagery from the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite 11 (GOES-11) that showed a persistent contrail that could match the mystery contrail.

With the help of other Langley researchers, Minnis also learned that on Nov. 9, conditions were "ripe" for persistent contrails over the Pacific west of Los Angeles, but that the contrails would only survive for a short time closer to the coast.

"As it turns out, the high clouds seen in the background of the video were actually behind the contrail because the plane had flown north of the clouds, and changed course to the northeast, so that the clouds were behind the contrail as viewed from Catalina Island," Minnis said. "All of that information changed my mind."

Based on his research, Minnis said he can't definitively prove that the contrail came from an airplane. But, it is the "most likely" scenario given the data.

"Later, while viewing some blogs, I found that the contrail corresponded remarkably well with flight AWE808, which flew from Hawaii to Phoenix; it showed the change in course to the northeast at the same location, further confirming my conclusion."

After an initial investigation, the military quashed the "mystery missile" scenario, with many other experts also suggesting the contrail was caused by a run-of-the-mill jet aircraft.

"While there is nothing at this time that leads the Department of Defense to believe this is a missile launch, the department and other U.S. government agencies with expertise in aviation and space continue to look into the condensation trail (contrail) seen and reported off the coast of southern California on Monday evening," DoD spokesman Col. Dave Lapan said last week.

7 Things That Create Great Space Hoaxes
Most Destructive Space Weapons Concepts
Top 10 Greatest Explosions Ever, Bizarre Sky Spiral From Missile





https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-sg/%E5%B7%A8%E6%B5%AA%E7%B3%BB%E5%88%97%E5%AF%BC%E5%B C%B9

??????
????????????
Antistub.svg
?????????2007?9?26??
???????????????????????????????????????????? ???

???????????????????????????????????“JL-?”??????-1????JL-1?????“CSS-?”(Chinese,Surface-to-Surface)????????????????????????????????????????
????

??-1??????
??-2??????
??-3??????

????
??
????????? ?????????
???? ????

????
??????

? ? ?

?????????

?????
????

??

??-1x · ??-11 · ??-15 · ??-16 · BP-12A ·
??

??-2x · ??-21 · ??-25 ·
??

??-3x>??-3A · ??-4 · ??-26
??

??-5 · ??-31 · ??-41
??

??-1x · ??-2 · ??-3
????

??????

C-701 ·
??????

??-1 · ??-2 · ??-3 · ??-1 · ??-2 · ??-10 · ??-10
?????

????x · ????x · ????x · ????x · ????x · XW-41 · ??-62 · C-701 · C-704 · ??-8 · ??-82
?????

????x · ????x · ??-83 · ??-84 · ??-12 · P-270 · 3M-54
????

??-1 · ??-2 · ??-3
?????

265-Ix · J-201x · J-202x · ??-73 · ??-8 · ??-9 · ??-10 · ??-12 · 9K116“??”

????
??????

9K32 · ??-1 · ??-2 · ??-5?A/B/C? · ??-6 · ??-7
??????

S-75 · ??-6?61/63/64/65? · ??-7?A/B? · ??-10 · ??-17 · ??-18
???/??????

??-1 · ??-2??/?? · ??-3 · ??-12 · ??-16?A/B?
???/??????

S-300?FM/PMU1/PMU2? · ??-4 · ??-5 · ??-8 · ??-9?A/B? · ??-22
????/??????

??-19 · ??-29
?????/????

??-1 · ??-2 · ??-3 · ??-409 · ??-26

?????
????

??????

AKD-10 · AR-1 · ??-63 (KD-63) · C-704KD · KD-88 · Kh-59 · Kh-29
??????

??-10 · ??-1 · ??-2 · ??-3
?????

??-6 · ??-62 · C-701 · C-704 · C-705 · ??-81 · Kh-35 · ??-9
?????

???? · 3M-54E · ??-85 · ??-12 · ??-91
???

??-7 · ??-5 (??-61) · Kh-31P · ??-91 · ??-10
?????

??-73 · ??-8 · AR-1 · AKD-9 · AKD-10
????

LS · LT · FT · KAB-1500Kr · KAB-500Kr

?????
?????

??-1x · ??-2x · ??-3x · ??-5x · ??-6 · ??-7x · ??-8 · ??-9x · ??-90 · ??-1 · ??-2 · ??-3 · ??-4 · ??-11 · ??-18
????????

??-4x · ??-10 · ??-11 · ??-12 · ??-13
?????????????

? ? ?

??????????? ?????????
??
????
??????? · ???????
??
???? · ???? · ????
????
??????
??? · ????? · ????? · ??? · ???????
????
???????? · ??????? · ?????? · ?????? · ???????? · ?????? · ?????? · ?????? · ??????? · ???????? · ?????
??
??

??????
?????????
???? · ???????? · ????? · ?????

??????
?????????
?????????? · ?????? · ????? · ?????

??????
?????????
??????
????? · ?????
??????
????? · ?????
??????
????? · ?????
??
??
??
??

??????
???
????
????
001?
???
052D? · 052C? · 052B? · 052? · 051C? · 051B? · 051? · 956E? · 956EM?
???
054A? · 054? · 053H3? · 053H2G? · 053H2? · 053H1G? · 053H1? · 053H? · 056A? · 056?
??
????
???
022? · 037II? · 037IG?
???
026? · 027?
??
62? · 206?
???
037IS? · 037I? · 037? · 062I?
?????
????
081? · 082II? · 082I? · 082? · 058? · 312?
????
???
?????? · ????????
?????
904? · 904A? · 903? · 903A? · 905? · 908?

????
???????
094? · 092?
??????
093? · 093A? · 091?
??????????
033G?
????????
877EKM? · 636? · 039A? · 039? · 035? · 035B? · 032?

????
?? · ??? · ???? · ??????

?????
???
?-15 · ?-15S
????
??-5
???
?-8 · ?-9C · ?-18 · ?-27 · ?-31
???
??200 · ??2000
???
?-6K
?????
?-30MK2 · ??-7A · ?-16
???
?-8DH · ?-10A · ?-11BS

?????
??????
?????
071?
?????
072? · 072II? · 072III? · 072A?
?????
079II? · 073? · 073A? · 073II? · 073III?
?????
?????
?????
074? · 074A? · 271? · 271II? · 271III? · 271IIIA?
?????
724?????? · 726?????? · 958??????
??
????
????? · ?????? · ????? · ???? · ???? · ????
????
???? · ????? · ?????
?????? · 2009????? · ???????
??
??
??????? · ???????? · ????
??
??? · ??? · ???
??
????
?? · ??? · ??? · ??? · ????? · ?? · ??? · ??? · ??? · ?? · ??? · ??? · ???
????
??? · ?? · ??? · ???
????
??? · ??? · ??? · ??? · ?? · ??
????
??? · ?? · ???
???

??????

????

????
??
??
????
??

??
??

????

??
??
????

??

??
????
????
????
????
????

??

??
????
?????
????
????
????
IRC????
????
??????
??????

??

????
????
????
????
?????
????
????
?????
????

????

????
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
american not worried because they will need blood in order to launch any full scale attack, these cheena stunts adds up no more then masturbation acts. real warfare do not need long range missiles or subs to deliver nukeheads. all you need to delivery them in a locked box inside an embassy safe box and a detonator.
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
Chinese people deserved to be raped and pillaged repeatedly by barbarian hordes and their women got used to multiple rapes and enjoyed it and became prostitutes.
 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
This tread is a classic Blow Cow attempt.

This information is not claimed by the PRC nor it's people, but instead it is DIRECTLY by the AMERICANS THEMSELVES. PLA are acting blur all the way, but hidden inside their stealth submarines they are enjoying their good laughs. They will never admit doing anything. Americans COULD NOT PROVE and DARE NOT PROVE these. FAILED TO STOP PLA. INCAPABLE TO DETECT NOR TRACK PLA.
Can you read properly? Pse?
 
Last edited:

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
Chinese people deserved to be raped and pillaged repeatedly by barbarian hordes and their women got used to multiple rapes and enjoyed it and became prostitutes.

I read that that you are fearful of and incapable of overcoming the Chinese, and can only vent your emotion by posting the aboves. :biggrin: I read your mind.
 

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://baike.baidu.com/view/5971132.htm


096????????

096????????????????Tang-class???????????????????????????094?????????
??????????????????????096???????????16-24???094??12????094???????????????-2????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???10????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????096??
??????“????”????????096??????????????????????????? ?096?????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????096?????????????????????????[1]

???
096????
???
Tang-class
????
??
? ?
094?
? ?
?????

???
?????
? ?
???
? ?
?
? ?
16-24???-2???-3
? ?
533???????
? ?
???

??

1 ????
2 ????
? ????
? ????
3 ????

????
??096?????????“?”??????????????????150????20?????? ?16000???????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????32?????????????????????????????6 00??[1]
????
????
096??????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????II?????????????II??????III???12000km????????? ???????2~3??????????III?????13000~15000km[2]
????
???????652mm????6?533???????????24??? 324MM????????????????????24??????????????????????? ??????533???????????????????????[3]
????
??2007?7??????????????????????096????????????????? ?????????????????094?“?”??????????????? ???094?“?”??????????????????????????????????094??? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????094?????????????????094????????????????????? ?????????????????
?????“???????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????”
2010?12????????????????????????9??????????????096? ?????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????3?5??????????????????? ???????????????????????????????-31A???????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????“?????????????????? ”??????“?????????????????????????????????”???????? ??????????????????094???????????????092 ??????????????094????????12???-2?????????????????????????4000???????????????094?? ????????????????????????????????096??????????????2 4????????
????096???????150???094?140????????20 ???094? 12.5?????????????20,000??094?12,000???????? 16,000???????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????32???????????????????????? ???????600???????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????95-100??????094???115????????????092?094???096??????? ??????????


 
Last edited:

war is best form of peace

Alfrescian
Loyal
The basic facts are very SIMPLE.

The US Navy admitted more than once that PLA Subs had followed and tracked their fleets at oceans, especially popped out reassuringly among the US Naval Fleets during their exercise and vanished again. And obviously the US Navy couldn't find the PLA subs, and they came and left nor stalked the US Navy as and when they liked. These are admitted facts on the American part.

Therefore, there is absolutely no surprise at all, that PLA sub can freely enter California Coast or any where else in US coast. Remember California has biggest US Naval base of San Diego, that means PLA launched SLBM test just under Uncle Sam's asshole. If it was a nuke it is almost instantly taking out San Diego base and many others well within mins.


Img251340478.jpg


hqdefault.jpg
 
Last edited:
Top