• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Mandarin Gardens Back to Mandarin Gardens

ckmpd

Alfrescian
Loyal
It's called Nehville Park now. And the swimming pool have been nicknamed the Ganges River. All you Indian lovers are invited to take a dip and take a sip from the pool......LOL......LOL

There was once an indian lady who swam in the MG pool in her home clothes. She was told off by a resident. her false modesty offends our hygiene. if she wants to be modest, she shd swim in her bathtub and not contaminate the swimming pool with her home clothes. Pure lack of common courtesy and sense

that is the kind of 3rd world mentality we are facing. they dont know how to live with common space. they push their own narrow view into the common areas.

indians are very awkward and difficult people to be with.
 
Last edited:

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Turf wars are not going to help win over the foreigners. In fact it will only exacerbate what is already a tense and tenuous relation with the Indians. Rise above criticisms and engage them. Forget the us against them mentality as we all need to learn and adapt in order to coexist. FYI, this is not a uniquely Singaporean issue. Happens in every country that has taken in horde of foreign migrants.

Perhaps you could consider some form of 'limited representation' and over time seek ways to bridge the needs of the two communities. IMHO, it simply makes no sense to isolate them.You certainly have the means and tools via AGMs, EGMs, resolutions, etc to change. The question is whether the residents of Mandarin Garden on both sides of the divide have the will to change the status quo.

Hello, the Ah Nehs don't belong here. The PAP invited them in against the wishes of the people. We don't want them here ...get them out. If we have to scare them off, we will. Are you going to defend them?
 

SarahPeiLing

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Turf wars are not going to help win over the foreigners. In fact it will only exacerbate what is already a tense and tenuous relation with the Indians. Rise above criticisms and engage them. Forget the us against them mentality as we all need to learn and adapt in order to coexist. FYI, this is not a uniquely Singaporean issue. Happens in every country that has taken in horde of foreign migrants.

Perhaps you could consider some form of 'limited representation' and over time seek ways to bridge the needs of the two communities. IMHO, it simply makes no sense to isolate them.You certainly have the means and tools via AGMs, EGMs, resolutions, etc to change. The question is whether the residents of Mandarin Garden on both sides of the divide have the will to change the status quo.


This is the same view espoused by civil society actors like Jolovan Wham, Vincent Wijeysingha, Shelley Thio, Kirsten Han, Joshua Chiang, Rachel Zeng, various lobby groups like the LGBT and anti-death penalty group, and also by the ruling govt.

They groups - and the ruling govt - tell us that the onus is on us to adapt and change our ways. And furthermore, they go further to promote the blame culture, heaping the responsibility entirely on Singaporeans, whom they say also go abroad and use other countries as stepping stones, and who also behave badly in other country (eg, exporting our brand of kiasuism).

We have a curious situation in which both civil society, which supposed to be independent of govt influence, and the govt in power, speak hand in hand, asking born and bred citizen to change their ways to suit foreigners. And furthermore placing the blame on Singaporeans when things go wrong.

We are not xenophobic. We don't hate foreigners. We just want the onus to be on them to adapt, and not the other way round.
 

batman1

Alfrescian
Loyal
The Mandarin Gardens is a sample representative of full foreign intrusion of this small island.
The farking truth is we are already invaded by foreigners in this farking small island.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Excellent post, captures the essence of the issue. Even Alex Au is struggling on this issue. Many of these Liberals like and want to be politically correct in the eyes of similar NGOs and organisation around the World. The trust and acknowledgement of foreigners has become addictive. They struggle to articulate where the core issues that locals have with recent foreigners.

Singapore has been a cosmopolitan society from the days of Raffles. We have been colourblind long before the PAP came into power and our broad cuisine is trivial but an important indicative example. I was really sad that Alex at one stage kept banding around the word "xenophobia" and this is what the Govt has been doing.

We had Indian and Chinese coolie indentured labourers during the colonial era and now we have domestic maids from a number of countries. We also had the western expats in all our industries. It has been never ending continuum. We know our roots as our forefather were foreigners to this land. And we appreciate the new ones as they provide the labour and skills that we are lacking.

Kristen is probably the most shallow and irresponsible person that I have come across and her form of journalism has been one to pander to the NGO and the west. It has nothing to do with local needs and aspirations. As a blogger she has no idea what her responsibilities. She has on 3 separate occasions revealed things that anyone with a sense of decorum would have not revealed. She is now the darling of the establishment because they know that she has become a convenient and unexpected nexus of many of their plans and discussions.

This is the same view espoused by civil society actors like Jolovan Wham, Vincent Wijeysingha, Shelley Thio, Kirsten Han, Joshua Chiang, Rachel Zeng, various lobby groups like the LGBT and anti-death penalty group, and also by the ruling govt.

They groups - and the ruling govt - tell us that the onus is on us to adapt and change our ways. And furthermore, they go further to promote the blame culture, heaping the responsibility entirely on Singaporeans, whom they say also go abroad and use other countries as stepping stones, and who also behave badly in other country (eg, exporting our brand of kiasuism).

We have a curious situation in which both civil society, which supposed to be independent of govt influence, and the govt in power, speak hand in hand, asking born and bred citizen to change their ways to suit foreigners. And furthermore placing the blame on Singaporeans when things go wrong.

We are not xenophobic. We don't hate foreigners. We just want the onus to be on them to adapt, and not the other way round.
 
Last edited:

Debonerman

Alfrescian
Loyal
By the way what does Ting Pei Ling's baby look like. A combination of Ting's and her husband great looks the baby should probably resemble a road kill.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
I disagree that this exist in other countries where he locals have been overwhelmed like the Mandarin Gardens case when it comes to the Management Committee. Even in Middle East counties where the foreign workers including the large segment of expats of the upper income bracket outstrip the locals in numbers, everyone knows to respect the local culture and practices. No one will contemplate taking over an entire management committee in a foreign country in this manner.

It shows that we have been too kind and too accommodating. This has nothing to do with we the locals having to learn how to co-exit. Do read all of TS posts in this and the other thread. He is not advocating driving them out or isolating them. All he is asking for is to follow the rules. Why did these people from a higher income group for example playcricket in gardens in the first place. Try doing that in London, Dubai etc.

Turf wars are not going to help win over the foreigners. In fact it will only exacerbate what is already a tense and tenuous relation with the Indians. Rise above criticisms and engage them. Forget the us against them mentality as we all need to learn and adapt in order to coexist. FYI, this is not a uniquely Singaporean issue. Happens in every country that has taken in horde of foreign migrants.

Perhaps you could consider some form of 'limited representation' and over time seek ways to bridge the needs of the two communities. IMHO, it simply makes no sense to isolate them.You certainly have the means and tools via AGMs, EGMs, resolutions, etc to change. The question is whether the residents of Mandarin Garden on both sides of the divide have the will to change the status quo.
 
Last edited:

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I disagree that this exist in other countries where he locals have been overwhelmed like the Mandarin Gardens case when it comes to the Management Committee. Even in Middle East counties where the foreign workers including the large segment of expats of the upper income bracket outstrip the locals in numbers, everyone knows to respect the local culture and practices. No one will contemplate taking over an entire management committee in a foreign country in this manner.

It shows that we have been too kind and too accommodating. This has nothing to do with we the locals having to learn how to co-exit. Do read all of TS posts in this and the other thread. He is not advocating driving them out or isolating them. All he is asking for is to follow the rules. Why did these people from a higher income group for example playcricket in gardens in the first place. Try doing that in London, Dubai etc.

your PM box is full?
 

Thick Face Black Heart

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
This is the same view espoused by civil society actors like Jolovan Wham, Vincent Wijeysingha, Shelley Thio, Kirsten Han, Joshua Chiang, Rachel Zeng, various lobby groups like the LGBT and anti-death penalty group, and also by the ruling govt.

They groups - and the ruling govt - tell us that the onus is on us to adapt and change our ways. And furthermore, they go further to promote the blame culture, heaping the responsibility entirely on Singaporeans, whom they say also go abroad and use other countries as stepping stones, and who also behave badly in other country (eg, exporting our brand of kiasuism).

We have a curious situation in which both civil society, which supposed to be independent of govt influence, and the govt in power, speak hand in hand, asking born and bred citizen to change their ways to suit foreigners. And furthermore placing the blame on Singaporeans when things go wrong.

We are not xenophobic. We don't hate foreigners. We just want the onus to be on them to adapt, and not the other way round.




Absolutely agree. I couldn't have said it better. You also listed the major culprits who supposedly are anti establishment activists but somehow pander to the foreign lobby as well as the local establishment, whilst at the same time positioning themselves as bleeding heart liberals. I notice Vincent Wijey is in your list, and frankly, I'm inclined to agree he should be in your list. In other areas such as bread and butter politics, he has his heart in the right place and articulates his political stand as a true blue Singaporean. I wonder if you remember the famous anti Gilbert Goh speech V.W. made at Speaker's Corner and the flak he drew as a result. His subsequent speech was much better and obviously took the criticism into account.

It's quite sad. The people you listed are all Singaporeans. Not PRs or first generation mind you. All except the women served NS. As Scroobal said, it is eagerness to please and to be politically correct in the eyes of the foreign NGO network. They have reached a point where they are fully convinced by what they say and there is no way to tell them otherwise.
 
Last edited:

Force 136

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
If Govt has balls, they should impose Ethnic Quotas on private condos similar to HDB.

But then, this Govt is afraid of upsetting foreigners
 

gatehousethetinkertailor

Alfrescian
Loyal
I disagree that this exist in other countries where he locals have been overwhelmed like the Mandarin Gardens case when it comes to the Management Committee. Even in Middle East counties where the foreign workers including the large segment of expats of the upper income bracket outstrip the locals in numbers, everyone knows to respect the local culture and practices. No one will contemplate taking over an entire management committee in a foreign country in this manner.

It shows that we have been too kind and too accommodating. This has nothing to do with we the locals having to learn how to co-exit. Do read all of TS posts in this and the other thread. He is not advocating driving them out or isolating them. All he is asking for is to follow the rules. Why did these people from a higher income group for example playcricket in gardens in the first place. Try doing that in London, Dubai etc.

I've said it before and I am still convinced that the issue is the meekness of the locals - this is not about being a paikiah and whacking indiscriminately to show you have strength - it is really about calling their bluff with conviction and being willing to articulate it directly - this meekness if what let's them easily believe that Singaporeans (in general the majority) are a peculiar lot who are happy to jabber away in Mandarin, disappear for lunch at 1130, want to learn Korean instead of gaining confidence in their basic English diction and the list grows from there.

I don't buy the whole "caste" and "North Indian" rationalisation - India is not just a country it's a sub-continent with a billion people - not all those who are here are necessarily from "north India" - it's the general ignorance and lack of interest in Worldly affairs, geography, world politics etc that also adds to their view of the locals as being simpletons - it's a harsh reality that after 50 years we have been groomed into a subservient nation of automatons who are generally very polite, friendly and nice yet passive aggressive against those who pick on us.

And the obvious "Asian values" about respecting authority etc adds to this sense of conformity....so unless you are willing to call their bluff or speak down to them in the same manner they do to you, small victories like Mandarin gardens are sentimental at best and not representative of any turning tide.

In the Gulf countries, if they are out of line with any locals they can get their work permits cancelled and banned from working there again for a set period of time. They are rarely given PR or residency status and they know the score when dealing with the locals so they won't try as when they arrived their peers will warn them off.

If any of you have the confidence of any of these chaps you should ask what they think, what they are told and what they are led to believe about the locals by their peers when they first arrive. You will be shocked.

I also hold SINDA and Vasanthaam responsible for misrepresenting Tamils, their culture, food and languageas as the only type of Indians known to Singaporeans to the extent that the new Indians whom generally converse in Hindi easily despite their diverse ethnic background are a shock to the system.

As long as they can jump jobs easily (because their networks and willingness to help one another is well established), live in Condos, have management roles, earn three times what Singkies earn and can get PR and Citizenship easily, have a government in power that blames locals for being not as smart or entrepreneurial or brazen in taking chances, then there is absolutely no need or desire for them to "integrate".

If you know any British Asians (ie 2nd/3rd generation Indians or Pakistanis or Bangladeshis) from the UK working in Singapore they will tell you that they do not have anything in common with these Indians either. And they hate the fact that when the taxi uncles pick them up they are asked whether they are from India. These guys are just like Singkies who have very little in common culturally with their Motherlands anymore - and they dislike their lack of manners and civility just as much - as a result they are much more comfortable hanging out with other British expats and socialise much better with local Singkies because the baseline of etiquette and manners for civilised behaviour is much more similar.

Now only if Singkies could stop looking at each other in CMIO categories with the corresponding prejudices and realise than these Indian expats see anyone who is Singaporean as just another singkie to tekan and makan regardless of which category of CMIO they may be. As long as we continue battling and belittling each other based on race we are just easy fodder for any third world immigrant as we are so divided amongst ourselves.
 
Last edited:

JHolmesJr

Alfrescian
Loyal
I've said it before and I am still convinced that the issue is the meekness of the locals - this is not about being a paikiah and whacking indiscriminately to show you have strength - it is really about calling their bluff with conviction and being willing to articulate it directly - this meekness if what let's them easily believe that Singaporeans (in general the majority) are a peculiar lot who are happy to jabber away in Mandarin, disappear for lunch at 1130, want to learn Korean instead of gaining confidence in their basic English diction and the list grows from there.

I don't buy the whole "caste" and "North Indian" rationalisation - India is not just a country it's a sub-continent with a billion people - not all those who are here are necessarily from "north India" - it's the general ignorance and lack of interest in Worldly affairs, geography, world politics etc that also adds to their view of the locals as being simpletons - it's a harsh reality that after 50 years we have been groomed into a subservient nation of automatons who are generally very polite, friendly and nice yet passive aggressive against those who pick on us.

And the obvious "Asian values" about respecting authority etc adds to this sense of conformity....so unless you are willing to call their bluff or speak down to them in the same manner they do to you, small victories like Mandarin gardens are sentimental at best and not representative of any turning tide.

In the Gulf countries, if they are out of line with any locals they can get their work permits cancelled and banned from working there again for a set period of time. They are rarely given PR or residency status and they know the score when dealing with the locals so they won't try as when they arrived their peers will warn them off.

If any of you have the confidence of any of these chaps you should ask what they think, what they are told and what they are led to believe about the locals by their peers when they first arrive. You will be shocked.

I also hold SINDA and Vasanthaam responsible for misrepresenting Tamils, their culture, food and languageas as the only type of Indians known to Singaporeans to the extent that the new Indians whom generally converse in Hindi easily despite their diverse ethnic background are a shock to the system.

As long as they can jump jobs easily (because their networks and willingness to help one another is well established), live in Condos, have management roles, earn three times what Singkies earn and can get PR and Citizenship easily, have a government in power that blames locals for being not as smart or entrepreneurial or brazen in taking chances, then there is absolutely no need or desire for them to "integrate".

If you know any British Asians (ie 2nd/3rd generation Indians or Pakistanis or Bangladeshis) from the UK working in Singapore they will tell you that they do not have anything in common with these Indians either. And they hate the fact that when the taxi uncles pick them up they are asked whether they are from India. These guys are just like Singkies who have very little in common culturally with their Motherlands anymore - and they dislike their lack of manners and civility just as much - as a result they are much more comfortable hanging out with other British expats and socialise much better with local Singkies because the baseline of etiquette and manners for civilised behaviour is much more similar.

Now only if Singkies could stop looking at each other in CMIO categories with the corresponding prejudices and realise than these Indian expats see anyone who is Singaporean as just another singkie to tekan and makan regardless of which category of CMIO they may be. As long as we continue battling and belittling each other based on race we are just easy fodder for any third world immigrant as we are so divided amongst ourselves.

Gold medal for rambling.

Bottom line is: the cunts who make and sign off the policies have let in too many of them….numbers need to be reduced by 2/3 to make things right again.
 
Top