• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Heartless authority

sirus

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Woman fined for curry puff factory in rental flat – most empathise with her

JUNE 2, 2015 BY ANDREW LOH IN MAIN STORY, NEWS

robiahpic.jpg


Robiah Lia Caniago.
Does that name mean anything to you? Probably not.

Robiah, 40, is an Indonesian woman, who is married to a Singaporean man. They have two children together – a son, nine-years old, and a daughter, seven.

When her husband was jailed in 2012 for drug offences, Robiah had to find a way to feed her children and herself.

So, she decided to make curry puffs from her two-room rental flat in Lengkok Bahru to sell to nasi padang stalls, The New Paper reported on Monday.

Her puffs were apparently so good that in October 2013, a man she had recently met offered to go into business with her.

“He bought cooking pots and pans for her kitchen,” The New Paper said.

Soon, she was doubling her production of the puffs, selling not only to the nasi padang stalls but also to private customers.

But perhaps of the popularity of her curry puffs, the Housing and Development Board (HDB) came to know about it.

Eventually, the authorities fined her S$3,000 last Wednesday.

Unable to pay the fine, Robiah was sent to jail for five days.

Her relatives had to care for her children while she was incarcerated.

She was released early yesterday morning.

You can read The New Paper’s report here: “She ran 2-room flat curry puff ‘factory’”.

So, what do Singaporeans think about it?

Well, from what can be gleaned online, many are sympathetic of what she did – that while she may have contravened the law, she was nonetheless trying to feed her children while her husband was in jail.

On The New Paper’s Facebook page itself, the comments mostly criticised the authorities for bringing the legal action against Robiah.

R1

R3

And this one from Allan Tan:

R2

The support for Robiah has also spilled over to the SGAG Facebook page, where the page’s admin posted:

SGAG1



And some who commented said:

SGAG2

And at least two bloggers have written to support Robiah.

Over at the “Singapore Beacon” blog, the writer says, “The NEA should have some compassion in just issuing her with a warning rather than taking her to court. As a result she was fined $3,000.”

The blogger added, “It was not like she tried to sell off her children in order to make ends meet.”

Another blogger, Alvinology, said, “She did not steal, nor did she harm anyone directly.”

“Here’s someone who would work hard to earn her own living rather than leech off public assistance; but sadly, she broke the law doing so,” the blogger said.

“By Singapore’s law, she is definitely in the wrong for running an illegal kitchen, evading taxes as well as food and safety inspections to ensure hygiene.

“Morally, if she kept her kitchen and operations clean, there is not much harm done to society. After all, she is earning an ‘honest’ living.

“You know those grandmothers and aunties who make pineapple tarts and other goodies at home to sell during the Chinese New Year festive period? What Caniago did is the same as what they do, except that they are not caught.”

What can we do to help Robiah and her children?

Alvinology suggests this: “Savvy businessmen who read about this news report may want to invest to set up shop with her. If she was to move back to Indonesia, her two children will be estranged from their mother.”

Let’s hope the authorities will have mercy on the poor woman who was just trying to feed her children and perhaps help her find a more sustainable – and legal – way to do so.

The above article was first published on Public Opinion.

http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2015/06/woman-fined-for-curry-puff-factory-in-rental-flat-most-empathise-with-her/

https://www.facebook.com/thenewpaper/posts/10153293088907295
 

soIsee

Alfrescian
Loyal
Sinkie and those alike who want to stay here and have a hand into commercial activities must PAY the head LOONG shark and all their related kaki fees.

Or else you face ' their law' ! LoL
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
i think she is wrong to make curry puff.... she should make nasi bryani, begger chicken, roast duck and babi Que.
 

Charlie99

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Whereas the HDB and / or the Attorney General's chambers has the discretion whether or not to lay charges, I believe that there is reasonable grounds to be compassionate and sympathetic in this scenario, by speaking to the accused, and perhaps, give her the benefit of the doubt, to allow her to earn enough to support her family.

With respect, this may be another situation where the very well compensated politicians and senior civil servants do not understand that when an individual is hungry, and have to feed hungry family members, such an honest and hard working individual, should not be charged, fined or sent to jail. I also believe that the presiding judge should have exercised discretion, and perhaps, ordered a reprimand or simply discharged her.
 

Microsoft

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
isn't it amazing...those hum ga chan papies dogs can turn every fucking issue into moni making to fuel their millions pay check...sori...moi jus insulted...dogs...:o
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
Don't b gullible the fact she don't know how to cheat n lie serve little to impress me. Just take a good look at JohnTan zero yang Yin neo gim huah n Lionel De souzs. All the scums in a single breath n how they befit the exceptional familee n how the familee benefitted from them. For that alone her crime r insatiable.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
If her puffs were so good, she should be making lots of money, or working for Old Chang Kee. Glad that this woman is now safely behind bars, where her curry puffs would not cause food poisoning to innocent customers.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
This is the reason why no sane person should vote for the PAP. Instead of solving pertinent problems, it seeks to micromanage and screw over the peasants, trapping them in a web of hollow legalism.

The Biblical expression 'To strain at a gnat and swallow a camel' describes the PAP perfectly. :cool:
 

looneytan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
If out of the blue I offer to stay in jail for 5 days, will the authorities give me $3,000 upon my release
 

Satyr

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is the reason why no sane person should vote for the PAP. Instead of solving pertinent problems, it seeks to micromanage and screw over the peasants, trapping them in a web of hollow legalism.

The Biblical expression 'To strain at a gnat and swallow a camel' describes the PAP perfectly. :cool:

They sound more like Pharisees each passing day.
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
If her puffs were so good, she should be making lots of money, or working for Old Chang Kee. Glad that this woman is now safely behind bars, where her curry puffs would not cause food poisoning to innocent customers.

Why should she working for Old Chunky??....the government should've encouragement such talents, furthermore...she is a FT class 1...better than any lazy, out of work bums.....that, smoke cigarettes, drink beers at the coffee shops..

The government killed all those entrepreneur spirit , with a fire in their eyes, hunger in their bellies & spurs in their hides...better than any of the MIW's....who are just slow, lumbering, dinosaurs...who only run fast, when the dinner gong is sounded...:mad:
 

Manager

Don't mess with me
Generous Asset
Why cant she get a proper job like the many hardworking Singaporean aunties have done. :rolleyes:

I have no empathy for her, in fact 3000 fine is too little.
Not only did she endanger the life of many Singaporean by selling her unhygienic food, she is also taking away potential business from nearby curry cuff stalls who paid their taxes. :mad:




Woman fined for curry puff factory in rental flat – most empathise with her

JUNE 2, 2015 BY ANDREW LOH IN MAIN STORY, NEWS

robiahpic.jpg
 

Kuailan

Alfrescian
Loyal
This is the reason why no sane person should vote for the PAP. Instead of solving pertinent problems, it seeks to micromanage and screw over the peasants, trapping them in a web of hollow legalism.
The Biblical expression 'To strain at a gnat and swallow a camel' describes the PAP perfectly. :cool:

Fully agree with you. Merciless gahmen has no compassion. She try to put food on table for her children
instead she got fine by gangster gahmen can't pay go jail ,,

like what idiotic John tan mention food poisoning, her children would hv got it first! Not her customer..
Early days every one eat at legal or iLeegal food stall they food Poisoning? ? Not that I know off!
 
Last edited:

sirus

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Aiya, why can't the authority just give her warning since nobody got food poisoning from eating her curry puffs?

VTO!
 

Manager

Don't mess with me
Generous Asset
what a stupid post by a dumb person.:rolleyes:

Fully agree with you. Merciless gahmen has no compassion. She try to put food on table for her children
instead she got fine by gangster gahmen can't pay go jail ,,

like idiot John tan mention food poisoning her children would hv got it first! No her customer..

Like what John idiot mention
 
Top