-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Why Amos being an intelligent person choose not to hang out with PAP??
- Thread starter tonychat
- Start date
Jiu hu kia, you think he is like you? Suck UMNO's cock and allow your mother to be screwed by UMNO'S Ah Neh buddies MIC?
Fuck home to Matland if you have no intention to protest against PAP.or vote against them.
How u know he's intelligent? He's scholar or what? To me, he's crazier than a kamikaze pilot!
did you mother also offer her ass beside her phua chee buy to this PAP master of yours???
and if it is not enough, you offered your ass too??
It says a lot about the situation.. the fact that Amos and other sensible citizen hang out with SDP who support human and individual rights..
whereas, good for nothing, self-centered, selfish, have something to gain losers will go and lick PAP's balls... This is the hard truth..
People who enthusiastically associate themselves with the PAP usually do it for some gain: free food, freebies, business connections, media exposure, web traffic etc.
Everybody seeks out his or her own happiness, that should be obvious. That special bunch delights in base, material gains to the exclusion of everything else, including principles... they're stuck at the bottom of Maslow's hierarchy of needs.
Everybody seeks out his or her own happiness, that should be obvious. That special bunch delights in base, material gains to the exclusion of everything else, including principles... they're stuck at the bottom of Maslow's hierarchy of needs.
You have just answered the question yourself.
How appropriate and eloquently you have put it.
Lowest form of Maslow's Hierarchy of needs just stuck to their mindset.
If anything, it proves that SDP improve your knowledge of current affairs. If you're a JC student, it's not too late to start reading SDP articles and get yourself well prepared for GP exams papers. You no longer have to memorize 10-year series and model answers, contents of which you don't understand, or you understand but you don't necessarily agree, just to score points.
We're definitely looking at a very different new generation, very different Singapore, if SDP is in charge.
We're definitely looking at a very different new generation, very different Singapore, if SDP is in charge.
Look no further for illustration to hammer home this point: Yang Yin and how he wormed his way into grassroots to get his SPR from the pappies.
Amos is certainly intelligent. You do not have to be a scholar to be intelligent. He may be a crazy kid with the energy and affability to talk about homosexuality and Little India riot in an amusing way but he has made his point to stir political consciousness of other youths in his age group.
How can anyone with O-level score of 11 points for L1R5 be considered intelligent? In my son's alma mater RI, students with such scores are deemed as a fucking disgrace!
No lah! U r confusing loudmouth for intelligence!
Being vocally expressive need not be mutually exclusive with intelligence.
Here is loudmouth who is a proven Class A moron:
Being vocally expressive need not be mutually exclusive with intelligence.
Here is loudmouth who is a proven Class A moron:
Bestest moron!
But they are right at the top of Pinky's hierarchy of greed.
Being vocally expressive need not be mutually exclusive with intelligence.
Here is loudmouth who is a proven Class A moron:
Wilkipedia describes this useless moron as Class A so aptly !
Taken from Wikipedia :
"Disadvantage of class-A amplifiers
Class-A amplifiers are inefficient. A theoretical efficiency of 50% is obtainable with transformer output coupling and only 25% with capacitive coupling, unless deliberate use of nonlinearities is made (such as in square-law output stages). In a power amplifier, this not only wastes power and limits operation with batteries, but increases operating costs and requires higher-rated output devices. Inefficiency comes from the standing current that must be roughly half the maximum output current, and a large part of the power supply voltage is present across the output device at low signal levels. If high output power is needed from a class-A circuit, the power supply and accompanying heat becomes significant. For every watt delivered to the load, the amplifier itself, at best, uses an extra watt. For high power amplifiers this means very large and expensive power supplies and heat sinks."
Last edited:
Similar threads
