• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

The First Ever Photograph Of Light As A Particle & A Wave Is Here

nirvarq

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
http://www.collective-evolution.com...ograph-of-light-as-a-particle-a-wave-is-here/

1-thefirstever-728x400.jpg


Scientists at EPFL have succeeded in capturing the first-ever snapshot of light behaving as a particle and a wave, Phys.org reports.

Back when Einstein first popularized the idea that light actually behaves as both a particle and wave, scientists began the mighty endeavour of capturing this concept visually.

However, this is no easy task – the closest we have come is seeing either wave or particle, but always at different times.

But EPFL scientists have now come up with a clever way to counteract this issue.

The experiment is set up like this:

A pulse of laser light is fired at a tiny metallic nanowire. The laser adds energy to the charged particles in the nanowire, causing them to vibrate. Light travels along this tiny wire in two possible directions, like cars on a highway. When waves travelling in opposite directions meet each other they form a new wave that looks like it is standing in place. Here, this standing wave becomes the source of light for the experiment, radiating around the nanowire.

This is where the experiment’s trick comes in: The scientists shot a stream of electrons close to the nanowire, using them to image the standing wave of light.

As the electrons interacted with the confined light on the nanowire, they either sped up or slowed down. Using the ultrafast microscope to image the position where this change in speed occurred, Carbone’s team could now visualize the standing wave, which acts as a fingerprint of the wave-nature of light.

While this phenomenon shows the wave-like nature of light, it simultaneously demonstrated its particle aspect as well. As the electrons pass close to the standing wave of light, they “hit” the light’s particles, the photons.
3-thefirstever
As mentioned above, this affects their speed, making them move faster or slower. This change in speed appears as an exchange of energy “packets” (quanta) between electrons and photons. The very occurrence of these energy packets shows that the light on the nanowire behaves as a particle.

Credit: Fabrizio Carbone/EPFL
Credit: Fabrizio Carbone/EPFL
“This experiment demonstrates that, for the first time ever, we can film quantum mechanics – and its paradoxical nature – directly,” says Fabrizio Carbone. In addition, the importance of this pioneering work can extend beyond fundamental science and to future technologies. As Carbone explains: “Being able to image and control quantum phenomena at the nanometer scale like this opens up a new route towards quantum computing.”

Related CE Article:

How Is This Possible? Scientists Observe ONE Particle Exist In MULTIPLE states (wave).

Source: Phys.org
 

nirvarq

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
[video=youtube_share;mlaVHxUSiNk]https://youtu.be/mlaVHxUSiNk[/video]

Published on 2 Mar 2015
Light is a wave and a particle, but no-one's managed to see both at the same time.... until now!

The first ever snapshot of light as both wave and particle is taken by Fabrizio Carbone’s lab at EPFL
 

nirvarq

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Light or Atom can be a wave or Particle it is not Singular and only appear so to the "Observer"

Hence there is NO Distance, so there is no space, therefore no such thing as linear time. Everything's an illusion ? <3
 

babuSingh

Alfrescian
Loyal
Every single thing that we see and feel is theoretically derived from particle physics, even gravity. The largest break through was the discovery of existence of the elusive higgs boson particle a couple of years back by LHC.
Special and general relativity explained why anormalies occur on the gigantic scale like light wave and gravity but in order for us to understand what exactly happen underneath all these phenomenal observances, we need to dig deeper and hence that is what scientists are doing right now.
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
Every single thing that we touch and see are theoretically derived from our own perception, pretty much based on our prior knowledge and/or experiences.

For example, even the same color of the same frequency may be perceived as two different colors or the same color with different hues by two persons with different distribution of rods and cones.

Viz-a-vis the way we touch, taste, smell, hear and feel :smile::smile::smile:
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Very deep for me. I tried but cannot understand.
Maybe I only need to worry when is my next meal. :biggrin:

The subject that most boggles the mind is the information paradox.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_information_paradox

Main approaches to the solution of the paradox[edit]

Information is irretrievably lost[SUP][10][/SUP][SUP][11][/SUP][edit]


  • Advantage: Seems to be a direct consequence of relatively non-controversial calculation based on semiclassical gravity.
  • Disadvantage: Violates unitarity, as well as energy conservation or causality.
Information gradually leaks out during the black-hole evaporation[SUP][10][/SUP][SUP][11][/SUP][edit]


  • Advantage: Intuitively appealing because it qualitatively resembles information recovery in a classical process of burning.
  • Disadvantage: Requires a large deviation from classical and semiclassical gravity (which do not allow information to leak out from the black hole) even for macroscopic black holes for which classical and semiclassical approximations are expected to be good approximations.
Information suddenly escapes out during the final stage of black-hole evaporation[SUP][10][/SUP][SUP][11][/SUP][edit]


  • Advantage: A significant deviation from classical and semiclassical gravity is needed only in the regime in which the effects of quantum gravity are expected to dominate.
  • Disadvantage: Just before the sudden escape of information, a very small black hole must be able to store an arbitrary amount of information, which violates the Bekenstein bound.
Information is stored in a Planck-sized remnant[SUP][10][/SUP][SUP][11][/SUP][edit]


  • Advantage: No mechanism for information escape is needed.
  • Disadvantage: To contain the information from any evaporated black hole, the remnants would need to have an infinite number of internal states. It has been argued that it would be possible to produce an infinite amount of pairs of these remnants since they are small and indistinguishable from the perspective of the low-energy effective theory.[SUP][12][/SUP]
Information is stored in a baby universe that separates from our own universe.[SUP][11][/SUP][SUP][13][/SUP][edit]


  • Advantage: This scenario is predicted by the Einstein–Cartan theory of gravity which extends general relativity to matter with intrinsic angular momentum (spin). No violation of known general principles of physics is needed.
  • Disadvantage: It is difficult to test the Einstein–Cartan theory because its predictions are significantly different from general-relativistic ones only at extremely high densities.
Information is encoded in the correlations between future and past[SUP][14][/SUP][SUP][15][/SUP][edit]


  • Advantage: Semiclassical gravity is sufficient, i.e., the solution does not depend on details of (still not well understood) quantum gravity.
  • Disadvantage: Contradicts the intuitive view of nature as an entity that evolves with time.
Black hole horizon acts as a firewall[edit]

In a thought experiment based on simple logic Almheiri and colleagues[SUP][16][/SUP] find contradiction in black hole radiation. Their conclusion is that black holes end at the impenetrable horizon.
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
Boss,

I feel that it's more interesting to find out if Schrödinger's cat is dead or alive :biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:
 
Top