SDP legitimizes elections by its participation but then criticizes outcome

The following two paras were published in TOC:

‘Speaking before a crowd that filled the SDP’s headquarters and spilled out the front door, SDP secretary-general Chee Soon Juan argued that the power imbalances in the system meant “elections in Singapore can have one, and only one, outcome… PAP victory.”

Control over the mainstream media, the use of the People’s Association for party purposes and the placing of the Elections Department under the purview of the Prime Minister’s Office have stacked the deck against opposition parties, assuring the continuance of PAP dominance in Singaporean politics, Chee said.’

If CSJ has known this for a long while then why does the SDP take part in elections? By taking part in elections CSJ/SDP legitimizes and lends credibility to the process. When you not just do not win, but your party does very badly, you have no reason to cry foul. By crying foul, as CSJ has done, it is worse than sour grapes.

When WP fought what I considered a tactically brilliant battle for East Coast GRC, but still lost by just over 10 percentage points, the WP team did not provide a raft of poor excuses for coming up short. Instead, WP East Coast GRC team member Dr Daniel Goh was categorical in saying, "The people has (sic) spoken and the collective wisdom is always right."

One party conducts itself with great dignity – that’s why Dr Goh deserves to be made an NCMP (because he’s a credit to Singapore) – while another party opts for victimhood and self-pity.

http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2015/09/sdp-sets-its-sights-on-fundamental-barriers-to-democracy/

I started typing a reply to this thread, then i heaved a big sigh and deleted my sentence.
Just got to move on.

Nice try by TS in his usual SDP-bashing mode.

When the NCMP scheme was first launched, the Workers' Party opposed the scheme. But then JBJ decided to take up the NCMP post after becoming the highest polling loser in the '97 Cheng San election.

Why is WP legitimizing the NCMP scheme by taking up the NCMP posts when it has always opposed the scheme on principle?

Pot calling the kettle black?

For this to work, all opposition parties must agree not to take part.
With only the pappy at nomination day, the election ''victory" will be hollow indeed.

borom said:

For this to work, all opposition parties must agree not to take part.
With only the pappy at nomination day, the election ''victory" will be hollow indeed.

Click to expand...

Agree.

In the meantime, while opposition parties continue to contest the elections, they must also acknowledge and let their voters know that the electoral playing field is uneven: gerrymandering, Elections Dept under PMO, absolute control over state print and broadcast media with a $1 bil annual budget, abusing PA and its grassroots bodies for political purposes, using taxpayers' money for pork-barrelling, defamation lawsuits.

borom said:

For this to work, all opposition parties must agree not to take part.
With only the pappy at nomination day, the election ''victory" will be hollow indeed.

Click to expand...

Take a leaf from the way Prataman was 'elected'. Notwithstanding the fact that there wasn't any election but they still go around referring him as 'elected president'. The objective of boycotting the election is to bring upon international spotlight and follow by pressure and sanctions from international community. I don't think this is going to happen for as long as we continue to ally USA on diplomatic front. Hence It unlikely pap is going to be bothered and will still refer themselves as ' elected government'.

All the Opposition parties should continue to harass the PAP until there the Elections Department become an independent body with the head appointed by a panel with equal representation by the top five political parties.

By blaming the system, csj absolve himself from being accountable for his failure to deliver result for 2 decades. And I am not even talking about hitting the elusive 50% but getting past the 40% mark.

borom said:

For this to work, all opposition parties must agree not to take part.
With only the pappy at nomination day, the election ''victory" will be hollow indeed.

Click to expand...

Aiyoh! Politics folder still alive ah? Let me tell you why it is foolish to decline ncmp seat.
Because there is something called nmp, which is an even bigger joke. Special interest groups representing dissenting interests can voice out their displeasure at the PAP, displacing the need for opposition to represent them in parliament. Got seat just sit lah, act macho for what? SG is no place for bravado.

3_M said:

By blaming the system, csj absolve himself from being accountable for his failure to deliver result for 2 decades. And I am not even talking about hitting the elusive 50% but getting past the 40% mark.

Click to expand...

SDP has emerged as the second best party and I think that is commendable.

How many also noticed that this time in 2015, "Chee's party" has done better than "Chiam's party", despite all the talk that Chee "ousted" Chiam.