• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Pride and Arrogance of Singaporeans, a threat to the national security of Singapore.

bic_cherry

Alfrescian
Loyal
Pride and Arrogance of Singaporeans, a threat to the national security of Singapore.
A slip of the tongue let the naked truth out, the 'Singapore Population White Paper 2030 (2013)' incontrovertibly denigrating the nursing profession: defining it as “low skilled” workers.[Health officials in strong defence of nurses (The Sunday Times, 10 February 2013, Pg 8)].

Blogs that do not lie also report the truth: "There’s a lot of verbal abuse that we’re suffer. We’re expected to be efficient despite being severely overworked (in Singapore)."[TOC: 30Jan2015: 'Government: Hard to get SG locals to become nurse'].

With such a prevalent culture of prejudice and abuse against frontline service staff, not least the nursing profession, Singapore seems now dependent upon transient (foreign) service staff to man its hospitals: 'Singapore faces nurse shortfall for years to come' [By Salma Khalik, The Straits Times, 15 Feb 2013]

"In the two years leading up to the opening of the 580-bed Khoo Teck Puat Hospital in 2010, about 7,400 nurses were added to the pool - of which more than 4,000 were foreign. ... The latest SNB annual report shows that the bulk of foreign nurses are from the Philippines, with close to 4,000 of them working here. "

Although it is supposed that "Singapore has 34,200 trained nurses", nothing is mentioned about their nationality/ citizenship.
Based upon numbers of nurses recruited annually however, the period from 2007- 2011 shows a majority of the 14,882 nurses recruited in that period to be foreign sourced.
ST+Graphics+-Nurse+recruitment.jpg


And as if the lack of nursing manpower adequacy issue wasn't severe enough, most of the Singapore population is so grossly unwell/ unfit, it might be a miracle if many reached bomb shelters without a heart attack killing them first. E.g.: 'A new dialysis patient every 5 hours in S'pore' [ST, May 10 2015]; (Feb2012: 'Health alert: One in 3 will develop diabetes'). Even the annual military reservist physical fitness test reveals as much, with under 40% medically cleared to attempt the test, and of this tiny population, less than half pass.

Even the social front is nothing to cheer about with "Divorces in Singapore rose to an all time high in 2014, placing the republic’s divorce rate among the top six countries in Asia" (Mar2015): i.e. the fragmentation of the social compact, it is doubtful if Singapore NSmen would have much faith in the ability of the female half of society to provide decent medical care, let alone overcome the eclipse of thrust that a hostile divorce tends to incur.

Foreign talents of every kind, especially the qualified/ talented ones and their offspring are routinely evacuated home by their countries of origin in times of conflict, just as Singapore evacuated Singaporeans by from Yemen [URL="http://www.straitstimes.com/news/singapore/more-singapore-stories/story/singapore-confirms-citizen-evacuated-yemen-oman-20150603]"after Iranian-backed Houthi militia took control of the capital Sanaa"[/URL].

When push comes to shove, Singaporeans will feel very insecure even in their own home.

The solution:
- NS for women, focusing on nursing and preventive healthcare that even the Minister of Health himself admitted are woefully deficient: “If you look around, our investments in health promotion and diseases prevention, I think... it is actually significantly lower than the amount of money we spend on treating diseases,” he (Minister Gan Kim Yong) said. [TDY, 11Feb2015: 'Empower consumers with holistic approach to healthcare: Gan Kim Yong'].

- 1.5yrs of hospitals, nursing homes, healthcare institution NS rotations as NS plus annual reservists 2-week practical skills-updates to obtain basic nursing competencies such that the healthcare system will not collapse in times of national disaster/ war.
(PS: whilst men would typically serve in combat positions and women in nursing ones, there is nothing to stop men from being posted to nursing vocations as long as the most suitable person is deployed (based upon fitness, education etc): NS can also be cut to 1-1.5 yrs with the more enlightened participation of women).

Outcome: Singapore women will cease to brainwash their kids into believing that nursing/ service professionals are “low skilled” workers. Singapore men will be more inspired to perform during national service when they notice parallel contributions by female citizens. The health and fitness status of every Singapore family can be expected to be very good since at least one parent in a nuclear family would have some medical experience and would thus be much more conscientious in adopting healthy lifestyle adaptations (having hands on experience about the strain upon society that preventable disease can cause). More Singaporeans will be proficient in serving others and for that earn an honest wage (rather than depending upon cheap sourced foreigners for assistance and getting wage supplement from gahmen(wage support schemes): and be qualified to train foreigners instead). Singapore will become a more compassionate society, and with new found military and social if not vocational confidence, Singaporeans can look forward to a much brighter future remaining home (i.e. no need to consider migrating to greener pastures).

PS: next time, PM Lee HL should please make a healthier choice to queue for, a nation is look up to him for a good example to follow:
u362eyr.jpg
 
Last edited:

bic_cherry

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Pride and Arrogance of Singaporeans, a threat to the national security of Singapo

Same topic, @ another forum:
Mmichael said:
Thread source (A1): 'Pride and Arrogance of Singaporeans, a threat to the national security of Singapore.'
Respecting authority is one of the basic tenets of rujiao (Confucianism).
You respect your leaders, your respect your parents, you respect your school teachers, you respect your older siblings,
and you respect that hand which passes you your paycheque.
dollar-crown-business-man-worship-animated-gif-clr.gif
sauce: http://images-animated-gif.blogspot.sg/p/money-animated-gifs-banknotes-images.html

Remove that, and you have the wild wild USA. :wink:
After years of Mao rule, China built Confucius Institutes for what? How do you govern a country which banned all religions and became so lawless that if Zhou Enlai had not sent the PLA to defend the Forbidden City, today there would be one reason less, to visit Beijing. The Imperial Palace would have been razed to the ground by those lawless Red Guards.
If Singapore were to do what you are grumbling about in your post, then you can forget about having your daughter look after you the day when you are non-ambulant and lying on your sick bed. With the revival of Confucian thinking, China has now regained a fair amount of its lost culture, including respect for their elders. Instead of mocking/humiliating their elders and squealing on them as in the days of the Red Guards, today, most of them would offer their seats to old people whenever they get on the buses. Sadly, people like you want us to go the other way. :mad:
From your 50,000 posts here, we can all see that you are a very self-centred and egotistic person who only care about yourself, just like the thread you start to complain about the MRT train for not displaying the destination BIG BIG for YOU to see. This post of yours is not different. You did not realise how short sighted your comments show you to be, that's it. :mad:
[highlight + animation added]
I agree with you that elders/leaders ought to be respected.
However, when important organs of state which are by constitution supposed to be apolitical and non-partisan in their constitution display a bias along partisan political lines, then the citizenry ought to speak out against it. Otherwise, Singapore will just degenerate into a backward authoritarian/ monarchic state ruled by feudal landlords whose sole concern is their own personal power and wealth: a huge regression from the prosperous cosmopolitan democratic state we are today.

E.g(s).:
The AGC (despite being constitutionally mandated to be politically neutral) rooting for the PAP to the extent of being the PAP's private legal counsel/ campaign manager even...
ckBPMug.jpg
(Pict source)(alt source)

Tax payers $$$ being used to buy votes through the PA (a civil service organisation which by constitution, ought to be politically neutral/ indifferent):
liftupgrade.jpg


I believe that the highest power in this world is God: simply because after we die, God will judge each of us. I thus wouldn't be surprised if LKY were in a state either better/worse than I in the after life. Whilst LKY did magic for the nominal GDP of Singapore, much of the downstream repercussions remain unstudied to date by human scholarship (e.g. effect on casinos on human relationships, global warming effects of high carbon intensity enterprise, facilitation of tax evasion and money laundering by global banking industry, the effects and severity of personal/ national debt upon the global economy). Most of LKY life (as would be any ordinary human life) would be spent behind closed doors: unseen to the world: only God would know what LKY's true plans were and what LKY did in his free time.

Citizens must thus speak out when import organs of state display such tendencies towards corruption/ mischief that make Singapore/ its Government not so pure anymore. The highest law of the land is Natural Law, and that is the Law of God studied by honest and diligent Man.

PS: even though U call USA 'wild', LKY had deep respect for the creativity and perseverance USA has shown as evidenced by its founding father's adherence to moral principles as enshrined in the USA constitution. e.g.: the respect for life (frowning upon abortion), creativity, respect for property, keeping of promises etc. Perhaps one should not just judge a book by it's cover. Not all of America is rotten to the core.
 
Top