New World Order - The Great Islamic Deception

Muslims and many others blame Jews and Americans and even Europe of ganging together to create a New World Order. Conspiracy theories are forwarded to prove their point. In reality, this is deception. The New World Order has been happening in front of your face for decades and you don't know it. The people behind the New World Order are Muslims and those they have bought over in Europe and USA and all over the world. Muslims are bring encouraged to infiltrate non-Muslim countries and mass produce to slowly overcome these countries. They use terror to force their way to make Sharia slowly become accepted.

Only non-Muslim countries accept Muslim immigration but Muslim countries will not accept non-Muslim immigration. This is a great tactic to increase their population in non-Muslim countries. You can see this right in Malaysia where in the 1950, the population of Malays was quite on par with Chinese and Indians. Then there was mass immigration from Indonesia followed by mass baby production and today Muslims form 70% of Malaysia who force minorities into submission. You see this all over Europe and even USA where villages, towns and cities have become Islamic due to mass immigration.


The Great Deception New World Order & Muslim Brotherhood
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjVJjBiHzOA

Then ok now we know......how to counter?
Machiam with the 70%.....it's a done deal

Narong Wongwan said:

Then ok now we know......how to counter?
Machiam with the 70%.....it's a done deal

Click to expand...

No done deal. Just spread the word about Islam as it is and not some diluted version meant to fool us into thinking Islam is a good religion. It is not even a religion since it is based firstly on conquests which includes, mass murders, rapes, slaves, looting which are all sanctioned and encouraged by quran and other Islamic scripture. Just give people the link below so they know the truth. Important to notice all mainstream media is part of this agenda since they hide the true nature of Islam and Muhammed. Nothing is based on anti-Islam or hate literature since it is entirely based on quran and other islamic scripture. Everyone can see the true barbaric nature of Islam and Muhammed for themselves.


www.thereligionofpeace.com/muhammad/myths-mu-home.htm
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
http://www.historyofjihad.org

ChaoPappyPoodle said:

Muslims and many others blame Jews and Americans and even Europe of ganging together to create a New World Order. Conspiracy theories are forwarded to prove their point. In reality, this is deception. The New World Order has been happening in front of your face for decades and you don't know it. The people behind the New World Order are Muslims and those they have bought over in Europe and USA and all over the world. Muslims are bring encouraged to infiltrate non-Muslim countries and mass produce to slowly overcome these countries. They use terror to force their way to make Sharia slowly become accepted.

Only non-Muslim countries accept Muslim immigration but Muslim countries will not accept non-Muslim immigration. This is a great tactic to increase their population in non-Muslim countries. You can see this right in Malaysia where in the 1950, the population of Malays was quite on par with Chinese and Indians. Then there was mass immigration from Indonesia followed by mass baby production and today Muslims form 70% of Malaysia who force minorities into submission. You see this all over Europe and even USA where villages, towns and cities have become Islamic due to mass immigration.

Click to expand...

Not true lah... Please back up what you said with facts and figures. You do know that your statement is self-contradictory?

garlic said:

Not true lah... Please back up what you said with facts and figures. You do know that your statement is self-contradictory?

Click to expand...

True lah. Please back up your denial with facts and figures. You must be a worshiper of Mo the pedophile, rapist, mass murderer, looter, beheader, enslaver, incestuous bastard and beheader. Cheebye, like this kind of behaviour can become prophet?

Muhammed approved of rape
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/muhammad/myths-mu-rape.htm

Muhammed and Mass Murders
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/muhammad/myths-mu-captives-kill.htm

Muhammed Killing Elderly
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/muhammad/myths-mu-elderly.htm

Muhammed Killing Children
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/muhammad/myths-mu-kill-children.htm

Muhammed Fucking his own daughter in law
http://www.answering-islam.org/Responses/Menj/zaynab.htm

ChaoPappyPoodle said:

True lah. Please back up your denial with facts and figures. You must be a worshiper of Mo the pedophile, rapist, mass murderer, looter, beheader, enslaver, incestuous bastard and beheader. Cheebye, like this kind of behaviour can become prophet?

Muhammed approved of rape
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/muhammad/myths-mu-rape.htm

Muhammed and Mass Murders
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/muhammad/myths-mu-captives-kill.htm

Muhammed Killing Elderly
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/muhammad/myths-mu-elderly.htm

Muhammed Killing Children
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/muhammad/myths-mu-kill-children.htm

Muhammed Fucking his own daughter in law
http://www.answering-islam.org/Responses/Menj/zaynab.htm

Click to expand...

Firstly, i do not see any facts and figures from you, with regards to the "New World Order", the title of your thread, just posts that expose Islam as a very flawed religion; this i agree. I am no muslim and i agree with you how a paedophile can be a prophet (+ 72 virgins :p) is really ridiculous, but you posting sites promoting islamophobia are not facts and figures. Show one definitive page that says and conclude only non-muslim countries accept muslim immigration/refugees. On one hand you said only non-muslim countries accept muslim immigration, then immediately said Malaysia accept muslim migration to skew ethnic composition (Hello..). And here are your facts and figures:

1) Turkey took in half the Syrian refugees (http://edition.cnn.com/2015/09/09/world/welcome-syrian-refugees-countries/)
2) Your rhetoric of "all over europe and U.S" is wrong as only germany, france and U.S feature in top 30 list and only Germany ranked 8 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_refugee_population)
3) For the past three decades, the top muslim immigration has been from Afghanistan and the country that receives the most are Pakistan and Iran, followed by the US and the numbers "US and all over europe" receive are significantly lesser than muslim countries. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghan_diaspora)

If you google "muslims taking over the world" or Plan for muslim world dominance, you will find many sites and videos that propagate such ideals to instill hate and i agree that Islam and Muslims number are growing, but they sure are not "taken in by only non-muslim countries" to take over the world in a "New World Order"... Nope, nada...

I rest my case.

garlic said:

Firstly, i do not see any facts and figures from you and i am no muslim and i agree with you how a paedophile can be a prophet is really ridiculous, but you posting sites promoting islamophobia are not facts and figures. Show one definitive page that says and conclude only non-muslim countries accept muslim immigration/refugees. On one hand you said only non-muslim countries accept muslim immigration, then immediately said Malaysia accept muslim migration to skew ethnic composition. And here are your facts and figures:

1) Turkey took in half the Syrian refugees (http://edition.cnn.com/2015/09/09/world/welcome-syrian-refugees-countries/)
2) Your rhetoric of "all over europe and U.S" is wrong as only germany, france and U.S feature in top 30 list and only Germany ranked 8 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_refugee_population)
3) For the past three decades, the top muslim immigration has been from Afghanistan and the country that receives the most are Pakistan and Iran, followed by the US and the numbers "US and all over europe" receive are significantly lesser than muslim countries. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghan_diaspora)

If you google "muslims taking over the world" or Plan for muslim world dominance, you will find many sites and videos that propagate such ideals to instill hate and i agree that Islam and Muslims number are growing, but they sure are not "taken in by only non-muslim countries".

I rest my case.

Click to expand...

There is no such thing as Islamophobia. Only idiots use such terms without understanding the fault in using such a term. As long as facts are based on islamic scripture and acts of Muslims then there is no such thing as Islamophobia.

Turkey take refugees is different from Europe giving them permanent shelter. Turkey like other Islamic countries provide tents and temporary shelter. Crimes against women is rampant in the refugee camps and even young girls are forced into prostitution. You compare pathetic Islamic help to their own kind with a new life, welfare systems and free education with a fucking muddy tent village put up by ISIS supporters such as Turkey. Pakistan created the Taliban and the Taliban are what created the refugees. The refugees there are going to be lifelong refugees.

You compare facts with hate when the facts are against Muslims and Islam. This is your problem and not the problem of the facts. You only want to look at facts if they make Muslims look good even when your facts are cheebye wrinkled like your face because your facts are pathetic and lies at best and deception at worse. Both very pathetic. Many sites and videos show the refugee camps that Turkey, Pakistan and other Muslim countries set up for their fellow Muslims. Only Europe and USA give the refugees a new lease of life and accept them as citizens with equal rights. You are like cheebye chap cheng Vivienne who give $5 for meals a day and say is enough. You got no standard because your standard is lies and deception and rightly this postings is about deception. Very appropriate.

ChaoPappyPoodle said:

There is no such thing as Islamophobia. Only idiots use such terms without understanding the fault in using such a term. As long as facts are based on islamic scripture and acts of Muslims then there is no such thing as Islamophobia.

Turkey take refugees is different from Europe giving them permanent shelter. Turkey like other Islamic countries provide tents and temporary shelter. Crimes against women is rampant in the refugee camps and even young girls are forced into prostitution. You compare pathetic Islamic help to their own kind with a new life, welfare systems and free education with a fucking muddy tent village put up by ISIS supporters such as Turkey. Pakistan created the Taliban and the Taliban are what created the refugees. The refugees there are going to be lifelong refugees.

You compare facts with hate when the facts are against Muslims and Islam. This is your problem and not the problem of the facts. You only want to look at facts if they make Muslims look good even when your facts are cheebye wrinkled like your face because your facts are pathetic and lies at best and deception at worse. Both very pathetic. Many sites and videos show the refugee camps that Turkey, Pakistan and other Muslim countries set up for their fellow Muslims. Only Europe and USA give the refugees a new lease of life and accept them as citizens with equal rights. You are like cheebye chap cheng Vivienne who give $5 for meals a day and say is enough. You got no standard because your standard is lies and deception and rightly this postings is about deception. Very appropriate.

Click to expand...

hahaha.....

garlic said:

Firstly, i do not see any facts and figures from you, with regards to the "New World Order", the title of your thread, just posts that expose Islam as a very flawed religion; this i agree. I am no muslim and i agree with you how a paedophile can be a prophet (+ 72 virgins :p) is really ridiculous, but you posting sites promoting islamophobia are not facts and figures. Show one definitive page that says and conclude only non-muslim countries accept muslim immigration/refugees. On one hand you said only non-muslim countries accept muslim immigration, then immediately said Malaysia accept muslim migration to skew ethnic composition (Hello..). And here are your facts and figures:

1) Turkey took in half the Syrian refugees (http://edition.cnn.com/2015/09/09/world/welcome-syrian-refugees-countries/)
2) Your rhetoric of "all over europe and U.S" is wrong as only germany, france and U.S feature in top 30 list and only Germany ranked 8 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_refugee_population)
3) For the past three decades, the top muslim immigration has been from Afghanistan and the country that receives the most are Pakistan and Iran, followed by the US and the numbers "US and all over europe" receive are significantly lesser than muslim countries. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghan_diaspora)

If you google "muslims taking over the world" or Plan for muslim world dominance, you will find many sites and videos that propagate such ideals to instill hate and i agree that Islam and Muslims number are growing, but they sure are not "taken in by only non-muslim countries" to take over the world in a "New World Order"... Nope, nada...

I rest my case.

Click to expand...

You rest what case you moron? You talk as if time stands still. Malaya brought in hundreds of thousands of Indonesians in the 1940s to skew the population. You cheebye fool. This includes Singapore where the majority of our Mats also come from Indonesia. Our Mats are not native to Singapore nor are they related to our true natives the Orang Laut. In fact Malaysia continues to allow large numbers of Muslims into Malaysia to increase their voting base against other religious groups.

Your example of Turkey is nonsense since all Turkey provides is a tent village with the minimum basic necessities being given to the refugees. Only western countries provide citizenship. Your cheebye brain and ego cannot see the difference because your dick is hard thinking like a pedophile worshiper staring at a 6 year old kid! All these wars are fought by none other than Muslims themselves as they follow Islamic scripture to war, rape, enslave and loot their way towards conquests. They behave as they always have and that is in a savage and barbaric way.

I showed proof of Islam's prophet Muhammed being a rapist, mass murderer, incestuous bastard and you only mention his pedophilia. You are worse than I thought. You pick and choose what to read and remember. You are an untrustworthy individual.

garlic said:

hahaha.....

Click to expand...

Is that the best you can do ignoramous moron? Come find out from Islamic scripture what the pervert Muhammed was like in real life. www.thereligionofpeace.com/muhammad/myths-mu-home.htm

The Muslim Brotherhood is just one spear in this Islamic NWO. The Saudis and Gulf States form another. The Muslim Brotherhood is trying to rope in Iran who has its own agenda.

Very few know of Malaysia's tight connections with the Muslim Brotherhood who has worldwide connections to terrorism as well as anything related to Islam.

Boci*urkiw also edited, and wrote an intro*duc*tion to, a puff-piece book about Mahathir Muhammed, the anti-Semitic for*mer Prime Min*is*ter of Malaysia. Another intro*duc*tory piece for the book was writ*ten by Abdul*lah Badawi who, like Mahathir, was trained by Malaysian Mus*lim Broth*er*hood lumi*nary Moham*mad M. Abdul Rauf.
http://brotherhoodunmasked.net/individuals-the-muslim-brotherhood/muhammad-m-abdul-rauf

The imam behind a proposed mosque near Ground Zero is a prominent member of a group that helped sponsor the pro-Palestinian activists who clashed violently with Israeli commandos at sea this week.
Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is a key figure in Malaysian-based Perdana Global Peace Organization, according to its Website.
Perdana is the single biggest donor ($366,000) so far to the Free Gaza Movement, a key organizer of the six-ship flotilla that tried to break Israel's blockade of the Hamas-run Gaza Strip Monday.

The Foundation’s physical home in Precinct 8, Putrajaya, was completed in October 2003. The stately building now houses the Perdana Library, an auditorium as well as a multi-purpose hall in addition to the offices of the Foundation’s Honorary President, YABhg Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, and his wife, YABhg Tun Dr. Siti Hasmah Mohd. Ali.
http://www.perdana.org.my/
http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2010/06/ground-zero-mos.html


http://www.dailynewsegypt.com/2013/05/19/muslim-brotherhood-hosts-former-malaysian-pm/

In 1981, Malaysia was described by Ismail Faruqi (i), a Palestinian-American and one of the Muslim Brotherhood’s most important leaders in North America, as the country that “Allah has blessed with a government and regime designed to serve the Muslim segment of the population….The Malaysian situation is to be studied by all Islamic government leaders for its uniqueness in post-colonial history.” (ii)

These words were contained in a letter addressed to Anwar Ibrahim urging his acceptance of an invitation from then Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad to join the ruling United Malays National Organization (UMNO). Faruqi was Anwar’s mentor, and the two were among the founding directors of the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) (a non-indicted co-conspirator in Hamas’ fundraiser Holy-Land Foundation case). Faruqi sought Anwar’s help in the implementing the Islamization of knowledge that covers all areas of study including economics.

Mahathir and UMNO worked with the MB in 1981 to tighten the collaboration with the wider Muslim world, which began with the late ’60s with Malasiya’s first prime minister, Tunku Abdul Rahma. Under the auspices of the Organization of Islamic Conference, Rahma funnelled arms and funds from Libya to the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) who were then fighting for a separate state in Mindanao, southern Philippines.

By 1981, Faruqi and others from the MB were well entrenched in Saudi Arabia working via Saudi-funded organizations such as the Muslim World League (MWL) and the World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY). No one questioned their Muslim Brotherhood affiliation.

Thirty years later there is confusion among the Malaysian leadership as to how the relationship with the MB is to be managed. The arrest and dismissal of Anwar Ibrahim as deputy prime minister and finance minister in 1998 was probably the first rift in the relationship between the Malaysian Government and the MB. MB leading lights, no less than Anwar’s good friend Yusuf Qaradawi, had publicly defended him against charges of sodomy.
http://acdemocracy.org/muslimbrotherhoodmalaysia/

Anwar Ibrahim is a good friend of the Muslim Brotherhood's spiritual leader Qadrawi who is incidentally wanted by Interpol on terrorism charges.

Born in Malaysia in August 1947, Anwar Ibrahim was heavily influenced, from an early age, by the teachings of Sayyid Qutb and Maulana Maududi, the ideological fathers of the Muslim Brotherhood. A radical Muslim student leader in the late 1960s, Ibrahim rose to considerable prominence in 1971 when he founded an organization called Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (ABIM), known in English as the Malaysian Islamic Youth Movement. Highly critical of the West, ABIM urged young Muslims to embrace Islamic fundamentalist tenets and principles as enshrined in the Quran and the Sunnah. In 1974 Ibrahim was arrested for participating in student protests against rural poverty and hunger, and he subsequently spent 20 months in a Malaysian prison.

At a 1979 ABIM meeting, Ibrahim delivered a speech outlining the direction in which he wished to lead the organization. "It is our conviction," he said, "that if all parties concerned are sincere and serious about understanding Islam, its concepts and principles, they will accept Islam as the only practicable and viable alternative to the present order." To achieve this goal, Ibrahim proposed that "chools, especially institutions of higher learning, must be encouraged to cultivate the spirit of Islamic universalism to break down the present communal barriers."

In 1981 Ibrahim co-founded the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), a Virginia-based front group of the Muslim Brotherhood. That same year, he joined the United Malays National Organization (UMNO), Malaysia's ruling political party. UMNO was led by the country's recently elected Prime Minister, Mahathir bin Mohamad, and it actively promoted Malay-Muslim rule over all other races.

At a 2005 ABIM conference in Malaysia, Dr. Ahmad Totonji -- IIIT's Vice President and a co-founder of a Saudi-financed Islamic charity with ties to the SAAR Foundation and al Qaeda -- praised Ibrahim's efforts to promote Islamic rule in his homeland: “We have changed the world. I first came to Malaysia in 1970 and was met by Br[other] Anwar.... I am glad to see sisters everywhere in Malaysia today wearing [the] hijab. We have made a better world for Muslims." Totonji further congratulated Ibrahim for his success in disguising his underlying desire to replace Malaysia's parliamentary democracy with a system based on Sharia Law: “It was wise not to involve ABIM in the political work, it was wise to keep daawah [proselytization] separate from politics.”

Returning to the political arena in time for Malaysia’s 2008 general election, Ibrahim led the Opposition Coalition to winning more parliamentary seats than ever before, though not enough to defeat the UMNO. Later that year, new charges of sodomy were brought against Ibrahim. As of September 2011, they had not yet been adjudicated.

On numerous occasions, Ibrahim has expressed anti-Israel and anti-Semitic views. A few days after the Israeli seizure of the terrorist-laden Free Gaza Movement flotilla in May 2010, for instance, he led a chanting protest mob of thousands in front of the U.S. Embassy in Kuala Lumpur. "Israelis are able to continue with their aggression because of the soft position taken by the [American] President," Ibrahim declared. Three days later, in the Malaysian parliament, he said: “Israel wouldn’t dare to attack the flotilla and set up blockades in Gaza without the support of America.”
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/printindividualProfile.asp?indid=2519

ChaoPappyPoodle said:

You rest what case you moron? You talk as if time stands still. Malaya brought in hundreds of thousands of Indonesians in the 1940s to skew the population. You cheebye fool. This includes Singapore where the majority of our Mats also come from Indonesia. Our Mats are not native to Singapore nor are they related to our true natives the Orang Laut. In fact Malaysia continues to allow large numbers of Muslims into Malaysia to increase their voting base against other religious groups.

Your example of Turkey is nonsense since all Turkey provides is a tent village with the minimum basic necessities being given to the refugees. Only western countries provide citizenship. Your cheebye brain and ego cannot see the difference because your dick is hard thinking like a pedophile worshiper staring at a 6 year old kid! All these wars are fought by none other than Muslims themselves as they follow Islamic scripture to war, rape, enslave and loot their way towards conquests. They behave as they always have and that is in a savage and barbaric way.

I showed proof of Islam's prophet Muhammed being a rapist, mass murderer, incestuous bastard and you only mention his pedophilia. You are worse than I thought. You pick and choose what to read and remember. You are an untrustworthy individual.

Click to expand...

Hullo?
You are descendants of immigrants also. you dunno meh? how come its OK for malays to accept miilions of buddhists, taoist, communists, hindus, brahmins etc but not ok for them to accept indons, bangladesh, arabs etc.

islam is not a religion. the rituals being performed by present muslims are remnants of the pagan arab religion mohamed tried to destroy. Eventually, the arabs did not understand what the message was, they wrote the holy books(printed only after the death of mohamed) and literature with the aim of tarnishing mohamed but instead, the reverse happened.what you see today are masses observing pagan arab religion mohamed tried to destroy but failed.

syed putra said:

Hullo?
You are descendants of immigrants also. you dunno meh? how come its OK for malays to accept miilions of buddhists, taoist, communists, hindus, brahmins etc but not ok for them to accept indons, bangladesh, arabs etc.

islam is not a religion. the rituals being performed by present muslims are remnants of the pagan arab religion mohamed tried to destroy. Eventually, the arabs did not understand what the message was, they wrote the holy books(printed only after the death of mohamed) and literature with the aim of tarnishing mohamed but instead, the reverse happened.what you see today are masses observing pagan arab religion mohamed tried to destroy but failed.

Click to expand...

Eh cheebye, since when you bastard Muslims accept millions of non-Muslims? You fucking cheebye lying Muslim Satanic worshiper. The very large majority of non-Muslims were in South East Asia long before you moronic monkeys were forced into slavery and prostitutes by the original Muslim conquerors that came here. You useless fuckers then converted so that you could leverage the apartheid system that islam instills as part of its agenda to conquer the world.

Cheebye, everything Muslims do especially the haj and terrorists were all done by your rapist, slave master, pedophile, incestuous, beheader, looter, kidnapper self-professed Profit Mo. Profit Mo was always a pagan worshiper. Every Muslim ritual follows Islamic scripture in quran, haddith and sunnah. Don't come here and talk cock you useless dumbfuck cheebye!

When Indonesians came to flood Malaya in the 1940s and a few decades after it was done with the intention to invade and turn the country into a Muslim-dominant country. That was the main agenda and continues to be the agenda today in Europe and Myanmar with the Rohingyas.

How the left-wing media has been playing the Islamic propaganda machine for decades. The constant cry against mainstream media by islamists are that they are being reported unfairly during terrorist attacks. The truth couldn't be further! Mainstream media has been extremely lenient and even part of the islamic propaganda machine. Did Islamists expect the mainstream media to not report such high impact news? And when they do, to not report the agenda of these terrorists or their shared ideology? If the mainstream media reported more accurately on islam, we would be seeing Muhammed portrayed more accurately using Islamic scripture where more will know of Muhammed's numerous wars, rapes, enslaving, persecutions, looting, beheadings, etc etc etc -
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm
www.thereligionofpeace.com/muhammad/myths-mu-home.htm

Mainstream media in the US and Europe have been bought over by Muslim money for decades.

Take a look at this video by Euronews which reports deliberately, wrongly how the Pope was received in Africa by Muslims -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VF-3pfXqIhg&feature=youtu.be
Pope Francis brings message of reconciliation to Central African Republic


This is what actually happened
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLWO9YnJ-cs&feature=youtu.be
Euronews spins the Papal visit to Central African Republic

ChaoPappyPoodle said:

Muslims and many others blame Jews and Americans and even Europe of ganging together to create a New World Order. Conspiracy theories are forwarded to prove their point. In reality, this is deception. The New World Order has been happening in front of your face for decades and you don't know it. The people behind the New World Order are Muslims and those they have bought over in Europe and USA and all over the world. Muslims are bring encouraged to infiltrate non-Muslim countries and mass produce to slowly overcome these countries. They use terror to force their way to make Sharia slowly become accepted.

Only non-Muslim countries accept Muslim immigration but Muslim countries will not accept non-Muslim immigration. This is a great tactic to increase their population in non-Muslim countries. You can see this right in Malaysia where in the 1950, the population of Malays was quite on par with Chinese and Indians. Then there was mass immigration from Indonesia followed by mass baby production and today Muslims form 70% of Malaysia who force minorities into submission. You see this all over Europe and even USA where villages, towns and cities have become Islamic due to mass immigration.


The Great Deception New World Order & Muslim Brotherhood
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjVJjBiHzOA

Click to expand...

don't be stupid lah................the Islamisation of Western countries is planned by the Jews...........to destroy the Western culture and national identity...............and to bring about conflict between Moose-Limps and X'tians..........

What is interesting is that Muslims killed many kiss the devil concert goers in Bataclan theatre.

Is this a coincidence or its God's will that sinners will end up with sinners?

GOD IS MY DOG said:

don't be stupid lah................the Islamisation of Western countries is planned by the Jews...........to destroy the Western culture and national identity...............and to bring about conflict between Moose-Limps and X'tians..........

Click to expand...

So you are claiming the Jews who have been commanded to be destroyed by Profit Muhammed over 1400 years ago and who quite recently have been constantly attacked by Profit Muhammed's army since the Balfour Declaration in 1917 have decided to create a New World Order ruled by Profit Muhammed's army?

You should lead Singapore's army, someday you'll very easily imagine us ruling USA, Europe and all of Asia. Your logical sense is very high. So high that almost everyone else will have to be very drunk and born stupid to have the same logical powers as you.

harimau said:

What is interesting is that Muslims killed many kiss the devil concert goers in Bataclan theatre.

Is this a coincidence or its God's will that sinners will end up with sinners?

Click to expand...

What does kiss the devil concert goers mean?

Muslims kill non-Muslims and even Muslims that do not follow Islam correctly. This is in their Satanic Quran.

Kill Muslims that do not perform conduct themselves as proper Muslims as commanded in the quran, haddith and sunnah.
Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward " This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is this Arabic word (mujahiduna) used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad, which would not make sense if it meant an internal struggle). According to the verse, Allah will allow the disabled into Paradise, but will provide a larger reward to those who are able to kill others in his cause.


Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter." This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today's terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations.


Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom." Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means 'spiritual struggle.' Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted? This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell.

Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end." The root word of "Jihad" is used again here. The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include "hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such.

Then commit these acts of Islamic love towards non-Muslims as commanded in the Satanic Quran

Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing...

but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)" (Translation is from the Noble Quran) The verse prior to this (190) refers to "fighting for the cause of Allah those who fight you" leading some to believe that the entire passage refers to a defensive war in which Muslims are defending their homes and families. The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, however, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). Verse 190 thus means to fight those who offer resistance to Allah's rule (ie. Muslim conquest). The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is disingenuous (the actual Arabic words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse). The word used instead, "fitna", can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. This is certainly what is meant in this context since the violence is explicitly commissioned "until religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.



Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."



Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not." Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.



Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."



Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority". This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').



Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward." The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. This is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers.



Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"



Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."



Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward " This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is this Arabic word (mujahiduna) used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad, which would not make sense if it meant an internal struggle).



Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..." Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?



Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"



Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them" No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.



Quran (8:15) - "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end."



Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah" Some translations interpret "fitna" as "persecution", but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for 2:193). The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj. Other Muslims were allowed to travel there - just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah", meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition. According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that "Allah must have no rivals."



Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."



Quran (8:67) - "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land..."



Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."



Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..."



Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them." According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five Pillars). This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack. Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months). The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat. Once the Muslims had power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.



Quran (9:14) - "Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people." Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even "healing" the hearts of Muslims.



Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant." The Arabic word interpreted as "striving" in this verse is the same root as "Jihad". The context is obviously holy war.



Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued." "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status. Verse 9:33 tells Muslims that Allah has charted them to make Islam "superior over all religions." This chapter was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.


Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"



Quran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place." This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.



Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew." See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them" This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians).


Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination." Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It also explains why today's devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.



Quran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper."


Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme." How does the Quran define a true believer?



Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."



Quran (17:16) - "And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction." Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is "utter destruction." (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).



Quran (18:65-81) - This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion. The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with "special knowledge" who does things which don't seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation. One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74). However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would "grieve" his parents by "disobedience and ingratitude." He was killed so that Allah could provide them a 'better' son. (Note: This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia. Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.1-2).)



Quran (21:44) - "We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?"



Quran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..." "Strive against" is Jihad - obviously not in the personal context. It's also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.



Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter." This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today's terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations.



Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost." Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad. The wounded are to be held captive for ransom. The only reason Allah doesn't do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims. Those who kill pass the test.



Quran (47:35) - "Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand") for Allah is with you,"



Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom." Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means 'spiritual struggle.' Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted? This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell.



Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves" Islam is not about treating everyone equally. This verse tells Muslims that there are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status. Also the word used for 'hard' or 'ruthless' in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as 'painful' or severe' to describe Hell in over 25 other verses including 65:10, 40:46 and 50:26..



Quran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way" Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to "battle array" meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict. This is followed by (61:9): "He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist." (See next verse, below). Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought.



Quran (61:10-12) - "O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn - Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success." This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see above). It uses the Arabic word, Jihad.



Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end." The root word of "Jihad" is used again here. The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include "hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such.

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm

This is the photo of the Muslim mass murderer who was trying to follow his religious teachings to mass murder non-Muslims. Notice how Muslim he looks with his stinking beard? This is his most recent photo but the left-wing media who are working with Islamists towards a New World Order do not want you to easily link the crime to Islam.