[video=youtube_share;29ZTc8moIvM]https://youtu.be/29ZTc8moIvM[/video]
You agree
?
You agree
?
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Chitchat PRC Says Terrex is 1990s Technology from US and Sinkies have no Talent!
- Thread starter Pinkieslut
- Start date
Looks the same. Is Taiwan helping us or we are helping Taiwan?
To b exact it's 1988. Any vehicle tat carry a pre historic namesake is definitely passe. U don't need an expert to tell it apart.
cannot be lah......... CTO of ST Kinetics Dr Richard Kwok Wai Onn like dat meh......................??
judge for yourself by mere appearance and external features.
roc cloud leopard....
saf terrex av81
terrex 2 (under field tests by u.s. marines)
Except for some air force planes, the rest of SAF's hardware all prehistoric one.
The AMX-13 and centurion tanks circa 1940s-50s for example still in use until later 90s.
Air force also used their A4 Skyhawks and F5s not willing to decommission
The AMX-13 and centurion tanks circa 1940s-50s for example still in use until later 90s.
Air force also used their A4 Skyhawks and F5s not willing to decommission
You agree
The appearance maybe the same, it the internal that is the difference.
