• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Edmund Kwok NKF Had Multiple Sex Partners with his Male and Female Nurses in NKF

Wunderfool

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
A ruling elder should has more power with mandate from above than an ordinary elder. Besides NKF serving as a pool of dicks for Edmund Kwok's KKJ craving, another pool might be his church. He will not go to the openly known pool Pinkdot to keep his elderly image.

If I understand correctly,a ruling elder means he is elected by the church to serve for a period of time. There are other elders who are not elected but they are still called elders . However, they do not serve in the serving committee. Hence they are not called ruling elders. But the title of an elder once conferred is for life.
 

CoffeeAhSoh

Alfrescian
Loyal
If I understand correctly,a ruling elder means he is elected by the church to serve for a period of time. There are other elders who are not elected but they are still called elders . However, they do not serve in the serving committee. Hence they are not called ruling elders. But the title of an elder once conferred is for life.



"but the title of an elder once conferred is for life " - can please tell which verses in the Bible ???



The Qualifications of (Church ) Elders


The character and effectiveness of any church is directly related to the quality of its leadership. That’s why Scripture stresses the importance of qualified church leadership and delineates specific standards for evaluating those who would serve in that sacred position.

The qualifications for elders are found in 1 Timothy 3:2-7 and Titus 1:6-8. According to these passages, an elder must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, prudent, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not addicted to wine, not pugnacious, gentle, uncontentious, free from the love of money, not fond of sordid gain, a good manager of his household, one who has his children under control with dignity, not a new convert, one who has a good reputation outside the church, self-controlled, sensible, able to exhort in sound doctrine and to refute those who contradict, above reproach as God’s steward, not self-willed, not quick-tempered, loving what is good, just, and devout. (For an explanation of these qualifications, see pages 215-33 of The Master’s Plan for the Church by John MacArthur.)

The single, overarching qualification of which the rest are supportive is that he is to be “above reproach.” That is, he must be a leader who cannot be accused of anything sinful because he has a sustained reputation for blamelessness. An elder is to be above reproach in his marital life, his social life, his business life, and his spiritual life. In this way, he is to be a model of godliness so he can legitimately call the congregation to follow his example (Phil. 3:17). All the other qualifications, except perhaps teaching and management skills, only amplify that idea.


http://www.gty.org/resources/positions/GCCDD01/biblical-eldership
 

tanny

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: National Kidney Foundation sacks ( 16/11 ) CEO Edmund Kwok

Simi tai ji leh ???


nkf-organisation-chart-data.jpg

Is NKF chairman Koh Poh Tiong related to Koh Poh Koon.
 

Wunderfool

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
"but the title of an elder once conferred is for life " - can please tell which verses in the Bible ???



The Qualifications of (Church ) Elders


The character and effectiveness of any church is directly related to the quality of its leadership. That’s why Scripture stresses the importance of qualified church leadership and delineates specific standards for evaluating those who would serve in that sacred position.

The qualifications for elders are found in 1 Timothy 3:2-7 and Titus 1:6-8. According to these passages, an elder must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, prudent, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not addicted to wine, not pugnacious, gentle, uncontentious, free from the love of money, not fond of sordid gain, a good manager of his household, one who has his children under control with dignity, not a new convert, one who has a good reputation outside the church, self-controlled, sensible, able to exhort in sound doctrine and to refute those who contradict, above reproach as God’s steward, not self-willed, not quick-tempered, loving what is good, just, and devout. (For an explanation of these qualifications, see pages 215-33 of The Master’s Plan for the Church by John MacArthur.)

The single, overarching qualification of which the rest are supportive is that he is to be “above reproach.” That is, he must be a leader who cannot be accused of anything sinful because he has a sustained reputation for blamelessness. An elder is to be above reproach in his marital life, his social life, his business life, and his spiritual life. In this way, he is to be a model of godliness so he can legitimately call the congregation to follow his example (Phil. 3:17). All the other qualifications, except perhaps teaching and management skills, only amplify that idea.


http://www.gty.org/resources/positions/GCCDD01/biblical-eldership

Okay. Let me digress from the TS subject a bit.

When I say that the title of the elder once conferred is for life , it is with the assumption that he continues to fulfill the qualification of the elder. That is the tradition of most conservative Churches.

However, if an elder transgresses, and he refuses to confess and repent of his sins, he may come under the discipline of the church and his title may be revoked. In some cases, he may even be excommunicated.
 

numero uno

Alfrescian
Loyal
If I understand correctly,a ruling elder means he is elected by the church to serve for a period of time. There are other elders who are not elected but they are still called elders . However, they do not serve in the serving committee. Hence they are not called ruling elders. But the title of an elder once conferred is for life.

bullshit. all these self conferred grandiose soulnding titles are worse than datuks. given by insecure, inferior, lowly, useless old tikos and crap shit church. seen alot of people calling themselves elders, masters, supreme, honorable, farkers. when i see such fake titles on the name cards I usually throw them away or refused to accept them . that is the ultimate humiliation. this incident just shows they are worse than majority of us. he is just a low class sex predator abusing his power. I am sure the evidence is overwhelming and concrete proof is there in terms of video or audio recordings for the board to terminate him immediately to save themselves for embarrassment of picking a tiko crap CEO. reflects poor judgement on the board itself as this has probably been going on for a while.
 

Wunderfool

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
bullshit. all these self conferred grandiose soulnding titles are worse than datuks. given by insecure, inferior, lowly, useless old tikos and crap shit church. seen alot of people calling themselves elders, masters, supreme, honorable, farkers. when i see such fake titles on the name cards I usually throw them away or refused to accept them . that is the ultimate humiliation. this incident just shows they are worse than majority of us. he is just a low class sex predator abusing his power. I am sure the evidence is overwhelming and concrete proof is there in terms of video or audio recordings for the board to terminate him immediately to save themselves for embarrassment of picking a tiko crap CEO. reflects poor judgement on the board itself as this has probably been going on for a while.

Unquestionably, it shows that no man is infallible.
 

gongkia

Alfrescian
Loyal
It is not a moment of weakness act by EK. NKF is not the starting ground of EK's personal 'indiscretion'. The church management needs to do the rightful thing to investigate whether any 'personal indiscretion' occurred at the church ground. If anything involved under age boys whether consenting or not, it would be damn serious. Being a ruling Elder can also be in a position of abuse. They have to clear this possibility.
 
Last edited:

CoffeeAhSoh

Alfrescian
Loyal
why NKF needed to spend more than S$3M in FY 2015

on 10 Key staffs alone ???



nkf%281%291.jpg


nkf%283%293.jpg


nkf%285%295.jpg





"NKF is an Institution of Public Character (IPC). As an IPC, it can take donations from the public. People who donate to IPCs may also be eligible to receive tax deductions (i.e. if you donate money to an IPC, you may be able to pay less tax). NKF also gets funding from the government in various ways. So in all these various ways, NKF’s money comes from the public. It therefore is accountable to the public. "


http://www.unscrambled.sg/2016/11/16/mysterious-sacking-of-nkfs-ceo/






attachment.php
 

Wunderfool

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
It is not a moment of weakness act by ED. NKF is not the starting ground of ED's personal 'indiscretion'. The church management needs to do the rightful thing to investigate whether any 'personal indiscretion' occurred at the church ground. If anything involved under age boys whether consenting or not, it would be damn serious. Being a ruling Elder can also be in a position of abuse. They have to clear this possibility.

We dont' know, but you do have a point. The church should question him on that.
 

Dark Knight

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: National Kidney Foundation sacks ( 16/11 ) CEO Edmund Kwok

I guess this CEO not only is a "lau tiko" who abuse power and authority to pray on male and female staffs for sexual service but has also makan plenty of $$$.
can afford to have luxury cars and bid for nice car number plate 3248 (means do business will keep on prosper).
 

Wunderfool

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: National Kidney Foundation sacks ( 16/11 ) CEO Edmund Kwok

Anyone can guess who the victim is ?

Try elimination first.

First eliminate all the ladies. ( The victim is a male )

Second, eliminate all the direct reports to CEO. ( The victim reports the incidence to his supervisor )

Third, eliminate all those with senior position. ( The victim is in his 20s. Likely in a junior position )

Bingo ! That's the victim!
 

Brightkid

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: National Kidney Foundation sacks ( 16/11 ) CEO Edmund Kwok

If management found any misuse of public donated funds in NKF after TT's case, not necessary related to this case, do you think NKF will make any report and publicize it?

It will really stop all flow of donation from public.
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
Re: National Kidney Foundation sacks ( 16/11 ) CEO Edmund Kwok

First eliminate all the ladies. ( The victim is a male )

Second, eliminate all the direct reports to CEO. ( The victim reports the incidence to his supervisor )

Third, eliminate all those with senior position. ( The victim is in his 20s. Likely in a junior position )

Bingo ! That's the victim!

Which means he is unlikely to be in the organization chart. :biggrin:
 

Brightkid

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: National Kidney Foundation sacks ( 16/11 ) CEO Edmund Kwok

First eliminate all the ladies. ( The victim is a male )

Second, eliminate all the direct reports to CEO. ( The victim reports the incidence to his supervisor )

Third, eliminate all those with senior position. ( The victim is in his 20s. Likely in a junior position )

Bingo ! That's the victim!


There's 3 man holding just manager position leh. Only one third chance correct mah. Still cannot pin point definitately right?

Maybe can CSI their profile to check their age?
 

ginfreely

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: National Kidney Foundation sacks ( 16/11 ) CEO Edmund Kwok

Which means he is unlikely to be in the organization chart. :biggrin:

Obviously that mudlander LIAR piece of shit Wunderfool is stirring shit by talking about the organisation chart when obviously the victim is not there. Low class people who not only do not respect the victim's privacy but shamelessly stir shit to make himself feels great.
 
Top