-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Boo Hoo! Its always Cheena fault!!
- Thread starter harimau
- Start date
Just ask the 1.2BIL PRC to pangsai into South China Sea can fill up the ocean liao!
halo ah neh lim sai chwee chang sai chwee jin song si boh
Last edited:
halo sai lang jiak sai and lim sai chwee si ok eh lah
These cheena go sll over south east asia ilegally, then decided to stay, then try to stop hard working banglas from coming in.
China is doing what she should have been doing during the Ming Dynasty. No one could have said anything then. There was no internet, or UN even! Now, every individual has an opinion, animal rights and eco-consciousness governs much of how we think, and the internet has invaded our lives!
Cheers!
Cheers!
di coolie dem love nyam shit water and bathe in shit water yu pussyhole.
yes, as if, even they drug trafficker opium at China door step they have rights to say Chinese physical constitution require drug opium and the bastard British Empire angmoh are providing humanitarian services to the Chinese.
Born and Bred to the Opium Pipe
Westerners had long held the vast, ancient kingdom of Cathay in awe, but by the end of the Opium Wars, Chinese were beneath contempt, mere creatures born and bred to the opium pipe. It is ever thus, for gross atrocities, whether in China or Auschwitz or South Africa or Nicaragua or the antebellum South, can be sustained only by dehumanizing our prey and by canonizing ourselves. Britain argued that not only did the Chinese want opium but that their physical constitution required it, and that the British opium monopolies throughout Asia were a humanitarian service for the Chinese.
http://www.amoymagic.com/OpiumWar.htm
Born and Bred to the Opium Pipe
Westerners had long held the vast, ancient kingdom of Cathay in awe, but by the end of the Opium Wars, Chinese were beneath contempt, mere creatures born and bred to the opium pipe. It is ever thus, for gross atrocities, whether in China or Auschwitz or South Africa or Nicaragua or the antebellum South, can be sustained only by dehumanizing our prey and by canonizing ourselves. Britain argued that not only did the Chinese want opium but that their physical constitution required it, and that the British opium monopolies throughout Asia were a humanitarian service for the Chinese.
http://www.amoymagic.com/OpiumWar.htm
You happy now? Drugs are flowing into UK!!
Airport sniffer dogs find 'cheese and sausages' but no Class A drugs
14 April 2016
From the section UK
Media captionSniffer dogs at Manchester Airport are finding "cheese and sausages" says a report
The use of sniffer dogs at Manchester Airport has been criticised after dogs there failed to discover any Class A drugs in a seven-month period.
But one dog, trained to detect illegal animal products, often found "small amounts of cheese or sausages" carried by holidaymakers, a report said.
The review, by the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration, assessed border checks at the airport.
The Home Office, which oversees border checks, said improvements must be made.
Some recommendations had already been implemented, it added.
The report examined how "efficiently and effectively" Border Force - which is managed by the Home Office - operated at Manchester Airport.
The airport, the UK's third largest, has six detector dogs and new kennels, which cost £1.25m.
Cheese and sausagesImage copyrightThinkstock
Image caption
One dog made "accurate detections" - but most were of cheese or sausages
Inspectors said that although heroin and cocaine were assessed as "very high priority" for the search team, no Class A drugs had been found by the dogs between November 2014 and June 2015.
As a result, the report concluded that "Class A drugs detections were not at the level that might be expected", and said Border Force should review "how particular flights were risk assessed" and where staff and dogs were deployed.
The amount of goods seized by dog units represented a "low return on investment", the report added.
'Lack of innovation'
One dog, which had been trained to sniff out smuggled animal products, had detected many items accurately - but the report said most were "small amounts of cheese or sausages, wrongly brought back by returning British holidaymakers and posing minimal risk to UK public health".
This "accurate detection" meant the dog found animal products. It was then up to its handler to decide whether any action should be taken.
Travellers arriving in the UK from EU countries can bring fresh food including meat and dairy products, but there are strict rules about food brought from non-EU countries - including a ban on all meat, dairy and potatoes.
Inspectors said it would be of "more strategic value" to target flights where the dog might find bush-meat - which could pose a considerable threat to public health.
"A senior manager agreed that there was a lack of innovation in the use of the dogs, and told us that a new management structure was being put into place to take a fresh look at their deployment," the report said.
Over the period however, the dogs had helped in the seizure of more than 46,000 cigarettes, 60kg of tobacco, 181kg of illegal meat and £28,000 cash, the report said.
Media captionSniffer dog Eric sniffs out sports presenter Rob Bonnet
Other elements of border checks were also reviewed, with the report finding that:
A "significant number" of Border Force staff at the airport were not fully trained in immigration work, leading to "delays and inefficiencies in the processing of passengers".
Some staff were called upon to supervise immigration functions at a terminal for a shift "without the relevant immigration knowledge or training".
There was a "control breach" in April 2015 when passengers from a delayed flight were "misdirected through an unmanned immigration control". Managers "acted decisively" to deal with the breach.
Elsewhere, it praised Border Force's work in areas including the safeguarding of children, and said the force was "actively involved" in tackling issues such as human trafficking.
A Home Office spokesman said inspectors recognised staff at the airport were conducting "all required checks at passport control".
"However, we acknowledge that further improvements need to be made. We welcome the report's findings and accept all the recommendations - many of which, including a new recruitment and training programme, are already being implemented," the spokesman added.
A Manchester Airport spokesman said staff "work extremely closely" with Border Force and "support their work to address the issues raised in this report".
Airport sniffer dogs find 'cheese and sausages' but no Class A drugs
14 April 2016
From the section UK
Media captionSniffer dogs at Manchester Airport are finding "cheese and sausages" says a report
The use of sniffer dogs at Manchester Airport has been criticised after dogs there failed to discover any Class A drugs in a seven-month period.
But one dog, trained to detect illegal animal products, often found "small amounts of cheese or sausages" carried by holidaymakers, a report said.
The review, by the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration, assessed border checks at the airport.
The Home Office, which oversees border checks, said improvements must be made.
Some recommendations had already been implemented, it added.
The report examined how "efficiently and effectively" Border Force - which is managed by the Home Office - operated at Manchester Airport.
The airport, the UK's third largest, has six detector dogs and new kennels, which cost £1.25m.
Cheese and sausagesImage copyrightThinkstock
Image caption
One dog made "accurate detections" - but most were of cheese or sausages
Inspectors said that although heroin and cocaine were assessed as "very high priority" for the search team, no Class A drugs had been found by the dogs between November 2014 and June 2015.
As a result, the report concluded that "Class A drugs detections were not at the level that might be expected", and said Border Force should review "how particular flights were risk assessed" and where staff and dogs were deployed.
The amount of goods seized by dog units represented a "low return on investment", the report added.
'Lack of innovation'
One dog, which had been trained to sniff out smuggled animal products, had detected many items accurately - but the report said most were "small amounts of cheese or sausages, wrongly brought back by returning British holidaymakers and posing minimal risk to UK public health".
This "accurate detection" meant the dog found animal products. It was then up to its handler to decide whether any action should be taken.
Travellers arriving in the UK from EU countries can bring fresh food including meat and dairy products, but there are strict rules about food brought from non-EU countries - including a ban on all meat, dairy and potatoes.
Inspectors said it would be of "more strategic value" to target flights where the dog might find bush-meat - which could pose a considerable threat to public health.
"A senior manager agreed that there was a lack of innovation in the use of the dogs, and told us that a new management structure was being put into place to take a fresh look at their deployment," the report said.
Over the period however, the dogs had helped in the seizure of more than 46,000 cigarettes, 60kg of tobacco, 181kg of illegal meat and £28,000 cash, the report said.
Media captionSniffer dog Eric sniffs out sports presenter Rob Bonnet
Other elements of border checks were also reviewed, with the report finding that:
A "significant number" of Border Force staff at the airport were not fully trained in immigration work, leading to "delays and inefficiencies in the processing of passengers".
Some staff were called upon to supervise immigration functions at a terminal for a shift "without the relevant immigration knowledge or training".
There was a "control breach" in April 2015 when passengers from a delayed flight were "misdirected through an unmanned immigration control". Managers "acted decisively" to deal with the breach.
Elsewhere, it praised Border Force's work in areas including the safeguarding of children, and said the force was "actively involved" in tackling issues such as human trafficking.
A Home Office spokesman said inspectors recognised staff at the airport were conducting "all required checks at passport control".
"However, we acknowledge that further improvements need to be made. We welcome the report's findings and accept all the recommendations - many of which, including a new recruitment and training programme, are already being implemented," the spokesman added.
A Manchester Airport spokesman said staff "work extremely closely" with Border Force and "support their work to address the issues raised in this report".
Similar threads
