Whose Engrish more powderful? Founding Daughter's or Buy-High-Sell-Low's?

dr.wailing

Alfrescian

Loyal

• Apr 17, 2016

• #1

We all know the standard of Founding Daughter's Engrish, based on the feedback of I. Fernandez, an associate editor of The Straits Times.

We've also seen the proficiency level of written Engrish by Buy-High-Sell-Low when she "apologized" for posting a picture of a monkey showing its middle finger.

Whose Engrish is more power - Founding Daughter's or Buy-High-Sell-Low's?

 

mojito

Alfrescian

Loyal

• Apr 17, 2016

• #2

Brevity is the soul of wit, my friend.

 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)

Asset

• Apr 17, 2016

• #3

mojito said:

Brevity is the soul of wit, my friend.

Click to expand...

yes, agree. there's no brevity that can cum close like a single-digit finger gesture.

 

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)

Asset

• Apr 17, 2016

• #4

The other daughter-in-law's engrish is most powderfuls

 

red amoeba

Alfrescian (Inf)

Asset

• Apr 17, 2016

• #5

For that I tend to agree with LKY - the essence is to be able to communicate your meaning n intention well in the simplest words possible. We r not writing poetry or literature. For writing for columns it ought to be readable n understandable by the masses. For that I think LWL is better than HC.

 

S

Satyr

Alfrescian

Loyal

• Apr 17, 2016

• #6

Anybody who thinks " timidness" is a real word definitely needs an editor.

 

HTOLAS

Alfrescian (Inf)

Asset

• Apr 17, 2016

• #7

The HO is a graphic communicator: