SPP Ah Neh Lodge Report Against Old Folks' Home! Pls Spare The Old Folks! Tolong!

SINGAPORE - Singapore's People Party member Ravi Philemon has reported the Swami (Sunshine Welfare Action Mission) Home in Sembawang to the Registry of Societies for allowing the People's Action Party (PAP) to introduce its candidates there last week.

Mr Philemon, who works for a voluntary welfare organisation, noted that Swami's constitution states that it should not " indulge in any political activity or allow its funds and / or premises to be used for political purposes".

The PAP had unveiled its candidates for Sembawang GRC at the home on Aug 14.



Meet PAP's Sembawang GRC team

Video
PAP reveals Sembawang GRC line-up, includes former Aljunied GRC candidate Ong Ye Kung

"I ask that the Registrar investigate if the Society had breached its own constitution by allowing a political activity to take place on its premise," said Mr Philemon in an e-mail to Registrar, Mr Marvin Sim, which was also sent to the Ministry of Home Affairs. He posted a screenshot of the e-mail on Facebook.

PAP's Mr Khaw Boon Wan, who is National Development Minister and anchor minister for the Sembawang GRC team, had said at the Aug 14 event that the Swami Home was chosen because the rent was affordable, and fit Singapore's culture of not spending excessively on election campaigns.

http://www.straitstimes.com/politic...-investigate-swami-home-for-hosting-pap-event

PAP activities are government activities. As such, it is not partisan/political. It is government activities, just like a minister visiting a charity home or doing local grassroots. What the fuck is this Ah Neh bitching about?

JohnTan said:

PAP activities are government activities. As such, it is not partisan/political. It is government activities, just like a minister visiting a charity home or doing local grassroots. What the fuck is this Ah Neh bitching about?

Click to expand...

Is the formula PAP, ie. the party in power= Government, applicable to Singapore only or universal?

why only during election times, they showed up?

groinroot said:

Is the formula PAP, ie. the party in power= Government, applicable to Singapore only or universal?

Click to expand...

It is universal. But vast majority of governments lack the brains to set up grassroots bodies. Their MPs also are not interested to start off their career in politics as grassroots volunteers. In contrast, most PAP candidates once were grassroots volunteers for years before standing for elections. PAP cadres and MPs are expected to serve as grassroots volunteers.

Rental affordable. No excessive spending for election campaign. Bloody joke. They are just trying to impress voters that they are very careful with money. Just pretending. I am surprise no fireworks at SWAMI when they visited.

JohnTan said:

PAP activities are government activities. As such, it is not partisan/political. It is government activities, just like a minister visiting a charity home or doing local grassroots. What the fuck is this Ah Neh bitching about?

Click to expand...

are you stupid? these new candidates are not even elected official so they are not gahment but politicking candidates who has no business to bring such elderly organisation into disrepute. who is in charge of MCYS? who is commissioner in charge of societies?

virus said:

are you stupid? these new candidates are not even elected official so they are not gahment but politicking candidates who has no business to bring such elderly organisation into disrepute. who is in charge of MCYS? who is commissioner in charge of societies?

Click to expand...

The government is PAP and PAP is the government. Hence, PAP cadres are considered government representatives even if they are not officially public servants or civil servants. That's why PAP cadres are entrusted with leading the CCCs, RCs and varoius grassroots groups. They are held accountable to the government and have to executive the government's national policies at the precinct levels.

A PAP cadre is in charge of MCYS. He probably gave the all-clear. So, due process has been followed and SPP should not be harassing the old folks' home and disturbing their peace in order to milk political mileage. Voters of Potong Pasir and Bishan-Toa Payoh will make SPP pay dearly for this at the polls.

this sort of ungracious behavior by the OPPO idiocy will further degrade the standard of the oppo



the pap team were doing a good charity work making the residents of the home happy and cheerful
nothing to do with canvassing for votes or gaining support

there are so many groups going to the home to entertain the residents of the home, making them happy and cheerful and joyful

such a petty letter of compliant simply reflects on the stupidity and idiocy of the oppo

and this will further erode whatever little support the oppo have

this is damned stupid complaint...really stupid....but thanks for supporting the pap effort in charity work
and this will certainly make the pap team more victorious !!!

well done pap!!!

If it had been Opposition, entire Welfare home be shutdown and all directors be held under ISA for engaging in subversive activities !!!



http://www.tnp.sg/news/singapore-news/swami-home-told-letting-pap-use-its-premises




The Sunshine Welfare Action Mission (Swami) Home has been advised to adhere to its constitution after it rented out its premises to the People's Action Party (PAP) to introduce its candidates for Sembawang GRC for the upcoming General Election last Friday.

This followed a complaint by an opposition party member to the Registry of Societies yesterday that the home had flouted its own constitution that does not allow it to use its funds and/or premises for political purposes.

Singapore People's Party (SPP) member Ravi Philemon, 46, told The New Paper that a charity organisation such as the Swami Home "should be apolitical and should not be used for whatever political reasons".

A Ministry of Home Affairs spokesman said in a press statement last night: "The Sunshine Welfare Action Mission (Swami) is a registered society. It is governed by its constitution on what activities are permissible and what are not.

"It is obliged to adhere to its constitution. Swami was advised by the Registry of Societies on Aug 17 to ensure strict adherence to its constitution."

Mr Philemon, the director of voluntary welfare organisation Operation Hope Foundation Singapore, said: "I'm a voter in Sembawang and the news was relevant to me...It was later in the day when I read it more thoroughly that I realised it was held at a welfare home."

Mr Philemon sent an e-mail yesterday morning to ask the Registrar to investigate if the Society had breached its constitution.

Mr Khaw Boon Wan, the anchor minister for the Sembawang GRC team, said last Friday that the Swami Home was picked because the rent was affordable and it fit Singapore's culture of not spending excessively on election campaigns.

RENTAL

In response to media queries yesterday, the team said it had rented the premises "purely on commercial terms - partly to support this VWO and partly because we felt it was an accessible place and had sufficient space to accommodate reporters".

"We had not checked the VWO's constitution. However, we have nothing but the highest regard for the work done by this VWO and will continue to support it in any way we can," it said in a press statement.

Swami Home president Low Chang Yee said that when the MPs wanted to rent its premises, it agreed "as the rental of our premises on commercial terms was helpful for the Home".

"We have never used any of our funds to help any political party. The funds we raised from rental of our premises are used to help us run the Swami Nursing Home and our other charitable causes," he said.

"We did not check our constitution at the time... but now we have been informed and are aware of this provision in our constitution."

Singapore Management University law don Eugene Tan said: "In the worst case scenario, a charity or society, which is in breach of its constitution, could be deregistered by the authorities.

LKY has returned and possessed Mr JT!

JohnTan said:

The government is PAP and PAP is the government. Hence, PAP cadres are considered government representatives even if they are not officially public servants or civil servants. That's why PAP cadres are entrusted with leading the CCCs, RCs and varoius grassroots groups. They are held accountable to the government and have to executive the government's national policies at the precinct levels.

A PAP cadre is in charge of MCYS. He probably gave the all-clear. So, due process has been followed and SPP should not be harassing the old folks' home and disturbing their peace in order to milk political mileage. Voters of Potong Pasir and Bishan-Toa Payoh will make SPP pay dearly for this at the polls.

Click to expand...

So our friend the Minister from Malaysia unwittingly broke the law?

Surely as a Minister he should be aware that Welfare Agencies should not be politicised? Maybe he is truely in the dark - I wonder what else he is unaware of?

Aiya.... what to do? Sad that PAP have to use imported talent because local born citizens are not willing to carry the hatchet for the PAP

Force 136 said:

So our friend the Minister from Malaysia unwittingly broke the law?

Surely as a Minister he should be aware that Welfare Agencies should not be politicised? Maybe he is truely in the dark - I wonder what else he is unaware of?

Aiya.... what to do? Sad that PAP have to use imported talent because local born citizens are not willing to carry the hatchet for the PAP

Click to expand...

PAP already has an explanation for this fiasco and it is: a honest mistake!