• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Excellent Article on Bin Centre - Caught lying again

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Go to the link and see the photos of before and after. Even an ordinary contractor could have done that with the help of a junior draughtsman for design.

It does tell you that they can go to the extent of lying thru their teeth after the AGO report came out. Grace Fu and her public officials better come clean. And thank god for Google map.

The right thing to do is sue the firm.


http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2016/07/so-how-does-a-880k-bin-centre-look-like/So how does a 880k bin centre look like? 0
BY TERRY XU ON JULY 29, 2016 COMMUNITY
Just last week, Auditor-General Office stated in its report for Financial Year 2015/2016 that there had been inadequate assessment on the reasonableness of the consultancy fee of $410,000 quoted for the construction of a bin centre built by the National Arts Council (NAC) for the Victoria Theatre/Victoria Concert Hall (VT/VCH)

AGO observed that NAC had directly engaged the VT/VCH consultants to provide additional consultancy services amounting to $410,000 for the construction of a bin centre, without first conducting a cost assessment to ascertain the reasonableness of the fee quoted.

AGO wrote that the fee was exceptionally high at 87.2 per cent of the construction cost, $470,000 and that there was no assurance that the fee paid by NAC was reasonable.

The $410,000 consultation fees on top of the $470,000 construction fees, means that the bin centre costs in total, a whopping $880,000.

So what bin centre is it that cost nearly to one million dollars?

Given that the AGO identified the bin centre being built for VT/VCH, one would assume that the bin centre was built inside the VT/VCH.

But a look at its floorplan shows you that there is no bin centre situated inside the building.

layout

As you walk around the building, bins can be seen at a spot. But the room that the bins are placed in front of, is not the bin centre.

bins at VCH

So where is this bin centre located at? Guess what? It is located at the side of Asian Civilisation Museum. (see picture below)

IMG-20160729-WA0002
Front of bin centre
IMG-20160729-WA0005
Back of bin centre
IMG-20160729-WA0004
Side of bin centre
For better orientation, refer to the map below.

VCH bin centre

Going back to the AGO report, the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY), which oversees the NAC, said that the high consultation fee of $410,000 was down to the fact that “the construction of the bin centre for this project was more complex and required significantly more design expertise, technical consultancy services and effort to coordinate with multiple parties”.

But the AGO noted that these reasons were not cited in the approval paper for the drawdown of funds.

So looking at the photo below, which shows the bin centre in its former state and comparing it with the new one that is being built. How "complex", "more design expertise", and technical consultancy is needed to do the modifications?

bin center2
Bin centre captured by Google Maps prior to renovation.
All in all, the bin centre had the same design to match the Asian Civilisation Museum and just got upgraded to cover more area so that the bins can be hidden from sight.

The interesting thing is that the bin centre is likely not to be used only by VT/VCH but also the Asian Civilisation Museum and the Art House at Old Parliament house.

So how is the $880,000 spent on the bin centre justified?
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
2 little bird tell me market rate is only 2-5% of construction fee. definitely chop carrot.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Note that none of the state owned prostitute press from ST, TNP, Today, and highly investigative chinese press bothered to visit and ascertain if any of this adds up. It obviously an astonishing case - close to half million dollars in consultancy for dustbins store and holding area until the garbage trucks arrive. Their claim that it involved complexity is a bold faced lie. It is not even a new area that had to be incorporated in the overall refurbishment of the buildings. All they did was cover up a convenient outside area. And it is not even in the Victoria Theatre / Concert hall in the first place.

You can buy a fucking HDB Flat for that price and its consultancy work for a Bin Centre.

Its show the total lack of honesty and integrity by Grace Fu and her Ministry officials.
 
Last edited:

songsongjurong

Alfrescian
Loyal
under previous regime,such illogical awarding of contract at inflated price would be kept away from public and people outside tendering process..kelon silently..now its seemed they are very sloppy,cant be botherd to cover up he tracks,even contractor itself,dont give a hoot even if get exposed...surely,AGO personnel be taken to task sooner or later..

thats why I said, PAP morphing into UMNO...it open season since LHL take helm... money grab for all ...shitizens will foot the bill!
 

Patriot

Alfrescian
Loyal
13887106_2274857545988295_1048468123120853812_n.jpg
 
Last edited:

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
I tell you what beats all this. Philip Yeo hiring world renown architect the late Zaha Hadid to design Bioppolis with no tender, no approvals, no govt procedures followed etc. All he did was phone her to fly over and told her what he wanted. He then told her she got the gig without she having to work out the cost. He then told the then CEO of JTC to go build it.

He even gives Mugabe a hard fight.

Bro,
Nothing really beats spending S$400,000.00 rebranding Marina Bay.
 

Satyr

Alfrescian
Loyal
Go to the link and see the photos of before and after. Even an ordinary contractor could have done that with the help of a junior draughtsman for design.

It does tell you that they can go to the extent of lying thru their teeth after the AGO report came out. Grace Fu and her public officials better come clean. And thank god for Google map.

The right thing to do is sue the firm.


http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2016/07/so-how-does-a-880k-bin-centre-look-like/So how does a 880k bin centre look like? 0
BY TERRY XU ON JULY 29, 2016 COMMUNITY
Just last week, Auditor-General Office stated in its report for Financial Year 2015/2016 that there had been inadequate assessment on the reasonableness of the consultancy fee of $410,000 quoted for the construction of a bin centre built by the National Arts Council (NAC) for the Victoria Theatre/Victoria Concert Hall (VT/VCH)

AGO observed that NAC had directly engaged the VT/VCH consultants to provide additional consultancy services amounting to $410,000 for the construction of a bin centre, without first conducting a cost assessment to ascertain the reasonableness of the fee quoted.

AGO wrote that the fee was exceptionally high at 87.2 per cent of the construction cost, $470,000 and that there was no assurance that the fee paid by NAC was reasonable.

The $410,000 consultation fees on top of the $470,000 construction fees, means that the bin centre costs in total, a whopping $880,000.

So what bin centre is it that cost nearly to one million dollars?

Given that the AGO identified the bin centre being built for VT/VCH, one would assume that the bin centre was built inside the VT/VCH.

But a look at its floorplan shows you that there is no bin centre situated inside the building.

layout

As you walk around the building, bins can be seen at a spot. But the room that the bins are placed in front of, is not the bin centre.

bins at VCH

So where is this bin centre located at? Guess what? It is located at the side of Asian Civilisation Museum. (see picture below)

IMG-20160729-WA0002
Front of bin centre
IMG-20160729-WA0005
Back of bin centre
IMG-20160729-WA0004
Side of bin centre
For better orientation, refer to the map below.

VCH bin centre

Going back to the AGO report, the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY), which oversees the NAC, said that the high consultation fee of $410,000 was down to the fact that “the construction of the bin centre for this project was more complex and required significantly more design expertise, technical consultancy services and effort to coordinate with multiple parties”.

But the AGO noted that these reasons were not cited in the approval paper for the drawdown of funds.

So looking at the photo below, which shows the bin centre in its former state and comparing it with the new one that is being built. How "complex", "more design expertise", and technical consultancy is needed to do the modifications?

bin center2
Bin centre captured by Google Maps prior to renovation.
All in all, the bin centre had the same design to match the Asian Civilisation Museum and just got upgraded to cover more area so that the bins can be hidden from sight.

The interesting thing is that the bin centre is likely not to be used only by VT/VCH but also the Asian Civilisation Museum and the Art House at Old Parliament house.

So how is the $880,000 spent on the bin centre justified?

There are numerous signs that this administration does not care about the people, only themselves. Whatever LKY was, you had no doubt he cared about the people, tough love or not.
Until of course his first-born enters the picture. Then it becomes more complex. Does the monarch serve the people or the people , the monarch ?
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Because A*star is a stat board, they are obliged to show their annual financials to Parliament. These financials are the essentially the operating admin financials. The actual pot of money is the research funds which amounts to over a billion a year and this is managed by A*Star as an "agent". Their disbursement of the research funds are not revealed to Parliament. BMRC gets its largesse from the research fund.

Wait, Biopolis isn't really a government subsidiary, is it? The funding is from BMRC if I understand correctly, another mysterious black hole, if you may.
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
BMRC gets its largesse from the research fund.

Ahh... That explains the black hole portion. Oh wait, are those institutions sitting there on a lease? The institutes don't own the buildings if I understand correctly... Fuck! The Phailip is truly phallic through and through!
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Let me remind everyone once again that all this does not matter. 70% will still vote for the PAP as long as they feel there's something in it for themselves.
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Let me remind everyone once again that all this does not matter. 70% will still vote for the PAP as long as they feel there's something in it for themselves.

The 70% are 'tar rabbits' embracer, once embraced, it is all for one, one for all; that's the something for themselves. Well, the 70% got something this month..& surprises!, surprises!....they got it early on July 28th..just in time to spend on August 3....:biggrin:

There is always something for everybody...just embrace the 'tea rabbit'....:rolleyes:
 
Top