• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Cina tell PAP: You have broken HK's Law & 1-Cina Policy!

Pinkieslut

Alfrescian
Loyal
Singapore must abide by Hong Kong laws on impounded vehicles, Beijing says

Central government digs in its heels on seizure, citing one-China policy and local rules in response to city state’s demand for an explanation

Singapore military vehicle seizure
Beijing reiterated its call for Singapore to respect the one-China policy and abide by Hong Kong law on Wednesday, to help properly resolve the controversy over the impounding of the city state’s armoured vehicles.

Analysts said that the remarks by Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang reflected Beijing’s frustration over Singapore’s handling of its ties with Taiwan, and the fact that the two nations still had unsettled issues.

Singapore’s Ministry of Defence repeated on Tuesday that it had yet to receive a formal explanation about the impounding of nine of its armoured troop carriers by Hong Kong customs, two weeks after the saga erupted.

Inside the Terrex military vehicle at the centre of Singapore-China storm

The vehicles were impounded in Hong Kong as they were being delivered back to Singapore after they were used for training in Taiwan. The vehicles are believed to have been employed as part of Project Starlight – an agreement reached between the city state and Taipei more than four decades ago that allows Singaporean troops to train in Taiwan.

“We hope related parties can stick to the one-China policy and abide by laws and regulations in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region,” Lu said.

The dispute comes at a time of cool relations between China and Singapore, which is viewed by Beijing as backing the Philippines in its territorial dispute with China.

Singapore and Taiwan have a long military relationship, with the space-starved city state sending thousands of troops a year for training alongside Taiwan’s military under Project Starlight.

There may be trouble ahead for China and Singapore

Beijing opposes other countries having any form of official exchanges with Taipei, including military ones.

“For Singapore, it may think its military training in Taiwan is just habitual. But the seized armoured vehicles gave China a chance to draw a red line for Singapore,” said Xu Liping, a senior researcher specialising in Southeast Asian studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

“Singapore’s Project Starlight broke the one-China policy, and Beijing wants Singapore to respect China’s core interests,” Xu added.

Dai Fan, a Southeast Asia analyst at Jinan University in Guangzhou, said Project Starlight had continued for decades, and that Singapore would not abandon it.

Singapore armoured vehicles held in Hong Kong should be ‘melted down’, says Chinese state tabloid

“And after taking Singapore’s long relationship with Taiwan and the US pivot to Asia strategy into consideration, I do not think Singapore will switch the project from Taiwan to the Chinese mainland,” said Dai, referring to Beijing offering the city state the use of Hainan as a training base.

“Singapore might concede to a certain extent, but it’s difficult for Singapore to totally abandon Taiwan,” he said.

Lee Chi-horng, a research fellow at the Singapore-based Longus Research Institute, said Beijing was dismayed that Singaporean Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen had kept pressing Hong Kong to give legal reasons for impounding the vehicles.
 

Force 136

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Up to now, both sides have not revealed which laws had been broken.

SAF should take the case to Court to force HK customs to release the impounded vehicles if no law had been broken. Conversely, HK should charge the SAF in Court if HK Laws had indeed been violated .....
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Up to now, both sides have not revealed which laws had been broken.

SAF should take the case to Court to force HK customs to release the impounded vehicles if no law had been broken. Conversely, HK should charge the SAF in Court if HK Laws had indeed been violated .....

all you need to do is search the statutes on hk port authority transhipment and in-transit laws. they even presented the laws and explained the difference between transhipment and in-transit in several import/export presentations and trade shows all over the globe since 2012. if i can find them, so can you. banned items or items that are liable for seizure or impound are munitions, sensitive items without a license, and wmd material.

sinkies better be careful what you ask for, constantly kpkb about "show me the law" and "where is the letter of the law" and other insignificant bs. last 2 things you want are hongkies throwing the book at you (they will as they are busy doing their homework and drafting up charges) and dragging you through hk courts. best is to stfu and negotiate behind closed doors.
 
Last edited:

Sideswipe

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
it's strange that SG carried out military exercises with both Taiwan and China. Taiwan ought to be worried. something has got to give.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
it's strange that SG carried out military exercises with both Taiwan and China. Taiwan ought to be worried. something has got to give.

it's not strange. sinkie uncles have been known to fuck the peidu mama while banging the pdmm's estranged grown up daughter. sg and sinkie uncles are alike. both are a match made in the semen of the south seas.
 

Thick Face Black Heart

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
“For Singapore, it may think its military training in Taiwan is just habitual. But the seized armoured vehicles gave China a chance to draw a red line for Singapore,” said Xu Liping, a senior researcher specialising in Southeast Asian studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

“Singapore’s Project Starlight broke the one-China policy, and Beijing wants Singapore to respect China’s core interests,” Xu added.

Dai Fan, a Southeast Asia analyst at Jinan University in Guangzhou, said Project Starlight had continued for decades, and that Singapore would not abandon it.

Singapore armoured vehicles held in Hong Kong should be ‘melted down’, says Chinese state tabloid

“And after taking Singapore’s long relationship with Taiwan and the US pivot to Asia strategy into consideration, I do not think Singapore will switch the project from Taiwan to the Chinese mainland,” said Dai, referring to Beijing offering the city state the use of Hainan as a training base.

“Singapore might concede to a certain extent, but it’s difficult for Singapore to totally abandon Taiwan,” he said.

Lee Chi-horng, a research fellow at the Singapore-based Longus Research Institute, said Beijing was dismayed that Singaporean Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen had kept pressing Hong Kong to give legal reasons for impounding the vehicles.


All I see are research academics pushing China's line and being obedient lap dogs, trying to bark loudly, etc.

What I want to see are more Chinese senior officials come out and do the barking. So far, all muted.

This shows China has no intention of escalating the issue and merely want their lowly academic lapdogs to stir up a storm in a teacup so as to appease their own citizens.
 

Cottonmouth

Alfrescian
Loyal
CBLOONG tell people to follow law, now people also tell him to follow law. :biggrin:
He should learn when to keep his cheebye mouth shut.
 

KuanTi01

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
SAF cock up! Haven't we heard it so often while doing our NS? No need for legal reasons . NEH still trying to act like a hero. He should fly in to HK & then Beijing to beg for forgiveness. Singapore is widely viewed as a double-headed snake in bothPRC & ROC.
 

numero uno

Alfrescian
Loyal
Up to now, both sides have not revealed which laws had been broken.

SAF should take the case to Court to force HK customs to release the impounded vehicles if no law had been broken. Conversely, HK should charge the SAF in Court if HK Laws had indeed been violated .....

i think the singapore side screwed up badly. the china is basically telling them to FO. this is my country and I can do as I think fit. you can throw temper tantrums but it gets you nowhere. in fact it just show your impotence and furtehr humilates you. even if there is a legal basis why should I tell you? it's like the servant telling the master where he has gone wrong. it is an insult when you have broken the law in the first place. it is below PLA to tell you why they confiscate the terrexs. really stupid ministarrs. really stupid SAF and its masters. just show how inexperienced they are. just like indonesians and their forest burning haze. who gives a damn shit what you think. all those crap propaganda past 20 years by politicians about punching above your weight now looks ridiculous and just hot air. only way to get it back is to apologize(which these stuck ups would never do) or go to war(which obviously they won't SAF is just like a fly buzzing around an elephant). hence the so called "stale mate" which is not a stale mate but a lesson in humility. the furtehr it drags the worse and more impotent SAF looks.
 
Last edited:

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This is a place where the Ministry of Law welcomed the Rule of Law Index, noting that Singapore is the only Asian country that has made it to the top 10-so they should go "law by law"(as my riflemen like to say!) and use legal recourse to get the terrex back.
They should send people like part time MP Murali Pillai or Davinder Singh (who won against Roy) to fight their case.,
 

numero uno

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is a place where the Ministry of Law welcomed the Rule of Law Index, noting that Singapore is the only Asian country that has made it to the top 10-so they should go "law by law"(as my riflemen like to say!) and use legal recourse to get the terrex back.
They should send people like part time MP Murali Pillai or Davinder Singh (who won against Roy) to fight their case.,

typical stupid sinkie response and arrogance. pillai and davinder singh are nothing to the HK and China people. you think they bother who they are. they would send a junior provincial clerk to the courts proceedings and would ask these guys to file their defence in putonghua to insult them . and to insult sinkies even more demand the whole proceedings be conducted in Mandarin or cantonese. Game over even before they can open their mouth. hahahhahah
never underestimate the mainland chinese people. I have done business with them and they think sinkies lawyers are a joke. look at suzhou and you get the whole story. only sinkies think they they are center of the world. till today I laughed when they tell me some of the incredible true stories of how they made them run around in circles.even Deng XP could not botehred to help sinkies MNCs as it is considered a trivial matter.
 
Last edited:

ckmpd

Alfrescian
Loyal
Up to now, both sides have not revealed which laws had been broken.

SAF should take the case to Court to force HK customs to release the impounded vehicles if no law had been broken. Conversely, HK should charge the SAF in Court if HK Laws had indeed been violated .....

Let China and HK keep mum and let the pap guess
 

red amoeba

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Forget about the 9 pieces of scrap. LHL shed just call Tsai and invite her to come Singapore for visit. Tit for tat.
 
Top