• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Man jailed for closed up relationship with his colleagues

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
For nearly four years, a 29-year-old accountant took more than 120 upskirt photos and videos of seven women he liked, but did not think he had a chance with.

They were his friends, acquaintances and colleagues, aged 23 to 30, who had cameras secretly pointed up their skirts at places such as the church, school, foodcourts, shopping malls and even the workplace.

He organised the 122 videos and four photos on a portable hard disk, arranging them in folders according to the names of his unsuspecting victims.

But he was caught red-handed when he tried to take an upskirt video of a 23-year-old stranger going up an escalator at an MRT station in December 2013.

Yesterday, Joshua Ang Zhu Ci was given 36 weeks' jail, having pleaded guilty last October to 15 charges of insulting the modesty of a woman. Another 112 counts of the same were taken into consideration during sentencing.

Ang, who sought probation, is appealing against his sentence and is out on bail of $10,000.

The first offence he committed was in July 2010. A video of the same victim was found, dated four years later, to the day. All told, he filmed her 45 times.

Ang would use anniversaries, such as birthdays, to film an unsuspecting victim. On one occasion, in December 2012, he met a 27-year-old friend at the Starbucks outlet at Wisma Atria, bearing a birthday gift in a paper bag.

Ang placed a mobile device in the bag with its lens facing up and the camera recording, and approached his friend from behind. He then carefully positioned the bag between her legs and under her skirt.

He would film women sitting across the table from him in the office or at the foodcourts, while they shared a meal.

He also filmed them while they were going up the stairs, or getting into a lift with him.

In passing the sentence, District Judge Luke Tan said a deterrent sentence was needed as Ang had abused the trust of his friends, premeditating and planning the offences in detail.

There were multiple victims he had targeted repeatedly in various places where they would have least expected to be victims of crime. And he was able to get close to them because he knew them, the judge noted.

Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Low Chun Yee had asked for Ang to be jailed 12 weeks on charge, with four of the sentences to run consecutively, for a total of 48 weeks' jail.

But defence lawyer Quek Mong Hua argued that Ang had completed 12 sessions of psychiatric therapy, as well as 16 sessions of psychological counselling, to address his mental illness - depression, with obsessive compulsive features.

"He is practically a rehabilitated person and is unlikely to reoffend," Mr Quek said, adding that Ang, who has been unemployed for some time, also has strong support from his parents, siblings and the church.

Ang has a history of failed relationships and the victims he picked were "girls that he liked a lot, but (had) no courage to approach", the lawyer said.

Urging the judge to look at the boyish Ang in court, Mr Quek said: "He is very much like a boy in his personality."

But DPP Low said Ang had sought psychiatric treatment only because he had been arrested.

That he fancied his victims, but had no courage, was also not a mitigating factor, the DPP said.

The maximum penalty for insulting the modesty of a woman, or attempting to do so, is one year's jail and a fine.

http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/jailed-for-taking-upskirt-videos-of-his-friends


cheebye accountant, just pay $40 and street hooker will strip down for you to songsong. photo undies also song.
 

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
For nearly four years, a 29-year-old accountant took more than 120 upskirt photos and videos of seven women he liked, but did not think he had a chance with.

They were his friends, acquaintances and colleagues, aged 23 to 30, who had cameras secretly pointed up their skirts at places such as the church, school, foodcourts, shopping malls and even the workplace.

He organised the 122 videos and four photos on a portable hard disk, arranging them in folders according to the names of his unsuspecting victims.

But he was caught red-handed when he tried to take an upskirt video of a 23-year-old stranger going up an escalator at an MRT station in December 2013.

Yesterday, Joshua Ang Zhu Ci was given 36 weeks' jail, having pleaded guilty last October to 15 charges of insulting the modesty of a woman. Another 112 counts of the same were taken into consideration during sentencing.

Ang, who sought probation, is appealing against his sentence and is out on bail of $10,000.

The first offence he committed was in July 2010. A video of the same victim was found, dated four years later, to the day. All told, he filmed her 45 times.

Ang would use anniversaries, such as birthdays, to film an unsuspecting victim. On one occasion, in December 2012, he met a 27-year-old friend at the Starbucks outlet at Wisma Atria, bearing a birthday gift in a paper bag.

Ang placed a mobile device in the bag with its lens facing up and the camera recording, and approached his friend from behind. He then carefully positioned the bag between her legs and under her skirt.

He would film women sitting across the table from him in the office or at the foodcourts, while they shared a meal.

He also filmed them while they were going up the stairs, or getting into a lift with him.

In passing the sentence, District Judge Luke Tan said a deterrent sentence was needed as Ang had abused the trust of his friends, premeditating and planning the offences in detail.

There were multiple victims he had targeted repeatedly in various places where they would have least expected to be victims of crime. And he was able to get close to them because he knew them, the judge noted.

Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Low Chun Yee had asked for Ang to be jailed 12 weeks on charge, with four of the sentences to run consecutively, for a total of 48 weeks' jail.

But defence lawyer Quek Mong Hua argued that Ang had completed 12 sessions of psychiatric therapy, as well as 16 sessions of psychological counselling, to address his mental illness - depression, with obsessive compulsive features.

"He is practically a rehabilitated person and is unlikely to reoffend," Mr Quek said, adding that Ang, who has been unemployed for some time, also has strong support from his parents, siblings and the church.

Ang has a history of failed relationships and the victims he picked were "girls that he liked a lot, but (had) no courage to approach", the lawyer said.

Urging the judge to look at the boyish Ang in court, Mr Quek said: "He is very much like a boy in his personality."


Sounds like bro John Tan.
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
Do you mean this moron? :rolleyes:

attachment.php


Sounds like bro John Tan.
 

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Urging the judge to look at the boyish Ang in court, Mr Quek said: "He is very much like a boy in his personality."

No wonder the legal profession, especially criminal lawyers stink. What kind of mitigation is that? Bet Ang spent at least $5000 for an idiot to represent him in court. Hope counsel did not graduate from our world class NUS.
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
You replied to the same post twice, moron. Afraid to let your picture be the last post in the thread? :rolleyes:

No wonder the legal profession, especially criminal lawyers stink. What kind of mitigation is that? Bet Ang spent at least $5000 for an idiot to represent him in court. Hope counsel did not graduate from our world class NUS.
 

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
You replied to the same post twice, moron. Afraid to let your picture be the last post in the thread? :rolleyes:

Yes sir. You are, as always, spot on. This forum needs members like you. The more the merrier. Hope Mark didnt get to inflict further shame on your folks. Cheers.
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
Hope your folks including you and your fucked up kids don't inflict further shame on yourselves. :rolleyes:

Yes sir. You are, as always, spot on. This forum needs members like you. The more the merrier. Hope Mark didnt get to inflict further shame on your folks. Cheers.
 

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
No wonder why you suck his cock incessantly and his Kah Ch$ng is always available to his rich bosses. :wink:

Most senior and most prolific bro/contributor to this forum, RELAXXXXXXXXXXXXX lah. Member since Jul 08, 31007 super quality posts (scroobal pales in comparison), 13406 points ...... surely, you deserve to be treated better eh?
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
I do have one super quality post, which you have never been able to match, whichever moniker you use, including <scroobal>, <Debonerman>, <GoldenDragon>, <JHolmesJr>, <mojito>, <Political Dialogue>, <Madrigal Wheel>, <Charlie99>, <kohpc>, <harrych>, etc etc etc. :wink:


A long long time ago and in a land far far away
A boy started a forum for folks to have their say
It’s meant for the common man a place for all and sundry
He tried to think of a good name and finally thought of sammy

A pathetic coward from the elite wanted to say his piece
Too scared to appear in public this place to him was bliss
His chosen nick was scroobal a name now known to all
It would be fine except it didn’t say that he was missing one ball

He claimed to be a know-it-all and he would name drop daily
His behaviour as seen by most was that of a manipulative bully
Arrogance was his forte and he was not beyond deceit
If you wanted him to like you, you had better lick his feet

Disagree with him one time and he would never forget you
Tyrants like him would never allow you to have your point of view
This piece of shit would sometimes try to talk like the common man
But if you dared to go against him he would hit you with a ban

He would later lie about it and claim it was not him
It’s simply normal for this asshole to think that we are dim
He has a bunch of elite cronies who would follow him to the end
This bunch of sycophants insist on keeping their heads in the sand

Blind to the bullying and manipulation he continues with gutso
This egoistic charlatan scroobal has really reached a low
He has no self-awareness his upbringing is in question
What he needs from the rest of us is to be taught a severe lesson

He claims to be a defender of the common man but that is pure bullshit
Just mention anything about those elites and he’s chomping at the bit
His anger with the men in white may sometimes confuse us
Most likely he was discarded by them and thrown under the bus

This manipulative bully still runs the roost but this ditty is for fun
If you think of trusting him, remember he said “Khaw will not run!”
If this piece of scroobal shit does not realize he’s a bullying pest
The rest of us will simply have to think of ways to whip his fucking ass.

Most senior and most prolific bro/contributor to this forum, RELAXXXXXXXXXXXXX lah. Member since Jul 08, 31007 super quality posts (scroobal pales in comparison), 13406 points ...... surely, you deserve to be treated better eh?
 

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
Taking photos of girls at any angles in public never outraged their modesty. Taking them in private is.
If the women feel their modesty is outraged, then wear decent clothes in public. They can wear whatever they want in private.
 

ginfreely

Alfrescian
Loyal
Taking photos of girls at any angles in public never outraged their modesty. Taking them in private is.
If the women feel their modesty is outraged, then wear decent clothes in public. They can wear whatever they want in private.

If your house is on fire and the women run out wearing whatever they are wearing in private?
 
Top