• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawrence

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
No coffins no deals, Xijinping got to do it! Minimum 2000 US deathtoll for a start. Missiles barrage on 7th fleet ASAP!


http://news.sina.cn/gn/2016-05-10/detail-ifxryhhi8611184.d.html?vt=4&pos=108




中国出动军舰军机对美军舰驱离
2016-05-10 20:20 国防部网站 40456 收藏

解放军出动3架军机3艘军舰驱离美军舰
  原标题:国防部新闻发言人杨宇军就美国军舰进入中国南沙群岛有关岛礁邻近海域发表谈话   

  5月10日,美国海军“劳伦斯”号驱逐舰未经中国政府允许,非法进入中国南沙群岛有关岛礁邻近海域。中国军队当即采取应对行动,海军航空兵2架歼-11战斗机、1架运-8警戒机紧急升空,赴相关海域巡逻警戒,“广州”号导弹驱逐舰、“绵阳”号导弹护卫舰和“临汾”号护卫舰迅即对美军舰进行识别查证,并予以警告驱离。

  美军舰机未经允许非法进入中国南沙岛礁邻近海域是严重的挑衅行为,中方此前已多次指出其危害性,并予以严正警告。但美方一意孤行,再次派军舰进入挑衅。我们不禁要问,美方究竟要在推动南海军事化的道路上走多远?究竟要在破坏南海和平稳定的道路上走多远?

  美军舰机的挑衅活动,暴露了美方妄图搞乱地区局势,从中渔利的用心,再次证明了中方在南沙有关岛礁进行防御设施的建设完全合理,很有必要。

  需要指出的是,美军舰机进入南沙岛礁邻近海域改变不了中国对南沙群岛及其附近海域拥有主权的事实,美军的挑衅行动是徒劳无益的。中方将根据需要加大海空巡逻力度,加强各项防卫能力建设,坚定捍卫国家主权和安全,坚决维护南海和平稳定。




http://edition.cnn.com/2016/05/10/politics/us-china-destroyer-sails-by-disputed-island/


U.S. destroyer sails near disputed Chinese island
By Brad Lendon and Jim Sciutto, CNN

Updated 1648 GMT (0048 HKT) May 10, 2016


Taiwan: China deploys missiles to contested island

Obama: Steps needed to relieve tension in South China Sea

South China Sea territorial dispute

China triggers regional anger with test flight

China warns U.S. to stop transits in South China Sea

Tensions grow in the South China Sea

China says it warned, tracked U.S. warship
Now Playing
Tensions growing in South China Sea dispute

Power struggle over island in South China Sea

Taiwan President on China, disputed islands

Pics seem to show radar installation in South China Sea

Reports: China deployed missles to disputed island

Aerospace technology to monitor South China Sea

Taiwan: China deploys missiles to contested island

Obama: Steps needed to relieve tension in South China Sea

South China Sea territorial dispute

China triggers regional anger with test flight

China warns U.S. to stop transits in South China Sea

Tensions grow in the South China Sea

China says it warned, tracked U.S. warship

Tensions growing in South China Sea dispute

Power struggle over island in South China Sea

Taiwan President on China, disputed islands

Pics seem to show radar installation in South China Sea

Reports: China deployed missles to disputed island

Aerospace technology to monitor South China Sea

Taiwan: China deploys missiles to contested island
Story highlights
U.S. warship was exercising right of "innocent passage," the Pentagon says
Three Chinese planes and three Chinese ships were dispatched to the area
China says the U.S. move justifies Beijing building military facilities on disputed islands
(CNN)The U.S. Navy on Tuesday sent a guided missile destroyer within 12 miles of a disputed island in the South China Sea where China has built an airstrip -- prompting China to scramble fighter jets and dispatch warships to "expel" the American ship.

"USS William P. Lawrence exercised the right of innocent passage while transiting inside 12 nautical miles of Fiery Cross Reef, a high-tide feature that is occupied by China, but also claimed by the Philippines, Taiwan, and Vietnam," a Pentagon statement said.
"This operation challenged attempts by China, Taiwan, and Vietnam to restrict navigation rights around the features they claim ... contrary to international law," the statement continued.
Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 12 nautical miles is considered the limit at which a nation's rule extends off its shores.
The Law of the Sea defines "innocent passage" as a transit in which a ship does not conduct any military, commercial or research activities.
 

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

Beijing must prepare own deathtoll budget 50~100 million to write the glorious history if Pacific. Including blanket settlement with Japs and unify Taiwan, help to unify Koreas, the Pacifics, and most importantly the superpower status settlement with USA, give USA the same amount of deathtoll, and essentially civilian deathtoll.

Then the whole big picture will become clear and brilliant.
 

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

同志们!当文明大国没啥实际屌用!当威武野蛮大国算了!
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

Usn will say thank u for sinking it n confiscate all china properties in usa, freeze bank accts n default on bonds.
 

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

Usn will say thank u for sinking it n confiscate all china properties in usa, freeze bank accts n default on bonds.

Very NEGLIGIBLE COST to write off without any second thoughts. The TREMENDOUS PROFIT from eliminating the USA and takeover domination of resources on almost entire globe will WELL JUSTIFY.

Can takeover entire territory of USA, auction all their citizens online as slaves e.g. Alibaba.com 淘宝 etc.
 

greedy and cunning

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

"USS William P. Lawrence exercised the right of innocent passage while transiting inside 12 nautical miles of Fiery Cross Reef, a high-tide feature that is occupied by China, but also claimed by the Philippines, Taiwan, and Vietnam," a Pentagon statement said.
"This operation challenged attempts by China, Taiwan, and Vietnam to restrict navigation rights around the features they claim ... contrary to international law," the statement continued.
Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 12 nautical miles is considered the limit at which a nation's rule extends off its shores.
The Law of the Sea defines "innocent passage" as a transit in which a ship does not conduct any military, commercial or research activities.

no worry
china will seek the service of a former chief just-tease
who is an expert in interpreting meaning of ' within a circle '
sure he could make 12 miles longer that what it is.
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

before Xi jinping, the nazi war monger, japan was a pacifist nation. Now they are arming themselves and their allies in south east asia. who started their arms race by blatantly sailing and flying into japanese territory, and now vietnamese, philippines and malaysian territories.
I am not worried about malaysia as they are brilliant in dealing with chinese people. ONLY umno can teach the chinese how to behave.
 

greedy and cunning

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

what about british taking over fuckland island which belong to Argentina ?
what about british , american , european occupying shanghai ?
these are not some isolated , deserted islands
the original dwellers were displaced by the invading barbarians
during that time did any nations protest against these actions ?

now china want to take control of an empty island
yet some many brainless heads of counties are making noise under
the urging instigation of the evil U S Ass.
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

China stands to lose more if trouble breaks out.

Who will they copy or steal technology from:confused: Who is going to buy what they manufacture:confused: They hold vast amounts of US$ that will become useless in a conflict.

China is also alienating her weaker neighbours. Nobody likes a bully & these weaker countries will of course band together & form closer ties to countries like the US, Japan,.... & they will be more cautious when dealing with China.
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

UMNO does not need warships to tame mighty china.
malaysia-china-agree-to-settle-south-china-sea-issues-through-doc
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

Yes. They got bomo waving cocnuts that will b more than enough to ward off any hantu, enemies n saudi prince
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

Yes China must used the same gunboat diplomacy on the US, ex-colonial of British empire.

Give them a taste of their own medicine.

William Napier, a gunboat diplomat sent to China by the evil British King.

Britain first official resident posting in China. A new superintendent, William Napier, has a simple solution is to blast China into submission using gunboat diplomacy.

This dictator ranted:

"The British must use force, not meance it. There will come a time to bring upon them the chastisement of Great Britain, when every point may be gained with the greatest ease and secured for all time to come.

What a glorious thing it would be to have a blockading squadron on the Coast of the Celestial Empire. How easily a gun brigade would raise a revoution and cause them to open their port to the trading world. I should like to be the medium of such change".


http://www.amazon.com/The-Opium-War-Dreams-Making/dp/0330457470
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

UMNO has nothing or is nothing to use gunboat diplomacy on China. Their fucking useless ringgit cannot even buy 2 coconuts for their bomoh ritual.



UMNO does not need warships to tame mighty china.
malaysia-china-agree-to-settle-south-china-sea-issues-through-doc
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

those were the days British empire inflicting Chinese with illegal opium trade. Not happy with Chinese told tem to stop their illegal opium trade the bastard white trash started their War of Aggression to humiliate China.

These time China are well prepared, and wealthy nation, can make as many WMD and warplanes they wanted to. China has more than 7 metal melting furnaces (7) that can make more war weapons, navy ships and air planes to bombed USA into oblivion.

Once the Chinese pull out ALL their investments in USA, the US will collapse. China is mighty nations unlike the Japs in those days which were once a small island war shitheads going to war with their neighbours China.

Messed with China, you are dead meat.




what about british taking over fuckland island which belong to Argentina ?
what about british , american , european occupying shanghai ?
these are not some isolated , deserted islands
the original dwellers were displaced by the invading barbarians
during that time did any nations protest against these actions ?

now china want to take control of an empty island
yet some many brainless heads of counties are making noise under
the urging instigation of the evil U S Ass.
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

these days are technology economy and even weaker countries (big or small) are on Chinese to manufacture cheap products for them to get their economy going.

Look at Western countries, for example Australia, All angmoh construction companies are relying on cheap Chinese construction equipment and building materials to build a building. Angmoh only supply labour works and are themselves cheap labours.

No Chinese products no work for the angmohs. How else?

No Chinese cheap materials and equipment angmohs construction industries will collapse.

Who will angmoh support, China or USA this time?

US is nothing and has nothing to show their muscles these days. No Chinese cheap products no economy for USA.









China stands to lose more if trouble breaks out.

Who will they copy or steal technology from:confused: Who is going to buy what they manufacture:confused: They hold vast amounts of US$ that will become useless in a conflict.

China is also alienating her weaker neighbours. Nobody likes a bully & these weaker countries will of course band together & form closer ties to countries like the US, Japan,.... & they will be more cautious when dealing with China.
 

Agoraphobic

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

I think it should be - NO USA, NO WORLD!!!

Look at global economics - American Express, VISA card, these are Yankee stuff yah? Any product from anywhere (or country) in the world able to match - Coca Cola? Marlboro? Microsoft? China is an emerging country, a lot of progress in the last half century, but still has a long way to catch up with many countries in the world. China has a lot of potential, that's all! Can China come up with a company as creative as Walt Disney? Or let's say, Hershey Chocolate? Cheapness sells, ONLY to cheapskates. Those who can afford quality don't buy something because it is cheap, but because it is good, and prestigious. In this, lots of rich and well-to-do Chinese would rather pay good money for an Apple iPhone/computer that any other brand, no matter how patriotic they can be.

Cheers!

....................... No Chinese cheap products no economy for USA.
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

these days are technology economy and even weaker countries (big or small) are on Chinese to manufacture cheap products for them to get their economy going.

Look at Western countries, for example Australia, All angmoh construction companies are relying on cheap Chinese construction equipment and building materials to build a building. Angmoh only supply labour works and are themselves cheap labours.

No Chinese products no work for the angmohs. How else?

No Chinese cheap materials and equipment angmohs construction industries will collapse.

Who will angmoh support, China or USA this time?

US is nothing and has nothing to show their muscles these days. No Chinese cheap products no economy for USA.

Don't forget that the they used to make everything in other parts of the world when China was a closed communist country. These countries moved their production into China so that they could make more $$$.

They can easily shift production back to these countries e.g. Batam, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia,..... if the conditions in China are not optimal. In fact some companies are already doing this because labor in China is becoming expensive.
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

the Chinese had also tried to move to Vietnam, Batam and Malaysia before but the attitude and manpower resource in those countries failed.

Technology manufacturing required many small supporting engineering firms and those countries you mentioned do not have that kind of engineering to support full scale production. Cheap labours can only goes this far. China has many small engineering firms to support full scale production from design to raw materials to end products.

This is why you see Apple still need Chinese to make for them.

The Westerners lack the kind of small engineering firms to support 10 containers orders per month production, full scale for example. Bro from design to raw material to packaging in large scale support and can only find in a country with over 1 billion people able to take the full scale volume.







Don't forget that the they used to make everything in other parts of the world when China was a closed communist country. These countries moved their production into China so that they could make more $$$.

They can easily shift production back to these countries e.g. Batam, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia,..... if the conditions in China are not optimal. In fact some companies are already doing this because labor in China is becoming expensive.
 
Last edited:

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

Chines are catching up and catching up to new world technology which the USA are lacking today.

USA American express and coca cola are history, so was Kodak, GM and FORD.

Chinese are leading in technology and make the first human rideable drone 184.

http://time.com/4171329/drone-helicopter-ehang-184-ces/


China Chinese are rich and wealthy today, work hard and not into drug trafficker like the British empire to make drug money. China has own huge domestic market for new tech products. Product testing is no problem to the rich Chinese.









I think it should be - NO USA, NO WORLD!!!

Look at global economics - American Express, VISA card, these are Yankee stuff yah? Any product from anywhere (or country) in the world able to match - Coca Cola? Marlboro? Microsoft? China is an emerging country, a lot of progress in the last half century, but still has a long way to catch up with many countries in the world. China has a lot of potential, that's all! Can China come up with a company as creative as Walt Disney? Or let's say, Hershey Chocolate? Cheapness sells, ONLY to cheapskates. Those who can afford quality don't buy something because it is cheap, but because it is good, and prestigious. In this, lots of rich and well-to-do Chinese would rather pay good money for an Apple iPhone/computer that any other brand, no matter how patriotic they can be.

Cheers!
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: BRAVO! Pacific War in a matter of time PLA war planes war ships expelled USS Lawr

the Chinese had also tried to move to Vietnam, Batam and Malaysia before but the attitude and manpower resource in those countries failed.

Technology manufacturing required many small supporting engineering firms and those countries you mentioned do not have that kind of engineering to support full scale production. Cheap labours can only goes this far. China has many small engineering firms to support full scale production from design to raw materials to end products.

This is why you see Apple still need Chinese to make for them.

The Westerners lack the kind of small engineering firms to support 10 containers orders per month production, full scale for example. Bro from design to raw material to packaging in large scale support and can only find in a country with over 1 billion people able to take the full scale volume.

Yes there is plenty of parts that go into an iPhone. Many of these parts are from Korean, Taiwanese, Chinese companies. However if you look at the high tech parts that they are using , very little are from chinese companies. Maybe the chinese companies can do simpler tasks like making the stainless steel cases for the iPhone. earphones, chargers,..etc

Apple is using China mainly for it's cheap labour. The contractor that they use is Foxconn, a Taiwanse company.

For high tech parts like processors, Apple designs the AX series of processors & has companies like Samsung(Korean) and TSMC(Taiwan) manufacture these processors.
They are using optics from companies like Sony. That is why when Japan had an earthquake there were fears of production problems for the iPhone.
 
Top