• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Terrex Saga - The Arrogance

Pinkieslut

Alfrescian
Loyal
According to StatesTimesReview (do not know how true it is):

China ignores Singapore Minister’s demand for “clear and legal” reasons for detention
written by Admin December 1, 2016



Despite a 7-hour long meeting between the Singapore diplomats and Hong Kong authorities on Nov 29, China is not acceding to Singapore Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen’s demand for “clear and legal” reasons over the detention of 9 armoured vehicles. In an update by the Ministry of Defence (MinDef), the Singapore government is arranging another meeting today (Dec 1) to demand the “formal reason” for the detention.

Earlier on Tuesday (Nov 29), Singapore Minister Ng Eng Hen provoked China further by claiming that he won’t get back the confiscated military assault vehicles if he is not given “clear and legal” reasons for the detention.

However it seems that China is not bothering itself with Singapore’s rhetoric and theatrical display because it is public knowledge that China detained the vehicles as a formal warning to Singapore for it’s anti-China moves recently. China Foreign Minister explicitly stated that it will not allow Singapore, a country it has diplomatic ties with, to conduct official ties like joint military training with Taiwan.

In August, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong offended China by telling it to respect “the rule of law” and give up its claims on the South China Sea. China instead responded that Singapore should mind its own business since it is not a claimant country. To add on to Lee Hsien Loong’s frustration, the ASEAN countries involved sided with China and agreed to settle the issue bilaterally. PM Lee Hsien Loong further aggravate the worsening relationship in November at the APEC meeting by claiming China is no longer the “middle kingdom” and should not act like so.
 

ckmpd

Alfrescian
Loyal
According to StatesTimesReview (do not know how true it is):

China ignores Singapore Minister’s demand for “clear and legal” reasons for detention
written by Admin December 1, 2016



Despite a 7-hour long meeting between the Singapore diplomats and Hong Kong authorities on Nov 29, China is not acceding to Singapore Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen’s demand for “clear and legal” reasons over the detention of 9 armoured vehicles. In an update by the Ministry of Defence (MinDef), the Singapore government is arranging another meeting today (Dec 1) to demand the “formal reason” for the detention.

Earlier on Tuesday (Nov 29), Singapore Minister Ng Eng Hen provoked China further by claiming that he won’t get back the confiscated military assault vehicles if he is not given “clear and legal” reasons for the detention.

However it seems that China is not bothering itself with Singapore’s rhetoric and theatrical display because it is public knowledge that China detained the vehicles as a formal warning to Singapore for it’s anti-China moves recently. China Foreign Minister explicitly stated that it will not allow Singapore, a country it has diplomatic ties with, to conduct official ties like joint military training with Taiwan.

In August, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong offended China by telling it to respect “the rule of law” and give up its claims on the South China Sea. China instead responded that Singapore should mind its own business since it is not a claimant country. To add on to Lee Hsien Loong’s frustration, the ASEAN countries involved sided with China and agreed to settle the issue bilaterally. PM Lee Hsien Loong further aggravate the worsening relationship in November at the APEC meeting by claiming China is no longer the “middle kingdom” and should not act like so.

I hope China will just ignore PAP's representations and stick to its rule-of-law. China will do Singaporeans a favour by teaching the pap a lesson in humility.
 

Force 136

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
China is smart that they did not involve their communist legal system to challenge Singapore. Instead, they used the English based Hong Kong legal framework......

Hong Kong's Courts and Legal System is World class.

Does Singapore have a strong case at all?
 

ckmpd

Alfrescian
Loyal
China is smart that they did not involve their communist legal system to challenge Singapore. Instead, they used the English based Hong Kong legal framework......

Hong Kong's Courts and Legal System is World class.

Does Singapore have a strong case at all?

Singapore has a case only in SG Courts
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
A taste of its own medicine for a group that like to bring people, including teenagers who criticise them to court.

They are used to getting their ways locally, but try to do the same internationally and get bitten.
 

ckmpd

Alfrescian
Loyal
A taste of its own medicine for a group that like to bring people, including teenagers who criticise them to court.

They are used to getting their ways locally, but try to do the same internationally and get bitten.

I hope this saga teaches the pap a lesson
 

Bigfuck

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I hope this saga teaches the pap a lesson

Hague for SCS was a joke because it was fake Hague. You go by English and Commonwealth law, guarantee sure violations legally can be found and valid. Last time never kenna does not mean correct. Bring that up penalty go up one level. Better dun play play. Go by pure law, we likely die cock standing. Do not hope for geopolitical intervention to change the ruling. You talk too much cock, all Singapore originating manifests will kenna double check. Can wan and it is legal and not wrong.
 

Reddog

Alfrescian
Loyal
China is smart that they did not involve their communist legal system to challenge Singapore. Instead, they used the English based Hong Kong legal framework......

Hong Kong's Courts and Legal System is World class.

Does Singapore have a strong case at all?

Terrex, not in cargo manifest, does not legally exist. Case close.
 
Top